Abstract
Sociologists, philosophers and historians of science are gradually recognizing the importance of visual representation. This is part of a more general movement away from a theory-centric view of science and towards an interest in practical aspects of observation and experimentation. Rather than treating science as a matter of demonstrating the logical connection between theoretical and empirical statements, an increasing number of investigations are examining how scientists compose and use diagrams, graphs, photographs, micrographs, maps, charts, and related visual displays. This paper focuses on diagrams in biology, and tries to demonstrate how diagrams are an integral part of the production of scientific knowledge. In order to disclose some of the distinctive practical and analytical uses of diagrams, the paper contrasts the way diagrams and photographs are used in biological texts. Both diagrams and photographs are shown to be “constructions” that separately and together mediate the investigation of scientific phenoman.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpers, Svetlana: 1983,The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Amann, Klaus, and K. Knorr-Cetina: 1990, ‘The Fixation of Visual Evidence’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 85–121. Previously published inHuman Studies 11 (2–3), 133–169.
Audubon, John J.: 1937,The Birds of America, Macmillan, New York.
Barthes, Roland: 1981,Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, Richard Howard (trans.), Hill and Wang, New York.
Bastide, Françoise: 1990, ‘The Iconography of Scientific Texts: Principles of Analysis’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 187–229.
Becker, Howard: 1986, ‘Do Photographs Tell the Truth?’, Chapter 14 ofDoing Things Together, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois, pp. 273–292.
Benjamin, Walter: 1969, ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, in W. Benjamin,Illuminations, Hannah Arendt (ed.), Harry Zohn (trans.), Schoken Books, New York, pp. 217–251.
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann: 1966,The Social Construction of Reality, Anchor Books, New York.
Bjelic, Dusan and Michael Lynch: in press, 1991, ‘The Work of a Scientific Demonstration: Respecifying Newton's and Goethe's Theories of Color’, to appear in G. Watson and R. Seiler (eds.),Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, Sage Publications, London and Beverly Hills.
Cambrosio, Alberto, Peter Keating, and Michael Mackenzie: 1990, ‘Scientific Practice in the Courtroom: The Construction of Sociotechnical Identities in a Biotechnology Patent Dispute’,Social Problems 37, 275–293.
Clarke, Adele, and Joan Fujumura (eds.): in press, 1992,The Right Tool for the Job, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Cohen, Stanley N., Annie C. Y. Chang, Herbert W. Boyer, and Robert B. Helling: 1973, ‘Construction of Biologically Functional Bacterial Plasmidsin vitro’,Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 70(11), 3240–3244.
Collins, H. M.: 1985,Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, Sage Publications, London and Beverly Hills.
Coulter, Jeff: 1989,Mind in Action, Polity Press, Oxford.
Darwin, Charles: 1955,The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, Greenwood Press, New York.
Edgerton, Samuel Y.: 1975,The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective, Harper and Row, New York.
Edwards, Derek and David Middleton: 1988, ‘Conversational Remembering and Family Relationships: How Children Learn to Remember’,Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 5, 3–25.
Farber, Paul: 1982,The Emergence of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline: 1760–1850, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston and London.
Foucault, Michel: 1983,This Is Not a Pipe, University of California Press, Berkely.
Fyfe, Gordon, and John Law (eds.): 1988,Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Galison, Peter: 1987,How Experiments End, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Garfinkel, Harold: 1967,Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Garfinkel, Harold: 1988, ‘Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Methods, etc., in and as of the Essential Quiddity of Immortal Ordinary Soceity, (I of IV): An Announcement of Studies’,Sociological Theory 6, 103–106.
Garfinkel, Harold, Michael Lynch, and Eric Livingston: 1981, ‘The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 131–158.
Garfinkel, Harold, Eric Livingston, Michael Lynch, Douglas MacBeth, and Albert B. Robillard: 1989, ‘Respecifying the Natural Sciences as Discovering Sciences of Practical Action, I and II: Doing So Ethnographically by Administering a Schedule of Contingencies in Discussions with Laboratory Sciences and by Hanging Around Their Laboratories’, unpublished paper, Department of Sociology, UCLA.
Gerson, E., and S. L. Star: 1987, ‘Representations and Re-Representations in Scientific Work’, unpublished paper, Tremont Research Institute, San Francisco.
Gilbert, G. Nigel, and Michael Mulkay: 1984,Opening Pandora's Box: An Analysis of Scientists' Discourse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Gombrich, E. H.: 1960,Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Gooding, David, Trevor Pinch, and Simon Schaffer: 1989,The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Gould, Steven J.: 1981,The Mismeasure of Man, W.W. Norton, New York.
Hacking, Ian: 1983,Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Hanson, N. R.: 1958,Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin: 1981,The Manufacture of Knowledge, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin, and Michael Mulkay (eds.): 1983,Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, Sage Publications, London and Beverly Hills.
Latour, Bruno: 1987,Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Latour, Bruno: 1990, ‘Drawing Things Together’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 19–68.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar: 1979,Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage Publications, London and Beverly Hills.
Latour, Bruno, and J. De Noblette (eds.): 1985,Les Vues de l'Esprit, Special issue ofCulture Technique 14.
Law, John, and John Whittaker: 1988, ‘On the Art of Representation: Notes on the Politics of Visualisation’, in G. Fyfe, and J. Law (eds.),Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Law, John, and Michael Lynch: 1990, ‘Lists, Field Guides, and the Descriptive Organization of Seeing: Birdwatching as an Exemplary Observational Activity’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar,Representation in Scietific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 267–299. Previously published inHuman Studies 11, 271–304.
Livingston, Eric: 1986,The Ethnomethodological Foundations of Mathematics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Loftus, Elizabeth: 1979,Eyewitness Identification, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Ludlow, Griscom: 1950,Audubon's Birds of America, Macmillan, New York.
Lynch, Michael: 1985a,Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Lynch, Michael: 1985b, ‘Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility’,Social Studies of Science 15, 37–66.
Lynch, Michael: 1990a, ‘The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 153–186. Previously published inHuman Studies 11, 201–234.
Lynch, Michael: 1990b, ‘Laboratory Space and the Technological Complex: An Investigation of Topical Contextures’,Science in Context 4, 81–109.
Lynch, Michael, Eric Livingston, and Harold Garfiinkel: 1983, ‘Tgemporal Order in Laboratory Work’, in K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds.),Science Obseved: Persperctives on the Social Study of Scienc, Sage Publications, London and Beverly Hills, pp. 205–238.
Lynch, Michael, and Samuel Edgerton: 1988, ‘Aesthetics and Digital Image Processing’, in G. Fyfe and J. Law (eds.),Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 184–220.
Lynch, Michael, and Steve Woolgar (eds.): 1990,Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Previously published as a special issue ofHuman Studies 11, 1988.
Mannheim, Karl: 1936,Ideology and Utopia, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Morrison, Kenneth: 1981, ‘Some Properties of “Telling Order Designs” in Didactic Inquiry’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 245–262.
Myers, Greg: 1990, ‘Every Picture Tells a Story: Illustrations in E. O. Wilson'sSociobiology’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 231–265. Previously published inHuman Studies 11, 235–270.
Newhall, Beaumont: 1964,The History of Photography, Museum of Modern Art, New York.
Peterson, Roger Tory: 1980,A Field Guide to the Birds, 4th Edition, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Pickering, Andrew: 1986,Constructing Quarks, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Pickering, Andrew (ed.): in press, 1991,Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Pinch, Trevor: 1985, ‘Towards an Analysis of Scientific Observation: The Externality and Evidential Significance of Observation Reports in Physics’,Social Studies of Science 15, 1–36.
Rudwick, Martin: 1985,The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge Among Gentlemanly Specialists, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson: 1974, ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation’,Language 50, 697–735.
Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer: 1985,Leviathan and the Air-Pump, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Star, Susan Leigh: forthcoming, ‘Layered Space, Formal Representations and Long-Distance Control: The Politics of Information’, to appear inFundamentia Scietiae.
Sudnow, David: 1972, ‘Temporal Parameters of Interpersonal Observation’, in D. Saudnow (ed.),Studies in Social Interaction, Free Press, NY, pp. 259–279.
Tufte, Edward R.: 1983,The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Cheshire, Conn., Graphics Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1958,Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Woolgar, Steve: 1990, ‘Time and Documents in Researcher Interaction: Some Ways of Making out What Is Happening in Experimental Science’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 123–152. Previously published inHuman Studies Studies 11, 171–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lynch, M. Science in the age of mechanical reproduction: moral and epistemic relations between diagrams and photographs. Biol Philos 6, 205–226 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426838
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426838