Skip to main content
Log in

Science in the age of mechanical reproduction: moral and epistemic relations between diagrams and photographs

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sociologists, philosophers and historians of science are gradually recognizing the importance of visual representation. This is part of a more general movement away from a theory-centric view of science and towards an interest in practical aspects of observation and experimentation. Rather than treating science as a matter of demonstrating the logical connection between theoretical and empirical statements, an increasing number of investigations are examining how scientists compose and use diagrams, graphs, photographs, micrographs, maps, charts, and related visual displays. This paper focuses on diagrams in biology, and tries to demonstrate how diagrams are an integral part of the production of scientific knowledge. In order to disclose some of the distinctive practical and analytical uses of diagrams, the paper contrasts the way diagrams and photographs are used in biological texts. Both diagrams and photographs are shown to be “constructions” that separately and together mediate the investigation of scientific phenoman.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpers, Svetlana: 1983,The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amann, Klaus, and K. Knorr-Cetina: 1990, ‘The Fixation of Visual Evidence’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 85–121. Previously published inHuman Studies 11 (2–3), 133–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audubon, John J.: 1937,The Birds of America, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland: 1981,Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, Richard Howard (trans.), Hill and Wang, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastide, Françoise: 1990, ‘The Iconography of Scientific Texts: Principles of Analysis’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 187–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard: 1986, ‘Do Photographs Tell the Truth?’, Chapter 14 ofDoing Things Together, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois, pp. 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter: 1969, ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, in W. Benjamin,Illuminations, Hannah Arendt (ed.), Harry Zohn (trans.), Schoken Books, New York, pp. 217–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann: 1966,The Social Construction of Reality, Anchor Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjelic, Dusan and Michael Lynch: in press, 1991, ‘The Work of a Scientific Demonstration: Respecifying Newton's and Goethe's Theories of Color’, to appear in G. Watson and R. Seiler (eds.),Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, Sage Publications, London and Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambrosio, Alberto, Peter Keating, and Michael Mackenzie: 1990, ‘Scientific Practice in the Courtroom: The Construction of Sociotechnical Identities in a Biotechnology Patent Dispute’,Social Problems 37, 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele, and Joan Fujumura (eds.): in press, 1992,The Right Tool for the Job, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Stanley N., Annie C. Y. Chang, Herbert W. Boyer, and Robert B. Helling: 1973, ‘Construction of Biologically Functional Bacterial Plasmidsin vitro’,Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 70(11), 3240–3244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M.: 1985,Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, Sage Publications, London and Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, Jeff: 1989,Mind in Action, Polity Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles: 1955,The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, Greenwood Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, Samuel Y.: 1975,The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Derek and David Middleton: 1988, ‘Conversational Remembering and Family Relationships: How Children Learn to Remember’,Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 5, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, Paul: 1982,The Emergence of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline: 1760–1850, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel: 1983,This Is Not a Pipe, University of California Press, Berkely.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, Gordon, and John Law (eds.): 1988,Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, Peter: 1987,How Experiments End, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold: 1967,Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold: 1988, ‘Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Methods, etc., in and as of the Essential Quiddity of Immortal Ordinary Soceity, (I of IV): An Announcement of Studies’,Sociological Theory 6, 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold, Michael Lynch, and Eric Livingston: 1981, ‘The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold, Eric Livingston, Michael Lynch, Douglas MacBeth, and Albert B. Robillard: 1989, ‘Respecifying the Natural Sciences as Discovering Sciences of Practical Action, I and II: Doing So Ethnographically by Administering a Schedule of Contingencies in Discussions with Laboratory Sciences and by Hanging Around Their Laboratories’, unpublished paper, Department of Sociology, UCLA.

  • Gerson, E., and S. L. Star: 1987, ‘Representations and Re-Representations in Scientific Work’, unpublished paper, Tremont Research Institute, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G. Nigel, and Michael Mulkay: 1984,Opening Pandora's Box: An Analysis of Scientists' Discourse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E. H.: 1960,Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, David, Trevor Pinch, and Simon Schaffer: 1989,The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Steven J.: 1981,The Mismeasure of Man, W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian: 1983,Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R.: 1958,Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, Karin: 1981,The Manufacture of Knowledge, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, Karin, and Michael Mulkay (eds.): 1983,Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, Sage Publications, London and Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno: 1987,Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno: 1990, ‘Drawing Things Together’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 19–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar: 1979,Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage Publications, London and Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno, and J. De Noblette (eds.): 1985,Les Vues de l'Esprit, Special issue ofCulture Technique 14.

  • Law, John, and John Whittaker: 1988, ‘On the Art of Representation: Notes on the Politics of Visualisation’, in G. Fyfe, and J. Law (eds.),Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, John, and Michael Lynch: 1990, ‘Lists, Field Guides, and the Descriptive Organization of Seeing: Birdwatching as an Exemplary Observational Activity’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar,Representation in Scietific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 267–299. Previously published inHuman Studies 11, 271–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, Eric: 1986,The Ethnomethodological Foundations of Mathematics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, Elizabeth: 1979,Eyewitness Identification, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, Griscom: 1950,Audubon's Birds of America, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael: 1985a,Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael: 1985b, ‘Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility’,Social Studies of Science 15, 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael: 1990a, ‘The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 153–186. Previously published inHuman Studies 11, 201–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael: 1990b, ‘Laboratory Space and the Technological Complex: An Investigation of Topical Contextures’,Science in Context 4, 81–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael, Eric Livingston, and Harold Garfiinkel: 1983, ‘Tgemporal Order in Laboratory Work’, in K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds.),Science Obseved: Persperctives on the Social Study of Scienc, Sage Publications, London and Beverly Hills, pp. 205–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael, and Samuel Edgerton: 1988, ‘Aesthetics and Digital Image Processing’, in G. Fyfe and J. Law (eds.),Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 184–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael, and Steve Woolgar (eds.): 1990,Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Previously published as a special issue ofHuman Studies 11, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl: 1936,Ideology and Utopia, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Morrison, Kenneth: 1981, ‘Some Properties of “Telling Order Designs” in Didactic Inquiry’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Greg: 1990, ‘Every Picture Tells a Story: Illustrations in E. O. Wilson'sSociobiology’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 231–265. Previously published inHuman Studies 11, 235–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhall, Beaumont: 1964,The History of Photography, Museum of Modern Art, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Roger Tory: 1980,A Field Guide to the Birds, 4th Edition, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew: 1986,Constructing Quarks, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew (ed.): in press, 1991,Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, Trevor: 1985, ‘Towards an Analysis of Scientific Observation: The Externality and Evidential Significance of Observation Reports in Physics’,Social Studies of Science 15, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, Martin: 1985,The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge Among Gentlemanly Specialists, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson: 1974, ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation’,Language 50, 697–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer: 1985,Leviathan and the Air-Pump, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan Leigh: forthcoming, ‘Layered Space, Formal Representations and Long-Distance Control: The Politics of Information’, to appear inFundamentia Scietiae.

  • Sudnow, David: 1972, ‘Temporal Parameters of Interpersonal Observation’, in D. Saudnow (ed.),Studies in Social Interaction, Free Press, NY, pp. 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, Edward R.: 1983,The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Cheshire, Conn., Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1958,Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, Steve: 1990, ‘Time and Documents in Researcher Interaction: Some Ways of Making out What Is Happening in Experimental Science’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 123–152. Previously published inHuman Studies Studies 11, 171–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lynch, M. Science in the age of mechanical reproduction: moral and epistemic relations between diagrams and photographs. Biol Philos 6, 205–226 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426838

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426838

Key words

Navigation