Skip to main content
Log in

Curve It, Gauge It, or Leave It? Practical Underdetermination in Gravitational Theories

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four empirically equivalent versions of general relativity, namely standard GR, Lorentz-invariant gravitational theory,and the gravitational gauge theories of the Lorentz and translation groups, are investigated in the form of a case study for theory underdetermination. The various ontological indeterminacies (both underdetermination and inscrutability of reference) inherent in gravitational theories are analyzed in a detailed comparative study. The concept of practical underdetermination is proposed, followed by a discussion of its adequacy to describe scientific progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Auyang, S. Y.: 1995, How is Quantum Field Theory Possibleč Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, J. B.: 1967, Zur Herleitung der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie aus den Prinzipien klassischer lorentzinvarianter Feldtheorien. PhD thesis, Universität zu Köln.

  • Callender, C. and Huggett, N.: 2001, Physics meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Callender, C. and Weingard, R.: (2000), ‘Topology Change and the Unity of Space’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31, 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y. M., 1976, ‘Einstein Lagrangian as the translational Yang-Mills Lagrangian’, Physical Review D 14(10), 2521–2525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J.: 2002, ‘Gauge Matters’, Philosophy of Science 69(3), S209–S220 (Supplement).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eynck, T. O., Lyre, H. and Rummell, N. v.: 2001, A versus B! Topological nonseparability and the Aharonov-Bohm effect, Conference lecture at “Quantum Structures V”, Italy. (E-print PITT-PHIL-SCI00000404).

  • Feynman, R. P., Morinigo, F. B. nd Wagner, W.G.: 1995, Feynman Lectures on Gravitation, California Institute of Technology.

  • Gardner, M.: 1952, Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science, Dover, New York, (Second edition 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C.: 1973, ‘Topology, Cosmology and Convention’, in P. Suppes (ed.), Space, Time and Geometry, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gronwald, F.: 1998, ‘A Note on Gauge Covariant Translations in the Gauge Approach to Gravity’, Acta Physica Polonica B 29(4), 1121–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. N.: 1952, Quantization of Einstein's Gravitational Field: Linear Approximation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 65A, 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. N.: 1957, ‘Einstein's and Other Theories of Gravitation’, Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehl, F. W.: 1981, ‘Zur Eichfeldtheorie der Gravitation’, in J. Nitsch, J. Pfarr and E.-W. Stachow (eds), Grundlagenprobleme der modernen Physik, B.I.-Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hehl, F.W., Heyde, P. v.d., Kerlick, G. D. and Nester, J. M.: 1976, ‘General Relativity with Spin and Torsion: Foundations and Prospects’, Reviews of Modern Physics 48, 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehl, F. W., McCrea, J. D., Mielke, E. W. and Ne'eman, Y.: 1995, ‘Metric-Affine Gauge Theory of Gravity: Field Equations, Noether Identities, World Spinors, and Breaking of Dilation Invariance’, Physics Reports 258, 1–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehl, F.W., Nitsch, J. and Heyde, P. v.d.: 1980, Gravitation and the Poincaré Gauge Field Theory with Quadratic Lagrangian, in Held (1980).

  • Held, A.: 1980, General Relativity and Gravitation: One Hundred Years after the Birth of Albert Einstein, Plenum Press, New York, 2 Volumes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoefer, C. and Rosenberg, A.: 1994, ‘Empirical Equivalence, Underdetermination, and Systems of the World’, Philosophy of Science 61, 592–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanenko, D. and Sardanashvily, G.: 1983, ‘The Gauge Treatment of Gravity’, Physics Reports 94(1): 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibble, T. W. B.: 1961, ‘Lorentz Invariance and the Gravitational Field’, Journal of Mathematical Physics 2: 212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukla, A.: 1993, ‘Laudan, Leplin, Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination’, Analysis 53: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. and Leplin, J.: 1991, ‘Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination’, Journal of Philosophy 88, 449–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leplin, J. and Laudan, L.: 1993, ‘Determination Underdeterred: Reply to Kukla’, Analysis 53, 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C.: 2001, Gauge Gravity and the Unification of Natural Forces, (E-print PITT-PHILSCI00000364).

  • Lyre, H.: 1999, Gauges, Holes, and their ‘Connections’, Conference lecture at “History and Foundations of General Relativity 5”, Notre Dame, Indiana. (E-print gr-qc/9904036).

  • Lyre, H.: 2000, ‘A Generalized Equivalence Principle’, International Journal of Modern Physics D 9(6): 633–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyre, H.: 2001, ‘The Principles of Gauging’, Philosophy of Science 68(3): S371–S381 (Supplement).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, E. W.: 1987, Geometrodynamics of Gauge Fields. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P. and Barbour, J. B.: 1967, ‘On the Geometrical Interpretation of the Theory of Gravitation in Flat Space’, Zeitschrift für Physik 203, 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ne'eman, Y.: 1980, Gravity, Groups, and Gauges, in Held, 1980.

  • O'Raifeartaigh, L.: 1995, The Dawning of Gauge Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Raifeartaigh, L. and Straumann, L.: 2000, ‘Gauge Theory: Historical Origins and Some Modern Developments’, Reviews of Modern Physics 72(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1960, Word and Object, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1975, ‘On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World’, Erkenntnis 9, 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1990, ‘Three Indeterminacies’, in R. B. Barrett and R. F. Gibson (eds), Perspectives on Quine, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciama, D.W.: 1962, ‘On the Analogy between Charge and Spin in General Relativity’, in Recent Developments in General Relativity, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexl, R. U.: 1983, ‘Die Hohlwelttheorie’, Der mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht 36(8), 453–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, P. K.: 2001, ‘Refusing the Devil's Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriouslyč’, Philosophy of Science 68(3), S1–S12 (Supplement).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirring, W.: 1959, ‘Lorentz-invariante Gravitationstheorien’, Fortschritte der Physik 7, 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirring, W.: 1961, ‘An Alternative Approach to the Theory of Gravitation’, Annals of Physics 16, 96–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautman, A.: 1980, Fiber Bundles, Gauge Fields, and Gravitation, in Held (1980).

  • Utiyama, R.: 1956, ‘Invariant Theoretical Interpretation of Interaction’, Physical Review 101(5), 1597–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utiyama, R.: 1980, ‘Introduction to the Theory of General Gauge Fields’, Progress of Theoretical Physics 64(6), 2207–2221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. C.: 1980, The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, S.: 1999, ‘Gravity and Gauge Theory’, Philosophy of Science 66(3), S146–S155 (Supplement).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H.: 1929, ‘Elektron und Gravitation’, Zeitschrift für Physik, 330–352.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyre, H., Eynck, T.O. Curve It, Gauge It, or Leave It? Practical Underdetermination in Gravitational Theories. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34, 277–303 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JGPS.0000005161.79937.ab

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JGPS.0000005161.79937.ab

Navigation