Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilities For Two Properties

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let R(X, B) denote the class of probability functions that are defined on algebra X and that represent rationally permissible degrees of certainty for a person whose total relevant background evidence is B. This paper is concerned with characterizing R(X, B) for the case in whichX is an algebra of propositions involving two properties and B is empty. It proposes necessary conditions for a probability function to be in R(X, B), some of which involve the notion of statistical dependence. The class of probability functions that satisfy these conditions, here denoted PI, includes a class that Carnap once proposed for the same situation. Probability functions in PI violate Carnap's axiom of analogy but, it is argued, that axiom should be rejected. A derivation of Carnap's model by Hesse has limitations that are not present in the derivation of PI given here. Various alternative probability models are considered and rejected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Albert, J. H. and A. K. Gupta: 1983, 'Bayesian Estimation Methods for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables Using Mixtures of Dirichlet Distributions', Journal of the American Statistical Association 78, 708-717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1945, 'On Inductive Logic', Philosophy of Science 12, 72-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1950, Logical Foundations of Probability, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Second edition 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1952, The Continuum of Inductive Methods, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1963a, 'Intellectual Autobiography', in Schilpp (ed.), 1963, pp. 1-84.

  • Carnap, R.: 1963b, 'Replies and Systematic Expositions', in Schilpp (ed.), 1963, pp. 859-1013.

  • Carnap, R.: 1975, 'Notes on Probability and Induction', in J. Hintikka (ed.), Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 293-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1980, 'A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part II', in Jeffrey (ed.), 1980, pp. 7-155.

  • Carnap, R. and R. C. Jeffrey (eds.): 1971, Studies in Inductive Logik and Probability, Vol. 1, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, P. and W. Stegmüller: 1959, Induktive Logik und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Springer, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini, D.: 1983, 'Analogy by Similarity', Erkenntnis 20, 103-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini, D. and U. Garibaldi: 1997, 'Predictive Laws of Association in Statistics and Physics', Erkenntnis 45, 399-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Maio, M. C.: 1995, 'Predictive Probability and Analogy by Similarity in Inductive Logic', Erkenntnis 43, 369-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. D. and S. E. Fienberg: 1992, 'Bayesian Estimation in Multidimensional Contingency Tables', in P. K. Goel and N. S. Iyengar (eds.), Bayesian Analysis in Statistics and Econometrics, Springer, New York, pp. 27-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa, R.: 1993, Optimum Inductive Methods, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa, R.: 1997, 'Analogy and Exchangeability in Predictive Inferences', Erkenntnis 45, 89-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, T. L.: 1973, Theories of Probability, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J.: 1965, The Estimation of Probabilities, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M.: 1964, 'Analogy and Confirmation Theory', Philosophy of Science 31, 319-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and I. Niiniluoto: 1976, 'An Axiomatic Foundation for the Logic of Inductive Generalization', in M. Przełęcki, K. Szaniawski, and R. Wójcicki (eds.), Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 57-81. Reprinted in Jeffrey (ed.) (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R. C. (ed.): 1980, Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 2, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1984, 'Two Types of Inductive Analogy by Similarity', Erkenntnis 21, 63-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latorre, G.: 1984, 'Bayesian Inference in 2 × 2 and 2 × 2 × 2 Contingency Tables', Metron 42, 169-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V.: 1964, 'The Bayesian Analysis of Contingency Tables', Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34, 1622-1643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1981, 'Analogy and Inductive Logic', Erkenntnis 16, 1-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1988, 'Analogy and Similarity in Scientific Reasoning', in D. H. Helman (ed.), Analogical Reasoning, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 271-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilpp, P. A. (ed.): 1963, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, La Salle, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B.: 1993, 'Analogy by Similarity in Hyper-Carnapian Inductive Logic', in J. Earman, A. I. Janis, G. Massey, and N. Rescher (eds.), Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 273-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, W.: 1981, 'Analogy and Inductive Logic: A Note on Niiniluoto', Erkenntnis 16, 35-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, S. S.: 1962, Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabell, S. L.: 1997, 'Confirming Universal Generalizations', Erkenntnis 45, 267-283.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maher, P. Probabilities For Two Properties. Erkenntnis 52, 63–91 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005557828204

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005557828204

Keywords

Navigation