Moral Explanation and the Special Sciences

  • Majors B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

[Discussion of moral explanation has reached an impasse, with proponents of contemporary ethical naturalism upholding the explanatory integrity of moral facts and properties, and opponents - including both anti-realists and non-naturalistic realists - insisting that such robustly explanatory pretensions as moral theory has be explained away. I propose that the key to solving the problem lies in the question whether instances of moral properties are causally efficacious. It is argued that, given the truth of contemporary ethical naturalism, moral properties are causally efficacious if the properties of the special sciences are. Certain objections are rebutted involving the nature of causation, on the one hand, and putative special features of the moral realm, on the other.]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Majors, B. (2003). Moral Explanation and the Special Sciences. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 113(2), 121–152. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4321353

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free