Skip to main content
Log in

Logical questions behind the lottery and preface paradoxes: lossy rules for uncertain inference

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We reflect on lessons that the lottery and preface paradoxes provide for the logic of uncertain inference. One of these lessons is the unreliability of the rule of conjunction of conclusions in such contexts, whether the inferences are probabilistic or qualitative; this leads us to an examination of consequence relations without that rule, the study of other rules that may nevertheless be satisfied in its absence, and a partial rehabilitation of conjunction as a ‘lossy’ rule. A second lesson is the possibility of rational inconsistent belief; this leads us to formulate criteria for deciding when an inconsistent set of beliefs may reasonably be retained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams E. W. (1966) Probability and the logic of conditionals. In: Hintikka J. K. K., Suppes P. (eds) Aspects of inductive logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 265–316

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Adams E. W. (1975) The logic of conditionals. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams E. W. (1996) Four probability-preserving properties of inferences. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25: 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams E. W. (1998) A primer of probability logic. CSLI, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boole G. (1854) Laws of thought. Dover, New York (Reprinted, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne J. (1996) On the logic of nonmonotonic conditionals and conditional probabilities. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25: 185–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne J., Makinson D. (2007) The quantitative/qualitative watershed for rules of uncertain inference. Studia Logica 86: 249–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson M., Parikh R. (2008) Probabilistic conditionals are almost monotonic. The Review of Symbolic Logic 1: 73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S., Lehmann D., Magidor M. (1990) Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence 44: 167–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg H. E. (1961) Probability and the logic of rational belief. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, H. E. (1963). Probability and randomness. Theoria, 29, 27–55 (Reprinted from Kyburg, H. E. (1983). Epistemology and Inference (Minneapolis: Minnesota Press)).

  • Kyburg H. E. (1970a) Probability and inductive logic. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg H. E. (1970b) Conjunctivitis. In: Swain M. (eds) Induction, acceptance and rational belief. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 55–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg H. E. (1997) The rule of adjunction and reasonable inference. The Journal of Philosophy 94: 109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makinson D. (1965) The paradox of the preface. Analysis 25: 205–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makinson D. (2005) Bridges from classical to nonmonotonic logic. College Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinson, D. (2011). Conditional probability in the light of qualitative belief change. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40, 121–153. A preliminary version appeared in Hosni & Montagna (Eds.), Probability, Uncertainty and Rationality vol 10, Springer: CRM Series, Edizioni della Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris J., Simmonds R. (2009) O is not enough. Review of Symbolic Logic 2: 298–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. et al (1989) Probabilistic semantics for nonmonotonic reasoning: A survey. In: Brachman H. (eds) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, pp 505–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1929). Knowledge. Manuscript published posthumously in R. B. Braithwaite (Ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays (pp. 258–259). London: Routlege and Kegan Paul, 1931. Most recently republished in D. H. Mellor (Ed.), F.P. Ramsey: Philosophical papers (pp. 110–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

  • Schlechta K. (2004) Coherent systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham Y. (1988) Reasoning about change. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, J. (1876). The logic of chance (2nd ed). London: Macmillan. The passage from chapter XIV section 36 cited in the first appendix above did not occur in the first edition of 1866; but it is preserved in the third edition of 1886 (reissued in 2006 by New York: Dover Publications), where it is moved to section 33 of the same chapter.

  • Wheeler G. (2007) A review of the lottery paradox. In: Harper W. L., Wheeler G. (eds) Probability and inference: Essays in honour of Henry E. Kyburg. Jr. College Publications, London, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Makinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makinson, D. Logical questions behind the lottery and preface paradoxes: lossy rules for uncertain inference. Synthese 186, 511–529 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9997-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9997-2

Keywords

Navigation