Abstract
In Providence and Evil Peter Geach says: ‘What we cannot hope to understand in this life is sin. Sin is the surd or absurd element in the universe’ (1977, p. 63). Geach goes on to present a most interesting analogy between philosophical confusion and sin.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cornford, F.M.: 1935, Plato’s Theory of Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Geach, P.T.: 1977, Providence and Evil, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Moore, G. E.: 1953, Some Main Problems of Philosophy, Allen and Unwin, London.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1958, Philosophical Investigations (Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1960, The Blue and Brown Books, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1967, Zettel (Edited by G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright; translated by G. E. M. Anscombe), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1969, On Certainty (Edited by G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright; translated by Denis Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Malcolm, N. (1991). Philosophical Confusion and Sin. In: Lewis, H.A. (eds) Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters. Synthese Library, vol 213. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7885-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7885-1_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4072-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7885-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive