Skip to main content
Log in

“Loyals” and “Optimizers”: Shedding Light on the Decision for or Against Organic Agriculture Among Swiss Farmers

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The choice between organic and conventional agriculture for farmers is modeled as an ethical decision. Farmers are either loyal to one of the systems or they optimize between systems. This model is empirically validated through a survey among Swiss farmers. A cluster analysis separates farmers into loyal organic, loyal conventional, and optimizing farmers. However, the three resulting clusters bore some, but not all the necessary characteristics of “optimizers” and “loyals.” A probit analysis shows that loyal farmers have larger farms than optimizers. Loyal organic farmers receive less direct payments than optimizers, which confirms the utility-maximizing pattern of the latter group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aeberhard, A., & Rist, S. (2009). Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1171–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blay-Palmer, A. (2005). Growing innovation policy: The case of organic agriculture in Ontario, Canada. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(4), 557–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constance, D. H., & Choi, J. Y. (2010). Overcoming the barriers to organic adoption in the United States: A look at pragmatic conventional producers in Texas. Sustainability, 2(1), 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer, I., Schneeberger, W., & Freyer, B. (2005). Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria: Farmer types and their rationale. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diederen, P., van Meijl, H., Wolters, A., & Bijak, K. (2003). Innovation adoption in agriculture: Innovators, early adopters and laggards. Cahiers d’economie et sociologie rurales, 67(1), 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. (1999). Understanding how farmers choose between organic and conventional production: Results from New Zealand and policy implications. Agriculture and Human Values, 16(1), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferjani, A., & Köhler, T. (2007). Welches sind die Bestimmungsfaktoren für den Arbeitsverdienst? Agrarforschung, 14(8), 288–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2004). Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N., & Milne, J. (1996). Ethical beliefs and behaviour in contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39(2), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanein, N. (1999). Changing the way America farms. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, J., & Rahmann, G. (2005). Ende der Nische–Beiträge zur 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau.. Kassel: Kassel University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirner, L., Vogel, S., & Schneeberger, W. (2005). Ausstiegsabsichten und tatsächliche Ausstiegsgründe von Biobauern und Biobäuerinnen in Österreich—Analyse von Befragungsergebnissen. In: J. Heß & G. Rahmann (Hrsg.), Ende der Nische, Beiträge zur 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Kassel: kassel university press GmbH.

  • Kirton, M. J. (1992). Adopters and innovators: Problem solving in organizations. In S. S. Gryskiewicz & D. A. Hills (Eds.), Readings in innovation. New York: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latacz-Lohmann, U., & Foster, C. (1997). From “niche” to “mainstream”—strategies for marketing organic food in Germany and the UK. British Food Journal, 99(8), 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lips, M., & Eggimann, H. (2007). Erreichen Biobetriebe höhere Arbeitseinkommen? Agrarforschung, 14(8), 338–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. (2003). Why organic food in Germany is a merit good. Food Policy, 28(5/6), 459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayerfeld Bell, M. (2004). Farming for us all. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E., Sullivan, S., Erickson, D., & DeYoung, R. (1997). Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(1), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., & Miele, M. (2004). The new aesthetic of food? Relational reflexivity in the ‘alternative’ food movement. In M. Harvey, A. McMeekin, & A. Warde (Eds.), Qualities of food. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niggli, U. (1997). Eidgenossen bleiben Spitze. Ökologie und Landbau, 141(1), 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitzan, S., & Paroush, J. (1982). Optimal decision rules in uncertain dichotomous choice situations. International Economic Review, 23(2), 289–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padel, S. (2001). Conversion to organic farming—a typical example of the diffusion of an innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 41(1), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regouin, E. (2003). To convert or not to convert to organic farming. In OECD (Ed.), Organic agriculture. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reissig, L., Ferjani, A., & Zimmermann, A. (2009). Ausstieg aus dem Biolandbau–steigende Tendenz in der Schweiz. Agrarforschung, 16(4), 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouvinen, P. (2002). Characteristics of product and process innovators: some evidence from the Finnish innovation survey. Applied Economics Letters, 9(9), 575–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, J. (2005). Der Ausstieg aus dem Biolandbau in Österreich—Ergebnisse einer Befragung. Universität für Bodenkultur Wien Department für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. Institut für Agrar- und Forstökonomie. Wien: BOKU.

  • Shapiro, C. (1989). The theory of business strategy. Rand Journal of Economics, 20(1), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Søgaard Jørgensen, M. (2007). Organic food in Denmark–from grass root initiative to market niche. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 6(5), 381–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spash, C. L., & Hanley, N. (1995). Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation. Ecological Economics, 12(2), 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R. (1924). Geisteswissenschaftliche Grundlagen zum Gedeihen der Landwirtschaft. Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, T. H., Echeverria, J., Glass, R. J., Hager, T., & More, T. A. (1991). Measuring the existence value of wildlife: What do CVM estimates really show? Land Economics, 67(4), 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. D. (1998). Consumer demand for organic food: What we know and what we need to know. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(5), 1113–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregear, A., Dent, J. B., & McGregor, M. J. (1994). The demand for organically grown produce. British Food Journal, 96(4), 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Mann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mann, S., Gairing, M. “Loyals” and “Optimizers”: Shedding Light on the Decision for or Against Organic Agriculture Among Swiss Farmers. J Agric Environ Ethics 25, 365–376 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9309-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9309-3

Keywords

Navigation