Skip to main content
Log in

Computing with Cylindric Modal Logics and Arrow Logics, Lower Bounds

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The complexity of the satisfiability problems of various arrow logics and cylindric modal logics is determined. As is well known, relativising these logics makes them decidable. There are several parameters that can be set in such a relativisation. We focus on the following three: the number of variables involved, the similarity type and the kind of relativised models considered. The complexity analysis shows the importance and relevance of these parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AndrÉka, H., I. Hodkinson, and I. NÉmeti, 'Finite algebras of relations are representable on finite sets', Journal of Symbolic Logic 64:243-267, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher, M., and R. Ladner, 'Propositional dynamic logic of regular programs', J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 18:194-211, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GrÄdel, E., 'On the restraining power of guards', Journal of Symbolic Logic 64:1719-1742, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Halpern, J. Y., and Y. O. Moses, 'A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief', Artificial Intelligence 54:319-379, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ladner, R., 'The computational complexity of provability in systems of modal propositional logic', SIAM Journal of Computing 6:467-480, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marx, M., and Sz. MikulÁs, 'Decidability of cylindric set algebras of dimension 2 and first order logic with two variables', Journal of Symbolic Logic 64:1563-1572, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marx, M., L. PÓlos, and M. Masuch (eds.), Arrow Logic and Multimodal Logics, Studies in Logic, Language and Information, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marx, M., and Y. Venema, Multi-dimensional Modal Logic, Applied Logic Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.

  9. MikulÁs, Sz., and M. Marx, 'Undecidable relativizations of algebras of relations', Journal of Symbolic Logic 64:747-760, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. NÉmeti, I., 'A fine-structure analysis of first-order logic', In M. Masuch (eds.), Arrow Logic and Multimodal Logics, Studies in Logic, Language and Information, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996 [7], pp. 221-247.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spaan, E., 'Complexity of modal logics', PhD thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, 1993.

  12. Tarski, A., and S. Givant, A Formalization of Set Theory without Variables, AMS Colloquium Publications 41, Providence, Rhode Island, 1987.

  13. Van Benthem, J., Modal Logic and Classical Logic, Bibliopolis, Naples, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Benthem, J., Exploring Logical Dynamics, Studies in Logic, Language and Information, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vardi, M., 'Why is modal logic so robustly decidable?', In DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 31, American Math. Society, 1997, pp. 149-184.

  16. Venema, Y., 'Two-dimensional modal logics for relational algebras and temporal logic of intervals', ITLI-prepublication series LP-89-03, University of Amsterdam, 1989.

  17. Venema, Y., 'Many-dimensional modal logic', PhD thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, 1992.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marx, M. Computing with Cylindric Modal Logics and Arrow Logics, Lower Bounds. Studia Logica 72, 233–252 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021360511488

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021360511488

Navigation