Skip to main content
Log in

Scientific Discovery on Positive Data via Belief Revision

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model of inductive inquiry is defined within a first-order context. Intuitively, the model pictures inquiry as a game between Nature and a scientist. To begin the game, a nonlogical vocabulary is agreed upon by the two players along with a partition of a class of structures for that vocabulary. Next, Nature secretly chooses one structure (“the real world”) from some cell of the partition. She then presents the scientist with a sequence of atomic facts about the chosen structure. With each new datum the scientist announces a guess about the cell to which the chosen structure belongs. To succeed in his inquiry, the scientist's successive conjectures must be correct all but finitely often, that is, the conjectures must converge in the limit to the correct cell. A special kind of scientist selects his hypotheses on the basis of a belief revision operator. We show that reliance on belief revision allows scientists to solve a wide class of problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Cohen, L. J., An Essay on Belief and Acceptance, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J., Bayes or Bust? MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. D., Flum, J. and Thomas, W., Mathematical Logic, 2nd edn, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.

  • Gärdenfors, P., Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (ed.), Belief Revision, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. O., Kernel contraction, J. Symbolic Logic 59(3) (1994), 845-859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S.O., A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Osherson, D., Royer, J. and Sharma, A., Systems that Learn, 2nd edn, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keisler, H. J., Fundamentals of model theory, in J. Barwise (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 47-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. T., The Logic of Reliable Inquiry, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S., The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I., The Enterprise of Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. and Osherson, D., Elements of Scientific Inquiry, MIT Press, 1998.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, E., Osherson, D. Scientific Discovery on Positive Data via Belief Revision. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29, 483–506 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026569206678

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026569206678

Navigation