Skip to main content
Log in

A Defense of Humeanism from Nagel's Persimmon

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper defends Humeanism: the view that an agent has a reason for an intentional action if and only if it fulfills, or is a means to fulfilling, a current desire of that agent. Thomas Nagel presents an example involving a short-lived desire for eating a persimmon tomorrow. He claims that, contrary to Humeanism, this example is a clear case of irrationality. Furthermore, the Humean cannot simply dismiss all current desires with future objects, because desires of this sort are crucial to the Humean account of prudence. I respond that, correctly understood, Humeanism can simultaneously account for prudent conduct and other conduct motivated by present desires with future objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Fehige, C.: 2001, 'Instrumentalism', in E. Millgram (ed.), Varieties of Practical Reasoning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D.: 1986, Morals By Agreement, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1970, The Possibility of Altruism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D.: 1984, Reasons and Persons, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller, Christian: 1997, 'Humeanism and Prudence' in K. Lehrer and J. Marek (eds.), Austrian Philosophy: Past and Present, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston, pp. 189-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael: 1994, The Moral Problem, Blackwell, Oxford UK/Cambridge MA.

  • Tichy, P. and Oddie, G.: 1983, 'Ability and freedom', American Philosophical Quarterly 20(2), 135-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trebilcot, Joyce: 1974, 'Aprudentialism', American Philosophical Quarterly 11(3), 203-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. Jay: 1990, 'How to Argue about Practical Reason', Mind 99, 355-385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weirich, Paul: 1981, 'A Bias of Rationality', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59(1), 31-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard: 1976, 'Persons, Character and Morality' in A. O. Rorty (ed.), The Identities of Persons, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard: 1980, 'Internal and External Reasons' in Ross Harrison (ed.), Rational Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maslen, C. A Defense of Humeanism from Nagel's Persimmon. Erkenntnis 57, 41–46 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020190012498

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020190012498

Keywords

Navigation