Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do Complex Moral Reasoners Experience Greater Ethical Work Conflict?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individuals who disagree that organizational interests legitimately supersede those of the wider society may experience conflict between their personal standards of ethics and those demanded by an employing organization, a conflict that is well documented. An additional question is whether or not individuals capable of complex moral reasoning experience greater conflict than those reasoning at a less developed level. This question was first positioned in a theoretical framework and then investigated using 115 survey responses from a student sample. Correlational analysis and hierarchical regression indicated that individuals scoring high on the Defining Issues Test measure of Kohlberg's stages of moral development experienced significantly greater workplace ethical conflict than low scorers. The finding that complex moral reasoners perceive greater conflict between their personal standards and typical organizational demands raises the issue of what reasoning orientation is rewarded in organizations. Individuals capable of complex moral reasoning may be likely to leave traditional organizations due to high conflict but more ‘ethically friendly’ organizations for complex reasoners seem unlikely unless these people occupy influential positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davison, M. L.: 1979, ‘The Internal Structure and the Psychometric Properties of the Defining Issues Test’, in J. R. Rest (ed.), Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), pp. 223–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970 (September 13), ‘A Friedman Doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times Magazine 32–33, 122–126.

  • Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elm, D. R. and J. Weber: 1994, ‘Measuring Moral Judgment: The Moral Judgment Interview or the Defining Issues Test?’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 341–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froelich, K. S. and J. L. Kottke: 1991, ‘Measuring Individual Beliefs About Organizational Ethics’, Educational and Psychological Measurement 51, 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves S. B. and S. A. Waddock: 1994, ‘Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 37, 1034–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiner, R. A.: 1983, ‘The Origin of Predictable Behavior’, American Economic Review 73, 560–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics’, Academy of Management Review 20, 404–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1976, ‘Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach’, in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York), pp. 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. W. and T. R. Mitchell: 1994, ‘An Alterative Approach: The Unfolding of Voluntary Employee Turnover’ Academy of Management Review 19, 51–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudrack, P. E. and E. S. Mason: 1996, ‘Individual Ethical Beliefs and Perceived Organizational Interests’ Journal of Business Ethics 15, 851–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, B. Z. and W. H. Schmidt: 1985, ‘Ethics in American Companies: A Managerial Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D. P. and T. M. Jones: 1995, ‘An Agent Morality View of Business Policy’, Academy of Management Review 20, 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1994, ‘Background: Theory and Research’, in J. R. Rest and D. Narvaez (eds.), Moral Development in the Professions (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: New Jersey), pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, H. Y. and G. Y. Shiu: 1990, ‘Attitudes Towards Corporate Social Responsibility and Perceived Importance of Social Responsibility Information Characteristics in a Decision Context’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walking, R. A. and M. S. Long: 1984, ‘Agency Theory, Managerial Welfare, and Takeover Bid Resistance’, Rand Journal of Economics 15, 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1990, ‘Managers' Moral Reasoning: Assessing Their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas’, Human Relations 43, 687–702.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Marketing, and HRM, Faculty of Business, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada, L2S 3A1

    E. Sharon Mason & Peter E. Mudrack

Authors
  1. E. Sharon Mason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter E. Mudrack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason, E.S., Mudrack, P.E. Do Complex Moral Reasoners Experience Greater Ethical Work Conflict?. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1311–1318 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005706318791

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005706318791

Keywords

Search

Navigation