Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal semantics in a superficially tenseless language

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper contributes to the debate about ‘tenseless languages’ by defending a tensed analysis of a superficially tenseless language. The language investigated is St’át’imcets (Lillooet Salish). I argue that although St’át’imcets lacks overt tense morphology, every finite clause in the language possesses a phonologically covert tense morpheme; this tense morpheme restricts the reference time to being non-future. Future interpretations, as well as ‘past future’ would-readings, are obtained by the combination of covert tense with an operator analogous to Abusch’s (1985) WOLL. I offer St’át’imcets-internal evidence (of a kind not previously adduced) that the WOLL-like operator is modal in nature. It follows from the analysis presented here that there are only two (probably related) differences between St’át’imcets and English in the area of tense. The first is that St’át’imcets lacks tense morphemes which are pronounced. The second is that the St’át’imcets tense morpheme is semantically underspecified compared to English ones. In each of these respects, the St’át’imcets tense morpheme displays similar properties to pronouns, which may be covert and which may fail to distinguish person, number or gender. Along the way, I point out several striking and subtle similarities in the interpretive possibilities of St’át’imcets and English. I suggest that these similarities may reveal non-accidental properties of tense systems in natural language. I conclude with discussion of the implications of the analysis for cross-linguistic variation, learnability and the possible existence of tenseless languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abusch, D. (1985). On verbs and time. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Abusch D. (1988). Sequence of tense, intensionality and scope. Proceedings of WCCFL 7: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Abusch D. (1997). Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 1–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abusch D. (1998). Generalizing tense semantics for future contexts. In: Rothstein S. (ed). Events and grammar. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 13–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker M., Travis L. (1997). Mood as verbal definiteness in a “tenseless” language. NLS 5: 213–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-el, L. (2005). Aspectual distinctions in Skwxwú7mesh. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia.

  • Bar-el, L. Davis, H., & Matthewson, L. (2005). On non-culminating accomplishments. In Proceedings of NELS (Vol. 35). Amherst, MA: GLSA.

  • Bar-el L., Gillon C., Jacobs P., Watt L., Wiltschko M. (2004). Subject clitics and their effect on temporal interpretation: A case study of Skxwú7mesh and Stó:lo Halq’eméylem. In: Gerdts D., Matthewson L. (eds). Studies in Salish linguistics in honor of M. Dale Kinkade. Missoula, University of Montana Press, pp. 8–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix E. (1998). Irrealis as category, meaning, or reference. Anthropological Linguistics 40: 245–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner M. (2005a). Future discourse in a tenseless language. Journal of Semantics 22: 339–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M. (2005b). The grammar of time reference in Yukatek Maya. Class handout, Rutgers. http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~bittner

  • Bittner, M. (2006). Aspectual universals of temporal anaphora. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Bohnemeyer, J. (2002). The grammar of time reference in Yukatek Maya. Lincom Europa.

  • Bohnemeyer J., Swift M. (2004). Event realization and default aspect. L& P 27: 263–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee J. (1998). “Irrealis” as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics 40: 257–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan C. (1998). Lake Miwok irrealis. Anthropological Linguistics 40: 228–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Mouton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung S., Timberlake A. (1985). Tense, aspect and mood. In: Shopen T. (ed). Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge, Camb. Univ. Press., Vol. 3, pp. 202–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie B. (1989). On identifying future tenses. In: Abraham W., Janssen T. (eds). Tempus, aspekt, modus: Die lexicalischen und grammatischen formen in den Germanischen sprachen. Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Condoravdi, C. (2003). Modalities for the future. Paper presented at UC Santa Cruz.

  • Copley, B. (2002). The semantics of the future. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Cowper E. (2005). The geometry of interpretable features: Infl in English and Spanish. Language 81: 10–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsen-Nielsen, N. (1987). Has English a future? In I. Lindblad & M. Ljung (Eds.), Proceedings from the third Nordic conference for English studies, Hässelby, (Vol. 1, pp. 53–59). Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.

  • Davis, H. (2004). VP-ellipsis in St’át’imcets and its implications. In Papers for the 39th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, (pp. 117–140). Vancouver: UPBWPL.

  • Davis, H. & Matthewson, L. (2003). A note on remote: The temporal enclitic tu7 in St’át’imcets. In Papers for the 38th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Déchaine, R.-M., & Manfredi, V. (2000). Interpreting null tense. Paper presented at the Roundtable on the Syntax of Tense and Aspect, U.Paris-3 and U.Paris-7.

  • Dowty D. (1977). Towards a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English “imperfective” progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 45–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty D. (1979). Word meaning and montague grammar. Dordrecht, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç M. (1996). Tense and modality. In: Lappin S. (ed). Handbook of semantic theory. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 345–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank B., Whitley R.A. (1994). Preserving Salmon at home. Lillooet, BC, Upper St’át’imc Language, Culture and Education Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, N., & Speas, M. (1986). Specifiers and projections. MITWPL, 8, 128–172. Cambridge, MA.

  • Hayashi, M. (2006). Syntax of tense in Inuktitut. Paper presented at the 11th Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas, University of British Columbia.

  • Hayashi, M., & Spreng, B. (2005). Is Inuktitut tenseless? In Proceedings of the 2005 annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association. University of Ottawa: Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa.

  • Heim, I. (1994). Comments on Abusch’s theory of tense. Ms., MIT.

  • Hofling C. (1998). Irrealis and perfect in Itzaj Maya. Anthropological Linguistics 40: 214–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein N. (1990). As time goes by: Tense and universal grammar. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou S. (2000). The grammatical ingredients of coutnerfactuality. LI 31: 231–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London, Allen and Unwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp H. (1971). Formal properties of ‘now’. Theoria 37: 227–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennerly, J., Marceau, C., Old Person, D., & Tatsey, J. (no date). Old man Napi. Lillooet, BC: Upper St’át’imc Language Program (Translated into St’át’imcets by Beverley Frank).

  • Kinkade M.D. (1998). Is Irrealis a grammatical category in Upper Chehalis?. Anthropological Linguistics 40: 234–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinkade, M. D. (2001). Proto-Salish irrealis. In Papers for the 36th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages (pp. 189–200). Vancouver, BC: UBCWPL.

  • Kiyota, M. (2004). Aspectual classification of verbs in [Saanich]. In Papers for the 39th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages (pp. 253–268). Vancouver, BC: UBC Working Papers in Linguistics 14.

  • Kiyota, M. (in press). Semantics of the particle [kwlh] and event representations in [Saanich]. In Proceedings of the workshop on structure and constituency in languages of the Americas (Vol. 11). Vancouver, BC: UBC Working Papers in Linguistics 19.

  • Kiyota, M. (in prep). Aspect in Saanich and Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia.

  • Klein W. (1994). Time in language. London, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinedinst, N. (2005). Plurals, modals, and conjunctive disjunction. Paper presented at Sinn und Bedeutung 10.

  • Kratzer A. (1991). Modality. In: von Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds). Semantik. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 825–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer A. (1998). More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. SALT VIII: 92–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber P. (1999). The Salish language family: Reconstructing syntax. Lincoln and London, The University of Nebraska Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw W. (1977). Some problems with tense in PTQ. Texas Linguistic Forum 6: 89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee F. (1999). Evidence for tense in a “tenseless” language. NELS 29: 229–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin J.-W. (2003). Selectional restrictions of tenses and temporal reference of Chinese bare sentences. Lingua 113: 271–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J.-W. (2006). Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics 23: 1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi, V. (2006). Tense parameters and serial verbs. In E. Aboh, J. Essegbey, & J. Ndayiragire (EDs.), Studies in the syntax of Kwa: A generative perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer. (submitted).

  • Matthewson, L. (2003). An underspecified tense in St’á t’imcets. In Proceedings of WECOL 2002. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics and California State University, Fresno.

  • Matthewson, L. (2004a). On the absence of telic accomplishments in St’á t’imcets. Proceedings of the workshop on structure and constituency in language of the Americas (Vol 10). UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Matthewson L. (2004b). On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics 70: 369–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson L. (2005a). On the absence of tense on determiners. Lingua 115(12): 1697-1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson L. (2005b). When I was small – I wan kwikws. Grammatical Analysis of St’át’imc Oral Narratives. Vancouver, BC, UBC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson L. (2006). The perfect II. Class notes, University of British Columbia.

  • Matthewson L., Rullmann H., Davis H. (2006). Modality in St’á t’imcets. In: Bischoff S.T., Butler L., Norquest P., Siddiqi D. (eds). MIT working papers on endangered and lesser known languages: Studies on Salishan. Cambridge, HA, HIT Press, pp. 93–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin L. (1998). Irrealis constructions in Mocho (Mayan). Anthropological linguistics 40:198–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithun M. (1999). The languages of native North America. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Musan R. (2002). The German perfect: its semantic composition and its interactions with temporal adverbials. Dordrecht, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens R. (1995). Tense and the logic of change. In: Egli U., Pause P., Schwarze C., von Stechow A., Wienold G. (eds). Lexical knowledge in the organization of language. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 147–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Narcisse, C. (1994). Bridge river fish camp. Lillooet, BC: Upper St’át’imc Language, Culture and Education Society (Translated into St’át’imcets by Rose Whitley).

  • Narcisse, C. (1997). John’s first hunt. Lillooet, BC: Upper St’át’imc Language, Culture and Education Society (Translated into St’át’imcets by Beverley Frank).

  • Nater, H. (1983). The bella coola language. Canadian Ethnology Service Paper No. 92. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.

  • Ogihara T. (1996). Tense, attitudes and scope. Dordrecht, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Pancheva, R., & von Stechow, A. (2004). On the present perfect puzzle. In Proceedings of NELS (Vol. 34). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.

  • Portner P. (1998). The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74: 760–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. Berkeley, CA, Univ. of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, E., & Wiltschko, M. (2005). Anchoring events to utterances without tense. Proceedings of WCCFL.

  • Rullmann, H., & You, A. (2006). General number and the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite bare nouns in Mandarin Chinese. In K. Turner & K. von Heusinger (Eds.) Where semantics meets pragmatics. Elsevier; CriSPI series.

  • Rullmann, H., Matthewson, L., & Davis, H. (2006). Distributive indefinite modals. Ms., University of British Columbia.

  • Sarkar A. (1998). The conflict between future tense and modality: The case of Will in English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 91–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaer, B. (2003). Toward the tenseless analysis of a tenseless language. In Proceedings of SULA (Vol 2, pp. 139–156). Amherst, MA: GLSA.

  • Smith C. (1978). The syntax and interpretation of temporal expressions in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 43–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Fernald, T., & Perkins, E. (2003). Temporal interpretation in Navajo. In Proceedings of SULA (Vol 2, pp. 175–192). Amherst, MA: GLSA.

  • Smith C., Erbaugh M. (2005). Temporal interpretation in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 43: 713–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stassen L. (1997). Intransitive predication. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, A. (1995). On the proper treatment of tense. In Proceedings of SALT, V.

  • Stowell, T. (1996). The phrase structure of tense. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Sybesma, R. (2003). The expression of tense in Chinese languages. IIAS Newsletter, July 2003.

  • Ultan R. (1978). The nature of future tenses. In: Greenberg J.H., et al. (eds). Word structure. Stanford, Stanford University Press, pp. 83–123

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eijk J. (1997). The Lillooet language: Phonology, morphology, syntax. Vancouver, BC, UBC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eijk, J., & Williams, L. (1981). Lillooet legends and stories. Mt. Currie, BC: Ts’zil Publishing House.

  • Vet C. (1993). Conditions d’emploi et interpretation des temps futurs du Francais. Verbum 16: 71–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal A., Klein H. (1998). Irrealis in Pilagá and Toba? Syntactic versus pragmatic coding. Anthropological Linguistics 40: 175–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltschko M. (2003). On the interpretability of tense on D and its consequences for case theory. Lingua 113: 659–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltschko, M. (2004). Expletive categorical features: A case study of number in Halkomelem. In Proceedings of NELS (Vol 35). Amherst, MA: GLSA.

  • Yavasm F. (1982). Future reference in Turkish. Linguistics 20: 411–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagona, K. (1990). Times as temporal argument structure. Ms., University of Washington.

  • Zepeda O. (1983). A papago grammar. Tuscon, AZ, University of Arizona Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Matthewson.

Additional information

I am very grateful to St’át’imcets consultants Gertrude Ned, Laura Thevarge, Rose Agnes Whitley and the late Beverley Frank. I am very grateful for helpful suggestions to Henry Davis, Irene Heim, Angelika Kratzer, Jo-wang Lin, Toshi Ogihara, Barbara Partee, Hotze Rullmann, Arnim von Stechow, Martina Wiltschko, Ede Zimmermann, two anonymous reviewers, and audiences at MIT, the University of Calgary, the University of British Columbia, the University of Washington, the 38th International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, and WECOL 2003. All remaining errors are my own. Fieldwork is supported by SSHRC grants #410-2002-1715 and #410-2005-0875.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthewson, L. Temporal semantics in a superficially tenseless language. Linguistics & Philosophy 29, 673–713 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9010-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9010-6

Keywords

Navigation