Abstract
A rationalist and realist model of scientific revolutions will be constructed by reference to two categories of criteria of theory-evaluation, denominated indicators of truth and of beauty. Whereas indicators of truth are formulateda priori and thus unite science in the pursuit of verisimilitude, aesthetic criteria are inductive constructs which lag behind the progression of theories in truthlikeness. Revolutions occur when the evaluative divergence between the two categories of criteria proves too wide to be recomposed or overlooked. This model of revolutions depends upon a substantial new treatment of aesthetic criteria in science with which much of the paper will therefore be occupied.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachelard, G.: 1934,The New Scientific Spirit, translated 1984 by A. Goldhammer, Beacon Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bunge, M.: 1963,The Myth of Simplicity: Problems of Scientific Philosophy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Cassidy, H. G.: 1962,The Sciences and the Arts: A New Alliance, Harper, New York.
Dirac, P. A. M.: 1963, ‘The Evolution of the Physicist's Picture of Nature’,Scientific American 208, no. 5, 45–53.
Duhem, P.: 1906,The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, translated 1954 by P. P. Wiener, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Einstein, A.: 1936, ‘Physics and Reality’, translated by J. Piccard,Journal of the Franklin Institute 221, 349–82 (original German version on pp. 313–47).
Einstein, A.: 1949, ‘Autobiographical Notes’, translated by P. A. Schilpp, in Schilpp (ed.),Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 3rd ed. (1970), pp. 1–94
Elkana, Y.: 1982, ‘The Myth of Simplicity’, in G. Holton and Elkana (eds.),Albert Einstein: Historical and Cultural Perspectives, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 205–51.
Fleck, L.: 1935,Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, translated 1979 by F. Bradley and T. J. Trenn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Galilei, G.: 1638,Two New Sciences, translated 1974 by S. Drake, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
Gingerich, O. J.: 1975, ‘“Crisis” versus Aesthetic in the Copernican Revolution’, in A. Beer and K. A. Strand (eds.),Copernicus Yesterday and Today (Vistas in Astronomy, Vol. 17), Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 85–93.
Greenaway, F.: 1966,John Dalton and the Atom, Heinemann, London.
Hanson, N. R.: 1961, ‘The Copernican Disturbance and the Keplerian Revolution’,Journal of the History of Ideas 22, 169–84.
Hardy, G. H.: 1940,A Mathematician's Apology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (reprinted 1967).
Hesse, M. B.: 1966,Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Hesse, M. B.: 1974,The Structure of Scientific Inference, Macmillan, London.
Holton, G.: 1973,Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Holton, G.: 1978,The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Holton, G.: 1986,The Advancement of Science, and Its Burdens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Huxley, T. H.: 1894, ‘Biogenesis and Abiogenesis’, inCollected Essays, nine volumes, Macmillan, London, Vol. 8, pp. 229–71.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1962,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2nd ed. (1970).
Kuhn, T. S.: 1977,The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lakatos, I.: 1971, ‘History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions’, in R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen (eds.),Philosophy of Science Association 1970 (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 91–136.
Lorentz, H. A.: 1920,The Einstein Theory of Relativity: A Concise Statement, 3rd ed., Brentano, New York.
Mach, E.: 1883,The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development, 6th ed., translated 1960 by T. J. McCormack, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.
Miller, A. I.: 1984,Imagery in Scientific Thought: Creating 20th-Century Physics, Birkhäuser, Boston, Massachusetts.
Newton-Smith, W. H.: 1978, ‘The Underdetermination of Theory by Data’,The Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 52, pp. 71–91.
Newton-Smith, W. H.: 1981,The Rationality of Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Neyman, J.: 1974, ‘Nicholas Copernicus (Mikolaj Kopernik): An Intellectual Revolutionary’, in Neyman (ed.),The Heritage of Copernicus: Theories ‘Pleasing to the Mind’, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1–22.
Poincaré, H.: 1905,The Value of Science, translated 1958 by G. B. Halstead, Dover, New York.
Rosen, E. (ed.): 1939,Three Copernican Treatises, 3rd ed. (1971), Octagon Books, New York.
Sober, E.: 1975,Simplicity, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Swinburne, R.: 1968,Space and Time, 2nd ed. (1981), Macmillan, London.
Thompson, S. P.: 1910,The Life of William Thompson, Baron Kelvin of Largs, two volumes, Macmillan, London.
Wechsler, J. (ed.): 1978,On Aesthetics in Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Wheeler, J. A.: 1983, ‘Law without Law’, in Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (eds.),Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 182–213.
Whitrow, G. J. (ed.): 1967,Einstein: The Man and His Achievement, British Broadcasting Corporation, London.
Wisan, W. L.: 1981, ‘Galileo and the Emergence of a New Scientific Style’, in J. Hintikka, D. Gruender and E. Agazzi (eds.),Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, and Galileo's Methodology (Proceedings of the 1978 Pisa Conference on the History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 311–39.
Zee, A.: 1986,Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics, Macmillan, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mcallister, J.W. Truth and beauty in scientific reason. Synthese 78, 25–51 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869680
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869680