Skip to main content
Log in

A Metalogical Theory of Natural Language Semantics

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Apt, K. and F. Turini (eds.): 1995, Meta-Logics and Logic Programming, MIT Press.

  • J. Barwise R. Cooper (1981) ArticleTitle‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’ Linguistics and Philosophy 4 159–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1983, Situations and Attitudes, MIT Press.

  • K. A. Bowen R. A. Kowalski (1982) ‘Amalgamating Language and Metalanguage in Logic Programming’ K. L. Clark S.-A. Tärnlund (Eds) Logic Programming Academic Press London 153–172

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Cresswell (1985) Structured Meanings MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Davidson (1967) ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’ N. Rescher (Eds) The Logic of Decision and Action University of Pittsburgh Press Pittsburgh, PA 81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, K.: 1995, Logic and Information, Cambridge University Press.

  • C. Fellbaum (1998) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Fox S. Lappin (2001) ‘A Framework for the Hyperintensional Semantics of Natural Language with Two Implementations’ P. d. Groote G. Morrill C. Retore (Eds) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Springer-Verlag Berlin and New York 175–192

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Gödel (1940) ‘The Consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis’ Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. R.: 1983, ‘An Improper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in Proc. of the 21st ACL. Cambridge, MA, pp. 57–63.

  • Hobbs, J. R.: 1985, ‘Ontological Promiscuity’, in Proc. of the 23rd ACL, Chicago, IL, pp. 61–69.

  • Horn, L. R.: 1969, ‘A Presuppositional Theory of Only and Even’, CLS 5.

  • R. Jackendoff (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar MIT Press Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Kamp (1981) ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’ J. Groenendijk (Eds) Formal Methods in the Study of Language Mathematical Centre Tracts 135 Amsterdam 277–322

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kaplan (1968) ArticleTitle‘Quantifying In’ Synthese 19 178–214

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Keenan J. Stavi (1986) ArticleTitle‘A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners’ Linguistics and Philosophy 9 253–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. A.: 1979, Logic for Problem Solving, North-Holland.

  • G. Lakoff (1972) ArticleTitle‘Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts’ Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 8 183–228

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Lappin (2000) ArticleTitle‘An Intensional Parametric Semantics for Vague Quantifiers’ Linguistics and Philosophy 23 599–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. L. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press.

  • S. Mac Lane (1998) Categories for the Working Mathematician Springer-Verlag New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord, M. C.: 1986, ‘Focalizers, the Scoping problem, and Semantic Interpretation Rules in Logic Grammars’, in M. van Caneghem and D. H. D. Warren (eds.), Logic Programming and its Applications, Ablex.

  • M. C. McCord (1987) ‘Natural Language Processing in Prolog’ A. Walker (Eds) Knowledge Systems and Prolog Addison-Wesley MA 291–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, Reidel, pp. 221–242.

  • Moore, R. C. and G. G. Hendrix: 1982, ‘Computational Models of Belief and the Semantics of Belief Sentences’, in S. Peters and E. Saarinen (eds.), Processes, Beliefs, and Questions, pp. 107–127, D. Reidel.

  • Pettorossi, A. (ed.): 1992, Meta-Programming in Logic, No. 649 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag.

  • W. V. Quine (1956) ArticleTitle‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’ The Journal of Philosophy 53 177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M.: 1985, ‘Association with Focus’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts.

  • M. Rooth (1992) ArticleTitle‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation’ Natural Language Semantics 1 75–116

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Rooth (1996) ‘Focus’ S. Lappin (Eds) The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory Blackwell Oxford 271–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoenfield, J. R.: 1967, Mathematical Logic, Addison-Wesley.

  • A. von Stechow (1991) ‘Current Issues in the Theory of Focus’ A. von Stechow D. Wunderlich (Eds) Semantik/Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research Walter de Gruyter Berlin 804–825

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Westerståhl (1985) ArticleTitle‘Logical Constants in Quantifier Languages’ Linguistics and Philosophy 8 387–413

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Zadeh (1965) ArticleTitle‘Fuzzy Sets’ Information and Control 8 338–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A.: 1977, ‘PRUF: A Language for the Representation of Meaning in Natural Languages’, in Proc. of the 5th IJCAI, Cambridge, MA, p. 918.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Mccord.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mccord, M., Bernth, A. A Metalogical Theory of Natural Language Semantics. Linguist Philos 28, 73–116 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-004-0807-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-004-0807-x

Keywords

Navigation