Skip to main content
Log in

Context, values and moral dilemmas: Comparing the choices of business and law school students

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much has been written about the ethics and values of today's business student, but this research has generally been characterized by a variety of methodological shortcomings — the use of convenience samples, a failure to establish the relevance of comparison groups employed, attempts to understand behavior in terms of unidimensional values preselected by the researcher, and the lack of well-designed longitudinal studies. The research reported here addresses many of these concerns by comparing the values and ethical decision making behavior of a large cohort of students entering an M. B. A. program to students entering law school. Using the Rokeach value survey and several ethical decision making vignettes, significant differences were found between the two groups which have important implications for both the business and legal professions and the education of their future leaders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beltramini, R. F., Peterson, R. A., and Kozmetsky, G.: 1984, ‘Concerns of College Students Regarding Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 3, pp. 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brathwaite, V. A. and Law, H. G.: 1985, ‘Structure of Human Values: Testing the Adequacy of the Rokeach Value Survey’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 pp. 250–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., Dukerich, J. M., and Doran, L. I.: 1991, ‘Resolving Ethical Dilemmas in Management: Experimental Investigations of Values, Accountability, and Choice’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21, pp. 380–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. J.: 1988, ‘Hostages to Fortune’, American Psychologist 43, pp. 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T.: 1975, Values in Education and Society (The Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and Gresham, L. G.: 1985, ‘A contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49, pp. 87–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. and Becker, H.: 1984, ‘Linking Management Behavior To Ethical Philosophy — An Empirical Investigation’, Academy of Management Journal 27, pp. 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, M. and Topol, M. T.: 1988, ‘Machiavellianism and the Department Store Executive’, Journal of Retailing 64, pp. 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E. and Clark, R. E.: 1986, ‘College Cheating: Immaturity, Lack of Commitment, and the Neutralizing Attitude.’, Research in Higher Education 25, pp. 342–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and Chonko, L. B.: 1984, ‘Marketing and Machiavellianism’, Journal of Marketing 48, pp. 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R.: 1988, Moral Mazes (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and Gautschi, F. H. III: 1988, ‘Will the Ethics of Business Change? A Survey of Future Executives’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, pp. 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, S. W., Ferrell, O. C. and Skinner, S. J.: 1990, ‘Ethical Behavior Among Marketing Researchers: An Assessment of Selected Demographic Characteristics’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, pp. 681–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. S. and Schaupp, D.: 1989, ‘Ethics In Education: A Comparative Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, pp. 943–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magner, D. K.: 1989, ‘Students Urge Graduate Business Schools to Emphasize Ethical Behavior and Require Courses In Standards’, The Chronicle of Higher Education 35(29): pp. A31-A32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravlin, E. C. and Meglino, B. M.: 1987, ‘Issues in Work Value Measurement’, in W. C. Frederick', Ed., Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy: Empirical Studies of Business Ethics and Values (JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, CT), pp. 153–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. and Thoma, S. J.: 1985, ‘Relation of Moral Judgment Development to Formal Education’, Developmental Psychologist 21, pp. 709–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M.: 1973, The Nature of Human Values (The Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. and Ball-Rokeach, S. J.: 1989, ‘Stability and Change in American Value Priorities 1968–1981’, American Psychologist 44, pp. 775–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, W.: 1987, ‘Ethics: What's Wrong?’, Time 129(8): pp. 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E.: 1986, ‘A Value Pluralism Model of Ideological Reasoning’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, pp. 819–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M.: 1989, Liberal Education and the Corporation (Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1991, ‘Developing A Typology of Managerial Value Orientations and Assessing Managers' Values’, International Journal of Value-Based Management, forthcoming.

  • Zinkhan, G. M., Bisei, M., and Saxton, M. J.: 1989, ‘MBAs' Changing Attitudes Toward Marketing Dilemmas: 1981–1987’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, pp. 963–974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Donald L. McCabe is Associate Professor of Management at the Graduate School of Management, Rutgers — The State University of New Jersey. His research focuses on decision making and interpretive processes under conditions of uncertainty.

Janet M. Dukerich is an Assistant Professor of Management at the University of Texas at Austin. Her research focuses on individual and group decision making and interpretation processes in organizations.

Jane E. Dutton is Associate Professor of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management at the University of Michigan. Her research interests center on organizational adaptation processes, and in particular, organization responses to value-laden issues.

The authors wish to thank Janice Beyer and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCabe, D.L., Dukerich, J.M. & Dutton, J.E. Context, values and moral dilemmas: Comparing the choices of business and law school students. J Bus Ethics 10, 951–960 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383799

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383799

Keywords

Navigation