Abstract
The first part of this paper discusses Quine’s views on underdetermination of theory by evidence, and the indeterminacy of translation, or meaning, in relation to certain physical theories. The underdetermination thesis says different theories can be supported by the same evidence, and the indeterminacy thesis says the same component of a theory that is underdetermined by evidence is also meaning indeterminate. A few examples of underdetermination and meaning indeterminacy are given in the text. In the second part of the paper, Quine’s scientific realism is discussed briefly, along with some of the difficulties encountered when considering the ‘truth’ of different empirically equivalent theories. It is concluded that the difference between underdetermination and indeterminacy, while significant, is not as great as Quine claims. It just means that after we have chosen a framework theory, from a number of empirically equivalent ones, we still have further choices along two different dimensions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cartan, E. (1923). Sur les Varietes a Affine et la Theorie de la Relativite Generalisee. Annales Scientifiques de l’Ecole Normale Superieure, 40, 325–412.
Cho, A. (2004). String theory gets real—sort of. Science, 306, 1460–1462.
Cramer, J. (1986). The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 58, 647–687.
Fine, A. (1988). The shaky game. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gibson, R. F. (1986). Translation, physics, and facts of the matter. In L. E. Hahn & P. A. Schilpp (Eds.), The philosophy of W.V. Quine (pp. 139–154). LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Halback, V. (1999). Disquotationalism and infinite conjunctions. Mind, 108, 1–22.
List, C. (1999). Craig’s theorem and the empirical underdetermination thesis reassessed. Disputatio, 7, 28–39.
Lyre, H. (2001). The principles of gauging. Philosophy of Science, 68, S371.
Lyre, H., & Eynck, T. O. (2003). Curve it, gauge it, or leave it? Practical underdetermination in gravitational theories. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 34(2), 277–303. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000514/.
Penrose, R. (1990). The emperor’s new mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1969). Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1970). On the reasons for indeterminacy of translation. The Journal of Philosophy, 67, 178–183.
Quine, W. V. (1975). On empirically equivalent systems of the world. Erkenntnis, 9, 313–328.
Quine, W. V. (1981). Theories and things. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1987). Indeterminacy of translation again. The Journal of Philosophy, 84, 5–10.
Quine, W. V. (1990). Three indeterminacies. In R. B. Barrett & R. F. Gibson (Eds.), Perspectives on Quine (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.
Quine, W. V. (1991). Two dogmas in retrospect. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 21, 265–274.
Quine, W. V. (1992). Pursuit of truth (revised edition). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1995). From stimulus to science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1996). Progress on two fronts. The Journal of Philosophy, XCIII(4), 159–163.
Quine, W. V. (1998). Reply to Roger F. Gibson Jr. In L. E. Hahn & P. A. Schilpp (Eds.), Philosophy of W.V. Quine (expanded edition) (pp. 684–685). Chicago, Illinois: Open Court.
Vollmer, S. (2000). Two kinds of observation. Philosophy of Science, 67, 355–365.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDiarmid, I. Underdetermination and Meaning Indeterminacy: What is the Difference?. Erkenn 69, 279–293 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-008-9122-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-008-9122-1