Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In Search of the Chemical Revolution: Interpretive Strategies in the History of Chemistry

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years the Chemical Revolution has become a renewed focus of interest among historians of science. This interest isshaped by interpretive strategies associated with the emergence anddevelopment of the discipline of the history of science. The disciplineoccupies a contested intellectual terrain formed in part by thedevelopment and cultural entanglements of science itself. Threestages in this development are analyzed in this paper. Theinterpretive strategies that characterized each stage are elucidatedand traced to the disciplinary interests that gave rise to them. Whilepositivists and whigs appropriated the history of science to thejustificatory and celebratory needs of science itself, postpositivistslinked it to philosophical models of rationality, and sociologists ofknowledge sought its sociological reconstruction. Since none of thesestrategies do justice to the complexity of historical events, a modelof the Chemical Revolution is outlined which upholds the autonomyand specificity of history and the methods used to study it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • W. R. Albury. The Logic of Condillac and the Structure of French Chemical and Biological Theory, 1781-1801. Ph.D. Thesis, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Althusser. Reading Capital, transl. by B. Brewster. London: New Left Books, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Althusser. For Marx, transl. by B. Brewster. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Althusser. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, transl. by B. Brewster. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Anderson. Between the Library and the Laboratory: The Language of Chemistry in Eighteenth-Century France, 1760-1820.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Barnes. Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Barnes. T.S. Kuhn and the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bensaude-Vincent. Hélène Metzger's La Chimie: A Popular Treatise. History of Science 25: 71–84, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bensaude-Vincent. The Balance: Between Chemistry and Politics. The Eigtheenth Century: Theory and I. Interpretation 33: 217–238, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bensaude-Vincent and I. Stengers.A History of Chemistry, transl by D. van Dam. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Beretta. The Enlightenment of Matter: The Definition of Chemistry from Agricola to Lavoisier. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Bloor. Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Bloor. Durkheim and Mauus Revisited: Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 13: 267–287, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R.R. Christie. The Development of the Historiography of Science. In: R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie and M.S. Hodge (Eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science, pp. 4–22. London: Rutledge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Christie and J.Y. Golinski. The Spreading of the Word: New Directions in the Historiography of Chemistry, 1600-1800. History of Science 20, 235–266, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Cilliers. Complexity and Postmodernism. Understanding Complex Systems. London: Routledge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • I.B. Cohen. Franklin and Newton: An Inquiry into Speculative Newtonian Science and Franklin's Work as an Example Thereof. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • I.B. Cohen. The Many Faces of the History of Science: A Font of Examples for Philosophers, a Scientific Type of History, an Archaeology of Discovery, a Branch of Sociology, a Variant of Intellectual or Social History - or What?. In: C.F. Dessell (Ed.), The Future of History. Essays in the Vanderbilt Centennial Symposium, pp. 3–42. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.G. Collingwood. An Autobiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.W. Constant II. Communities and Hierarchies: Structure in the Practice of Science and Technology. In: R. Laudan (Ed.), The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant?, pp. 27–43. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Crosland, Lavoisier's Theory of Acidity. Isis 64: 306–325, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Dews. Althusser, Structuralism, and the French Epistemological Tradition. In: G. Eliot (Ed.), Althusser: A Critical Reader, pp. 104–141. London: Blackwell, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Donovan. Lavoisier and the Origins of Modern Chemistry. In: A. Donovan (Ed.), The Chemical Revolution. A Reinterpretation. Osiris, 2nd series, volume 4, pp. 214–231. Philadelphia, PA: History of Science Society, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Donovan. Lavoisier as Chemist and Experimental Physicist: A Reply to Perrin. Isis 81: 270–272, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Fichman. French Stahlism and Chemical Studies of Air, 1750-1770.Ambix 18: 94–123, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Forbes. Scientific Whiggism: Adam Smith and John Miller. Cambridge Journal 7: 643–670, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Foucault. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, transl by A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Frangsmyr. Science or History: George Sarton and the Positivist Tradition in the History of Science. Lychnos 74: 104–144, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.V. Golinski. Science in the Enlightenment. History of Science 24: 411–424, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.V. Golinski. Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Gordy. Reading Althusser: Time and the Social Whole. History and Theory 22: 1–21, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Gough. The Origins of Lavoisier's Theory of the Gaseous State. In: H. Woolf (Ed.), The Analytic Spirit. Essays on the History of Science in Honor of Henry Guerlac, pp. 15–39. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Gough. Lavoisier and the Fulfillment of the Stahlian Revolution. In: A Donovan (Ed.), The Chemical Revolution. Essays in Reinterpretation, Osiris, 2nd series, Volume 4, pp. 15–33. Philadelphia, PA: History of Science Society, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Guerlac. Lavoisier - the Crucial Year: The Background and Origin of His First Experiments on Combustion in 1772. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Guerlac. Some Historical Assumptions of the History of Science. In: A.C. Crombie (Ed.), Scientific Change, pp. 797–812. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1963a.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Guerlac. Discussion. In: A.C. Crombie (Ed.), Scientific Change, pp. 875–876. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1963b.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Habermas. Knowledge and Human Interest, transl. by J.J. Shapiro. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.R. Hall. Merton Revisited: Or Science and Society in the Seventeenth Century. History of Science 2: 1–16, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Hartfoort. The Missing Synthesis in the Historiography of Science. History of Science 24: 207–216, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Heimann and J.E. McGuire. Newtonian Forces and Lockean Powers: Concepts of Matter in Eighteenth-Century Thought. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3: 233–306, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • F.L. Holmes. Lavoisier and the Chemistry of Life. An Explanation of Scientific Creativity. Madison,WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • F.L. Holmes. Eighteenth-Century Chemistry as an Investigative Enterprise. Office for History of Science and Technology, Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Knight. Ideas in Chemistry. A History of the Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Koyré. Commentary. In: A.C. Crombie (Ed.), Scientific Change, pp. 797–812. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Koyré. Metaphysics and Measurement. Essays in Scientific Revolution. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Kragh. An Introduction to the Historiography of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.S. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., enlarged. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Lakatos. History of Science and its Rational Reconstruction. In: C. Howson (Ed.), Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. The Critical Background to Modern Science, 1800-1905, pp. 7–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Latour. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Latour and S. Woolgar. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage Publications, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Laudan. Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. LeGrand. Lavisier's Oxygen Theory of Acidity. Annals of Science 24: 1–18, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. McEvoy. The Enlightenment and the Chemical Revolution. In: R.S. Woolhouse (Ed.), Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Essays in Honor of Gerd Buchdahl, pp. 307–325. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988a.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. McEvoy. Continuity and Discontinuity in The Chemical Revolution. In: A Donovan (Ed.), The Chemical Revolution. Essays in Reinterpretation, Osiris, 2nd series, Volume 4, pp. 195–213. Philadelphia, PA: History of Science Society, 1988b.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. McEvoy. The Chemical Revolution in Context. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 33: 198–216, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. McEvoy. Priestley Responds to Lavoisier's Nomenclature: Language, Liberty, and Chemistry in the English Enlightenment. In: B. Bensaude-Vincent and F. Abbri (Eds.), Lavoisier in European Context. Negotiating a New Language for Chemistry, pp. 123–142. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. McEvoy. Positivism, Whiggism, and the Chemical Revolution: A Study in the Historiography of Chemistry. History of Science 35: 1–33, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. McMullin. The Rational and the Social in the History of Science. In: J.R. Brown (Ed.), Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn, pp. 127–163. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Melhado. On the Historiography of Science: A Reply to Perrin. Isis 81: 273–276, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Morris. Lavoisier and the Caloric Theory. British Journal of the History of Science 6: 1–38, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Motzkin. The Catholic Response to Secularization and the Rise of the History of Science as a Discipline. Science in Context 3: 203–222, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Musgrave. Why Did Oxygen Supplant Phlogiston? Research Programmes in the Chemical Revolution. In: Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. The Critical Background to Modern Science, 1800-1905, pp. 181–209. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.E. Perrin. Research Traditions, Lavoisier, and the Chemical Revolution. In: A. Donovan (Ed.), The Chemical Revolution. A Reinterpretation, Osiris, 2nd series, Volume 4, pp. 53–81. Philadelphia, PA: History of Science Society, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.E. Perrin. Chemistry as a Peer of Physics: A Response to Donovan and Melhado on Lavoisier. Isis 81: 259–270, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Porter. Preface. In: R. Porter and M. Teich (Eds.), The Enlightenment in National Context, pp. v–xii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.R. Popper. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 2nd ed., revised. London: Hutchinson, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.R. Popper. Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Prigogine and I. Stengers. Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. Toronto: Bantam Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Roberts. A Word and the World: The Significance of Naming the Calorimeter. Isis 82: 199–222, 1997a.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Roberts. Setting the Table: The Disciplinary Development of Eighteenth-Century Chemistry as Read through the Changing Structure of its Tables. In: P. Dear (Ed.), The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument, pp. 99–132. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991b.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sargent. The Diffident Naturalist. Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Schaffer. Natural Philosophy. In: G.S. Rousseau and R. Porter (Eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science, pp. 55–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Schaffer. Making Certain. Social Studies of Science 14: 137–152, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Schaffer. Measuring Virtue: Eudiometry, Enlightenment, and Pneumatic Medicine. In: A. Cunningham and R. French (Eds.), The Medical Enlightenment, pp. 218–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Schofield. Joseph Priestley: Natural Philosopher. Ambix 14: 1–15, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shapin. Social Uses of Science. In: G.S. Rousseau and R. Porter (Eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science, pp. 93–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shapin. History of Science and its Sociological Reconstructions. History of Science 20: 157–211, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shapin. Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology. Social Studies of Science 14: 481–520, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shapin. Following Scientists Around: Essay Review of Bruno Latour, 'science in Action'. Social Studies of Science 19: 533–550, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shapin. The Scientific Revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shapin and S. Schaffer. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Siegfried. The Chemical Revolution in the History of Chemistry. In: A. Donovan (Ed.), The Chemical Revolution. Essays in Reinterpretation, Osiris, 2nd series, Volume 4, pp. 34–50. Philadelphia, PA: History of Science Society, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Siegfried and B.J.T. Dobbs. Composition, a Neglected Aspect of the Chemical Revolution. Annals of Science 24: 273–293, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Simon. The Chemical Revolution and Pharmacy. Ambix 44: 1–13, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Teich. Afterword. In: R. Porter and M. Teich (Eds.), The Enlightenment in National Context, pp. 215–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Thackray.Atoms and Powers: An Essay on Newtonian Matter Theory and the Development of Chemistry. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Thackray. Science: Has Its Present Past a Future?. In: R.H. Stuewer (Ed.), Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, pp. 112–133. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.E. Toulmin. Crucial Experiments: Priestley and Lavoisier. Journal of the History of Ideas 18: 205–222, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.T. Toulmin. Human Understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Verbruggen. How to Explain Priestley's Defense of Phlogiston. Janus 54: 47–69, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.S. Westman and D.C. Lindberg. Introduction. In: R.S. Westman and D.C. Lindley (Eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, pp. xvii–xxvii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, U.S.A.

    John G. McEvoy

Authors
  1. John G. McEvoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McEvoy, J.G. In Search of the Chemical Revolution: Interpretive Strategies in the History of Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 2, 47–73 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009968823008

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009968823008

Keywords

Search

Navigation