Skip to main content

De Re and De Se Belief

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 39))

Abstract

The question of what makes a belief about an object has received concurring answers from two important philosophers. David Lewis [1979] and Roderick Chisholm [1981] have presented several related analyses of de re belief, arguing that de se belief (belief about the self) is the fundamental notion in terms of which de re belief can and must be analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Boër, Steven and Lycan, William G. [1980], ‘Who, me?,’ Philosophical Review 89 427–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick [1981], The First Person (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, B. L. [1985], ‘Belief de re and de se,’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63 389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, Michael [1981], Designation (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David [1979], ‘Attitudes de dieto and de se,’ Philosophical Review 87 513–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markie, Peter J. [1984], ‘DE DICTO and DE SE,’ Philosophical Studies 45 231 – 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Thomas [1984a], ‘Actions and de re beliefs,’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 631 – 635.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Thomas [1984b], ‘Critical review of Michael Devitt’s Designation,’ Nous 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Thomas [1984c], ‘In defense of the underprivileged,’ delivered at the meetings of the Western Division of the American Philosophical Association, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Thomas [1986], ‘His burning pants,’ Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 393 – 400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tye, Michael [1982], ‘A causal analysis of seeing,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 311 – 325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McKay, T.J. (1988). De Re and De Se Belief. In: Austin, D.F. (eds) Philosophical Analysis. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2909-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2909-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3150-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2909-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics