Abstract
In 1987, Chrysler bought American Motors which included a plant in Kenosha, Wisconsin, a city of 72 000. Employing 6 500 workers, most of whom were members of the United Auto Workers (UAW), Chrysler became the city's largest employer. For decades, the UAW had a strong influence on city politics. However, in the 1980s young professionals in Kenosha began challenging this status quo.
Chrysler shocked the citizens of Kenosha when their executives announced the closing of their plant within a year. Wisconsin government officials and the UAW believed that Chrysler promised to stay for up to five years; they considered Chrysler's move to be a breach of contract. Chrysler responded that it was their "intention" -- not a contractual agreement -- to stay in Kenosha. From an ethical perspective, just cause, due process and mitigation of harmful effects should be applied in the discussion of a plant closing.
At first, Chrysler offered minimal compensation. Strong negative reaction, especially in the media, seemed to have a powerful effect on Chrysler's decision to close the plant but to offer generous social and financial assistance. Chrysler thus became socially responsive in providing the city with new and greater opportunities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amoco Corporation: 1971, unpublished material.
Aquinas, Thomas: 1947, Summa Theologica (Benzinger Brothers, Inc., New York), Vol. I, pp. 639–642; Vol. II, pp. 1431–1432.
Carroll, Archie B.: 1993, Business and Society (South-Western Publishing, Cininnati), pp. 42–45.
Davis, Keith and Robert Blomstrom: 1975, Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp. 39, 31.
Dudley, Kathryn: 1994, The End of the Line: Lost Jobs in Postindustrial America (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 8, 15, 27, 24–25, 74.
Foley, Thomas J.: 1989, ‘Plant Closings and Human Dilemmas’, Paper presented at the Loyola University Chicago Weekend Seminar on Socio-Ethical Values, February 24–25.
Frederick, William C.: 1978, ‘From CSR1, to CSR2: The Maturing of Business-and-Society Thought’ (Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh), Working Paper No. 279, p. 6, quoted in Archie B. Carroll, Business & Society (South-Western Publishing, Cincinnati), pp. 40–41.
Garrett, Thomas and Bernard Konoski: 1987, Business Ethics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.), pp. 86–87.
Glass, Stephen: 1994, ‘Yes We Kenosha’, Policy Review (Fall), 80.
Johnston, Herbert: 1961, Business Ethics (Pitman Publishing Corporation, New York), pp. 109–110.
Jones, Sandra: 1994, ‘As Good As Gold’, The Chicago Tribune, May 9.
Lowe, Frederick H.: 1991, ‘The Case of Stewart Warner’, Chicago Sun-Times, June 21.
Mateja, Jim and Robert Enstad: 1988, ‘5,500 Jobs to Die with Car Plant’, The Chicago Tribune, January 28.
Mateja, Jim and Stephen Franklin: 1995, The Chicago Tribune, January 6.
Miller, Brian: 1988, ‘Chicago Tonight’, WTTW–TV, February 18.
Moberg, David: 1988, ‘The Human Cost of Restructuring’, The Chicago Tribune, March 2.
Sethi, S. Prakash: 1975, ‘Dimensions of Corporate Social Preformance: An Analytical Framework’, California Management Review (Spring), 58–64.
Smith, Len, Richard Mann and Barry Roberts: 1993, Business Law and the Regulation of Business (West Publishing Company, Minneapolis), pp. 181–182.
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (New Collegiate Edition) (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston) “Change,” “crisis,” “irresponsible.”
White, Joseph B.: 1988, ‘Chrysler to Donate Wisconsin Profits to Fund for Workers from Closed Plant’, The Wall Street Journal, February 17.
Witcher, Gregory: 1988, ‘Chrysler to Pay $250 Million to Settle Dispute Over Wisconsin Plant Closing’, The Wall Street Journal, September 26.
Wysocky, Ken and Mike Christopoulos: 1988, ‘Kenosha Union Sues to Stop Chrysler Move’, Milwaukee Journal', February 27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McMahon, T.F. From Social Irresponsibility to Social Responsiveness: The Chrysler/Kenosha Plant Closing. Journal of Business Ethics 20, 101–111 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005753201925
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005753201925