Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evil and the many universes response

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I formulate and defend a version of the many universes (or multiverse) reply to the atheistic argument from evil. Specifically, I argue that (i) if we know that any argument from evil (be it a logical or evidential argument) is sound, then we know that God would be (or at least probably would be) unjustified in actualizing our universe. I then argue that (ii) there might be a multiverse and (iii) if so, then we do not know that God would be (or at least probably would be) unjustified in actualizing our universe. It follows that we cannot know that the atheistic argument from evil is sound, in which case we cannot be certain that the argument succeeds, and so it is rational to refuse to reject theism because of such arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams R. M. (1972) Must God create the best?. Philosophical Review 81(3): 317–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins R. (1999) A scientific argument for the existence of God. In: Michael J. M. (ed.) Reason for the hope within. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins R. (2003) The evidence of fine-tuning. In: Manson N. (ed.) God and design: The teleological argument and modern science. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper P. (1989) Pain and pleasure: An evidential problem for theists. Noûs 23: 331–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, T. (2008). Science’s alternative to an intelligent creator: The multiverse theory. Discover Magazine. http://discovermagazine.com/2008/dec/10-sciences-alternative-to-an-intelligent-creator. Accessed 14 Nov 2010

  • Forrest P. (1981) The problem of evil: Two neglected defenses. Sophia 20: 49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest P. (1996) A speculative understanding of evil. God without the supernatural. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick J. (1966) Evil and the God of love. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson H. (2006) Hyperspace and theism, the metaphysics of hyperspace. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (2009). Naturalism. The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/naturali/. Accessed 14 Nov 2010

  • Kraay K. (2010) Theism, possible worlds and the multiverse. Philosophical Studies. 147(3): 355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz G. (1710/1951) Theodicy. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie J. L. (1955) Evil and omnipotence. Mind 64: 200–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey H. J. (1960) God and evil. Philosophical Quarterly 10: 97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHarry J. D. (1978) A theodicy. Analysis 38: 132–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A. (1974) The nature of necessary. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A. (1977) God, freedom, and evil. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratzsch, D. (2008). Teleological arguments for God’s existence. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/teleological-arguments/. Accessed 7 Oct 2010.

  • Rowe W. L. (1978) Philosophy of religion: An introduction. Dickenson Publishing Company, Encino, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe W. L. (1979) The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism. American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 335–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe W. L. (1988) Evil and theodicy. Philosophical Topics 16: 119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe W. L. (1996) The evidential argument from evil: A second look. In: Howard-Snyder D. (ed.) The evidential argument from evil. University of Indiana Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger G. (1964) The problem of evil and the problem of suffering. American Philosophical Quarterly 1: 244–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger G. (1977) Religion and scientific method. D. Reidel, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger G. (1988) New perspectives on old-time religion. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegmark M. (2003) Parallel universes. In: Barrow J. D., Davies P. C. W., Harper C. L. (eds) Science and ultimate reality: From quantum to cosmos, honoring John Wheeler’s 90th birthday. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, M. (2008). The problem of evil. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/evil/. Accessed 7 Oct 2010.

  • Trakakis, N. (2006). The evidential problem of evil. In The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/evil-evi.htm. Accessed 7 Oct 2010.

  • Turner D. (2003) The many-universes solution to the problem of evil. In: Gale R., Pruss A. (eds) The existence of God. International Research Library of Philosophy, Ashgate, Aldershof

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidman, L. (2008). Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/qm-manyworlds/. Accessed 7 Oct 2010.

  • Wilson J. (2005) Supervenience-based formulations of physicalism. Nous 39(3): 426–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wykstra S. J. (1984) The Humean obstacle to evidential arguments from suffering: On avoiding the evils of ‘appearance’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16: 73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA

    Jason Megill

Authors
  1. Jason Megill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Megill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Megill, J. Evil and the many universes response. Int J Philos Relig 70, 127–138 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9280-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9280-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation