Abstract
Here I reexamine Duhem's question of the continuity between medieval dynamics and early modern conservation theories. I concentrate on the heavens. For Aristotle, the motions of the heavens are eternally constant (and thus mathematizable) because an eternally constant divine Reason is their mover. Duhem thought that impetus and conservation theories, by extending sublunar mechanics to the heavens, made a divine renewer of motion redundant. By contrast, I show how Descartes derives his law of conservation by extending Aristotelian celestial dynamics to the earth. Descartes argues that motion is intrinsically linear, not circular. But he agrees that motion is mathematically intelligible only where divine Reason moves bodies in a constant and eternal motion. Descartes strips bodies of active powers, leaving God as the only natural mover; thus both celestial and sublunar motions are constant, and uniformly mathematizable. The law of conservation of the total quantity of motion is an attempt to harmonize the constancy derived a priori with the phenomenal inconstancy of sublunar motions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, R. E. (ed.): 1965, Studies in Plato's Metaphysics, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Buridan, J.: 1942, Quaestiones Super Libris Quattuor De Caelo et Mundo, Mediaeval Academy of America, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Descartes, R.: 1964: Oeuvres de Descartes, Adam et Tannery (ed.), Nouvelle Présentation, Vrin, Paris.
Duhem, P.: 1913, Etudes sur Léonard de Vinci, troisième série, Les Précurseurs Parisiens de Galilée, Hermann, Paris.
Hackforth, R.: 1945, Plato's Examination of Pleasure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Ibn Sina: 1960, Al-Shifa', Al-Ilahiyyat (2), Government Printing Organization, Cairo.
Maier, A.: 1982, On the Threshold of Exact Science, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Menn, S.: 1989. Descartes and Augustine, unpublished University of Chicago dissertation.
Proclus: 1968, Théologie Platonicienne, Livre I, Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
Simplicius: In Aristotelis De Caelo Commentaria, in 1882, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Reimer, Berlin, Vol. 7.
Simplicius: In Aristotelis Physicorum Libros Quattuor Posteriores Commentaria, in 1882, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. 10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank Daniel Garber, Alison Laywine, and Ian Mueller for their comments. Since I have not seen a text of Professor Westman's remarks, either before or after he delivered them, I cannot respond to his criticisms.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Menn, S. Descartes and some predecessors on the divine conservation of motion. Synthese 83, 215–238 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413758
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413758