Abstract
Originating in the Sophistic pedagogy of Protagoras and reflecting the sceptical practice of the New Academy, Quintilian's rhetorical pedagogy places a special emphasis on the juxtaposition of multiple, competing claims. This inherently dialogical approach to argumentation is referred to here as controversia and is on full display in Quintilian's own argumentative practice. More important to this paper, however, is the role of controversia as an organizing principle for Quintilian's rhetorical curriculum. In particular, Quintilian introduces the protocols of controversia through a series of progressively more complex exercises in imitation, role-playing, and declamation (now referred to as situational games). All of these exercises are open for adaptation by contemporary teachers who would promote a dialogical approach to argument, i.e. argument with its methods of inquiry, invention, and judgment based on direct interaction with opposing parties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aristotle: 1984, The Complete Works, 2 volumes, ed. Jonathan Barnes, Bollingen Series, Princeton.
Billig, M.: 1987, Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bonner, S. F.: 1969, Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool.
Bonner, S. F.: 1977, Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny, Methuen and Company, London.
Brunschwig, J.: 1996, 'Aritstotle's Rhetoric as a 'Counterpart' to Dialectic', in A. K. Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle's Rhetoric, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 34-55.
Buckley, M. J.: 1971, Motion and Motion's God: Thematic Variations in Aristotle, Cicero, Newton, and Hegel, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Carter, M.: 1988, 'Stasis and Kairos: Principles of Social Construction in Classical Rhetoric', Rhetoric Review 7(1), 97-112.
Cicero: 1913, de Officiis, trans. Walter Miller, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cicero: 1929, de Oratore, trans. H. Rackham, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cicero: 1933, Academica, trans. H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cicero: 1939, Orator, trans. H.M. Hubbell, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Clark, D. L.: 1957, Rhetoric in Greco-Roman Education, Columbia University Press, Morningside Heights, NY.
Colson, F. H.: 1924, 'Introduction' to M. Fabii Quintilianii: Institutionis Oratoriae, Liber I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. i-xx.
Comprone, J.: 1985, 'Expressive Writing: Exercises in a New Progymnasmata', Journal of Technical Writing 4(1), 31-53.
Copi, I.: 1986, Introduction to Logic, 7th edition, Macmillan, New York.
De Romilly, J.: 1992, The Great Sophists of Periclean Athens, Trans. Janet Lloyd, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Farrar, C.: 1988, The Origins of Democratic Thinking: The Invention of Politics in Classical Athens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Fulkerson, R.: 1988, 'Technical Logic, Comp-Logic, and the Teaching of Writing', College Composition and Communication 39(4), 436-452.
Glucker, J.: 1995, 'Probabile, Veri Simile, and Related Terms', in J. G. F. Powell (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 115-144.
Görler, W.: 1995, 'Silencing the Troublemaker: De Legibus 1.39 and the Continuity of Cicero's Scepticism', in J. G. F. Powell (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 85-114.
Greer, W. J.: 1925, 'Quintilian and the Declamation', The Classical Weekly 19(4), 27-31.
Grube, G. M. A.: 1965, The Greek and Roman Critics, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Hagaman, L.: 1986, 'The Modern Use of the Progymnasmata in Teaching Rhetorical Invention', Rhetoric Review 5(1), 22-29.
Hankinson, R. J.: 1995, The Sceptics, Routledge, London.
Hock, R. and E. N. O'Neill: 1986, The Chreia in Ancient Rhetoric, Scholars Press, Athens, Georgia.
Kennedy, G.: 1969, Quintilian, Twayne Publishers, New York.
Kerferd, G. B.: 1981, The Sophistic Movement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lanham, R.: 1993, The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Leff, M.: 1990, 'Decorum and Rhetorical Interpretation: The Latin Humanistic Tradition and Contemporary Critical Theory', Vichiana 3, 109-126.
Long, A. A.: 1974, Hellenistic Philosophy, Duckworth, London.
Mailloux, S.: 1995, 'Introduction: Sophistry and Rhetorical Pragmatism', in S. Mailloux (ed.), Rhetoric, Sophistry, Pragmatism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-32.
Marrou, H. I., 1956, The History of Education in Antiquity, trans. George Lamb, Sheed and Ward, New York.
Mendelson, M.: 1989, 'The Rhetorical Case: Its Roman Precedent and the Contemporary Debate', The Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 19(3), 203-226.
Mendelson, M.: 1997, 'Everything Must Be Argued: Rhetorical Theory and Pedagogical Practice in Cicero's de Oratore', The Journal of Education 179(1), 15-47.
Mendelson, M.: 1998, 'The Antilogical Alternative', in James F. Klumpp (ed.), Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques, University of Utah Press, NCA/AFA, pp. 30-34.
Mendelson, M. and N. Lindeman: 1999, 'The Absence of Dialogue: An Assessment of Argument Theory in Argument Composition Texts', in T. A. Hollihan (ed.), Argument at Century's End: Reflecting on the Past and Envisioning the Future, University of Utah Press, NCA/AFA, pp. 316-324.
Montaigne, M.: 1948, The Complete Essays, trans. D. Frame, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Murphy, J. J.: 1987, 'Introduction', Quintilian on the Art of Speaking and Writing, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. ix-xlxiii.
Murphy, J. J.: 1990, 'Roman Writing Instruction as Described by Quintilian', A Short History of Writing Instruction, Hermagoras Press, Davis, CA, pp. 19-76.
Nehamas, A.: 1990, 'Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic: Plato's Demarcation of Philosophy from Sophistry', History of Philosophy Quarterly 7(1), 3-16.
Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise in Argumentation, trans. J. Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Philostratus: 1965, Lives of the Sophists, trans. W.C. Wright, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Powell, J. G. F.: 'Introduction: Cicero's Philosophical Works and Their Background', Cicero the Philosopher, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 1-36.
'Protagoras': 1963, in E. Hamilton and H. Cairns (eds.), The Complete Dialogues of Plato, Bollingen, New York, pp. 308-351.
Quintilian: 1920, Institutio Oratoria, trans. H. E. Bulter, 4 volumes, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Quintilian: 1987, Major Declamations, trans. L. W. Sussman, Verlag/Peter Lang, Frankfurt.
Russell, D. A.: 1981, Criticism in Antiquity, Duckworth, London.
Russell, D. A.: 1983, Greek Declamation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Seneca the Elder.: 1974, Controversiae and Suasoriae, trans. M. Winterbottom, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sextus Empiricus: 1994, Outline of Scepticism, trans. J. Annas and J. Barnes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sloane, T. O.: 1985, Donne, Milton, and the End of Humanist Rhetoric, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Sloane, T. O.: 1997, On the Contrary: The Protocol of Traditional Rhetoric, Catholic University of America Press, Washington D.C.
Solmsen, F.: 1975, Intellectual Experiments of the Greek Enlightenment, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Sprague, R. K.: 1972, The Older Sophists: A Translation of Diels-Kranz, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.
Starr, C. G.: 1965, Civilization and the Caesars: The Intellectual Revolution of the Roman Empire, Norton and Company, New York.
Sullivan, D.: 1989, 'Attitudes toward Imitation: Classical Culture and the Modern Temper', Rhetoric Review 8(1), 5-21.
Tannen, D.: 1998, The Argument Culture: Moving from Debate to Dialogue, Random House, New York.
Untersteiner, M.: 1954, The Sophists, trans. Kathleen Freeman, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mendelson, M. Quintilian and the Pedagogy of Argument. Argumentation 15, 277–294 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011165327867
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011165327867