Abstract
If respect for the dignity ofnon-human creatures is to be an element of publicpolicy it needs, as a first step, to be assimilatedinto the common morality. It is suggested that suchrespect may be based on several philosophicalpremises. Limiting the discussion to sentient animals,the paper reviews three of these: the concept ofanimal telos; the application of Rawlsiancontractarianism to the case of non-human animals asmoral patients; and human attitudes to animals in thelight of virtue theory. Consideration is then given tothe extent to which, by accommodating respect for thedignity of animals within the common morality, theseprinciples might find more substantive expression inpublic policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Auden, W. H., Chorus from “The Dog Beneath the Skin,” in K. Allott (ed.), The Penguin Book of Contemporary Verse (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1962).
Beauchamp, T. L and J. F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics (4th edition) (Oxford University Press, New York, 1994).
Budianski, S., “The Covenant of the Wild.” (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1992).
Cooper, D. E., “Intervention, humility and animal integrity,” in A. Holland and A. Johnson (eds.), Animal Biotechnology and Ethics (Chapman and Hall, London, 1998), pp. 145-155.
Cooper, D. E., “Who' afraid of the big bad GM genie?” The Sunday Times 21st May, 2000, p. 9.
Eurobarometer 46.1, The Europeans and modern biotechnology (Brussels: European Commission Directorate XII, 1997).
Flyvberg, B., “Aristotle, Foucault and progressive Phronesis: outline of applied ethics for sustainable development,” in E. R. Winkler and J. R. Coombes (eds.), Applied Ethics (Blackwell, Oxford, 1993), pp. 11-27.
Harris, J., Clones, Genes and Immortality (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).
Holland, A., “Artificial lives: philosophical dimensions of farm animal biotechnology,” in T. B. Mepham, G. A. Tucker, and J. Wiseman (eds.), Issues in Agricultural Bioethics (University of Nottingham Press, Nottingham, 1995), pp. 293-305.
Kant, I., Lectures on Ethics (translated from the German by Louis Infield) (Methuen, London, 1930).
Larrére, C. and R. Larrére, “Animal rearing as a contract?” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (12) (2000), 51-58.
MAFF, Report of the Committee to consider the ethical implications of emerging technologies in the breeding of farm animals (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, 1995).
McIntyre, A., After Virtue 2nd edition (Duckworth, London, 1985).
Mepham, T. B., “Ethical analysis of food biotechnologies: an evaluative framework,” in T. B. Mepham (ed.), Food Ethics (Routledge, London, 1996), pp. 101-119.
Mepham, T. B., “A framework for the ethical evaluation of novel foods: the Ethical Matrix,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (12) (2000a), 165-176.
Mepham, T. B., “The role of food ethics in food policy',” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society (in press, 2000b).
Mepham, T. B., R. D. Combes, M. Balls, O. Barbieri, H. J. Blokhuis, P. Costa, R. E. Crilly, T. de Cock Buning, V. C. Delpire, M. J. O'Hare, L. M. Houdebine, C. F. van Kreijl, M. van der Meer, C. A. Reinhardt, E.Wolf, and A. M. van Zeller, “The use of transgenic animals in the European Union: report and recommendations of ECVAMworkshop,” 28, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (26) (1998), 21-43.
Mepham, T. B. and R. E. Crilly, “Bioethical issues in the generation and use of transgenic farm animals,” Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (27) (1999), 1-9.
Moore, C. J. and T. B. Mepham, “Transgenesis and animal welfare,” Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (23) (1995), 380-397.
Rawls, J., “Outline of a decision procedure for ethics,” The Philosophical Review (60) (1951), 177-197.
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1972).
Regan, T., “Exploring the idea of animal rights,” in D. Paterson and R. D. Ryder (eds.), Animal Rights: a Symposium (Centaur Press, London, 1979), 73-86.
Rodd, R., Biology, Ethics and Animals (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990).
Rollin, B., The Unheeded Cry: animal consciousness, animal pain and science (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989).
Rutgers, B. and R. Heeger, “Inherent worth and respect for animal integrity,” in M. Dol, M. Fentener van Vlissen, S. Kasanmoentalib, T. Visser, and H. Zwart (eds.), Recognizing the Intrinsic Value of Animals: Beyond Animal Welfare (Van Gorcum, Assen, 1999), pp. 41-51.
Seidel, G. E, Jr., “The future of trangenic farm animals,” in J. D. Murray, G. B. Anderson, A. M. Oberbauer, and M. M. McGloughlin (eds.), Transgenic Animals in Agriculture (CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 1999), pp. 269-282.
Thomas K., Man and The Natural World: changing attitudes in England 1500-1800 (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1984).
Van der Tuuk, E., “Intrinsic value and the struggle against anthropocentrism,” in M. Dol, M. Fentener van Vlissen, S. Kasanmoentalib, T. Visser, and H. Zwart (eds.), Recognizing the Intrinsic Value of Animals: Beyond Animal Welfare (Van Gorcum, Assen, 1999), pp. 29-37.
Verhoog, H., “The concept of intrinsic value and transgenic animals” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (5) (1992), 147-160.
Ward, L. G., “Food production-the price being paid by farm animals,” in A. J. F. Russell, C. A.Morgan, C. J. Savory,M. C. Appleby, and T. L. J. Lawrence (eds.), Farm animal welfare-who writes the rules? (Occasional Publication 23-British Society of Animal Science, 1999), pp. 33-38.
Warnock, M., A Question of Life (Blackwell, Oxford, 1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mepham, B. ``Würde der Kreatur'' and the Common Morality. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13, 65–78 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009587116907
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009587116907