Skip to main content
Log in

Is value conflict inherent in rural economic development? An exploratory examination of unrecognized choices

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rural development and economic change has generally been associated with growth and the in-migration of nonlocal firms or their branch plants and offices. Such change has been critiqued and at times resisted because of its implicit “urbanism” and conflict with rural values and modes of social interaction. The inevitability of the conflict has always been assumed, given the perspectives of development groups and many rural residents. This paper examines the apparent conflicts between the rural ethos and the “growth ethos,” and the considers the necessity for the pursuit of the forms of growth that tend to undermine rural values. The severely limited set of changes in the local economy considered by the common forms of growth-sponsoring economic development groups is then examined. Finally, the existence of alternative forms of economic change are hypothesized and their viability demonstrated. We conclude that improved economic well-being for rural residents need not sacrifice their values and lifestyles on the altar of urban-influenced “economic growth.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton, P. J. (1984) “Urbanization and the Dynamics of Suburban Development Under Capitalism.” pp. 54–81 in W. Tabb and L. Sawers (eds.)Marxism and the Metropolis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnekov, T., R. Boyle, and D. Rich. (1989)Privatism and Urban Policy in Britain and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, G., and D. Cameron. (1984)Ethics and Economics: Canada's Catholic Bishops on the Economic Crisis. Toronto: James Lorimer and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, E. J. (1989)Planning Local Economic Development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., and K. Deavers. (1987) “Rural Change and the Rural Economic Policy Agenda for the 1980's,” pp. 1–26, inRural Economic Development in the 1980's. Economic Research Service Staff Report AGES 870724, Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC: United States Govemment Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarnecki, J., H. Klodowski, and L. Milbrath. (1980) “Beliefs about Economic Growth.”Growth and Change (October): 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, P. (1986) “The Decline of Southern Rural Life,” in G. B. Tindall (ed),Education, Environment, and Culture: The Quality of Life in the South. Research Triangle Park, NC: The Southern Growth Policies Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, T., and M. Lapping. (1988) “The Rural Crisis and What to Do About It: An Alternative Perspective.”Economic Development Quarterly. II: 4, 339–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabenstott, M., M. Henry, and L. Gibson (1987) “The Rural Economic Policy Choice.”Economic Review LXXII: 1, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1964)The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. S. (1984)The Urban Experience. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J., and P.B. Meyer. (1986) “Recognizing Constraints to Local Economic Development.”J. of the Community Development Society of America. XVII:2 (Fall): 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fliegel, F. C. (1976) “A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Industrialism on Traditional Values.”Rural Sociology XXXXI: 4 (Winter): 431–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, N. J., and R. H. Wilson. (1986) “A National Context For Urban Economic Policy,” in E.M. Bergman (ed.)Local Economies in Transition: Policy Realities and Development Potentials. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (1984) “Capitalist Development and the History of American Cities,” pp. 21–53 in W. Tabb and L. Sawers (eds.)Marxism and the Metropolis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E., and G. Donohue. (1970) “Organizational Diversity as an Ideal Model,” inBenefits and Burdens of Rural Development: Some Policy Viewpoints. Iowa State University Center for Agricultural and Economic Development. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D., and J. Selb. (1990) “Toward One Relgion: Strengthening Rural-Urban Linkages.”Northwest Report. IX, 1.12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. (1950)Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure. New York: The Ronald Press Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howland, M., and T. Miller. (1990) “UDAG Grants to Rural Areas: A Program That Works.”Economic Development Quarterly IV:2 (May): 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L., and G. Harris. (1989) “Local Responses to Rapid Rural Growth: New York and Vermont Cases.”Journal of the American Planning Association LV: 2, 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, J. and L. Bender. (1985) “Nonmetropolitan Economic Bases and Their Policy Implications.”Growth and Change XVI:1, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. M. (1981)Economic Development Programs for Cities, Counties and Towns. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X., T. F. Buss, and M. Popovich. (1990) “Entrepreneurship is Alive and Well in Rural America: A Four-State Study.”Economic Development Quarterly IV: 3 (August): 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., and H. L. Molotch. (1987)Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, G., and C. Peek. (1974) “Location and Lifestyle: The Comparative Explanatory Ability of Urbanism and Rurality.”Rural Sociology XXIX (Fall): 392–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malizia, E. (1986) “Economic Development in Smaller Cities and Rural Areas.”Journal of the American Planning Association LII: 4, 489–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, R. C., and T. L. Napier. (1981) “Rural Residents' Perspectives of Industrial Development.”Rural Sociology XXXXVI: 1, 100–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, D. (1982) “Absentee and Local Ownership of Industry in Northwestern Wisconsin.”Growth and Change XIII (April): 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, P. B. (1987) “Defining Targets for Local Planning for Economic Development: Using Forced Choices as a Method for Priority-Setting,” paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning meetings, November.

  • —— (1991) “Local Development Decision Makers: How Current Commitments Shape Future Plans,” chapter in D. Fasenfest (ed.)Local Economic Development Policy Formation: Experiences in the United States and the United Kingdom. New York: Macmillan Press, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, P. B., and H. W. VanLandingham. (1983) “Economics Education and Public Policy: Continuing Education's Impact on Local Economic Development Policy in Pennsylvania,” paper presented at the Eastem Economics Association meetings, April.

  • Poplin, D. (1979)Communities. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, T. M. (1987) “The Folk Economics of Local Economic Development: The Self-defeating Strategies of Quantitative Growth.” A paper presented at the Conference on New Perspectives on Planning in the West. The University of Calgary. March.

  • Reed, C.M., B.J. Reed, and J.S. Luke. (1987) “Assessing Readiness for Economic Development Strategic Planning: A Community Case Study.”Journal of the American Planning Association LII: 4, 521–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (1988A) “The Rural Crisis and What to Do About It.”Economic Development Quarterly II: 2, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (1988B) “Response to Letter from Daniels and Lapping.”Economic Development Quarterly. II: 4, 342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, A. S., and E. M. Bergman. (1989)Making Connections: ‘After the Factory’ Revisited. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. P., and P. J. Usher. (1986)From the Roots Up: Economic Development as if Community Mattered. Croton-on-Hudson, New York: The Bootstrap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, J. E. and T. J. Volgy. (1988) “Experiments in Employment — A British Cure.”Harvard Business Review LXXXVIII: 2 (March–April): 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. T., Jr., and G. F. Summers. (1974) “Problems in Rural Communities after Industry Arrives.” Chapter 8 in L.R. Whiting (ed.),Rural Industrialization. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. D., and G. F. Summers. (1977)A Synthesis: How New Manufacturing Industry Affects Rural Areas. Mississippi State, MS: The Southern Rural Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, G. F. (1973)Large Industry in a Rural Area: Demographic, Economic, and Social Impacts. Working Paper RID73.19. Madison, Wisconsin: Center of Applied Sociology, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, G. F., and F. Clemente (1976) “Industrial Development, Income Distribution, and Public Policy.”Rural Sociology XXXXI (Summer): 248–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tefertiller, K. (1973) “Rural Development in an Urban Age.”American Journal of Agricultural Economics. LV: 5, 771–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindall, G. B. (1986)Education, Environment and Culture: The Quality of life in the South. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonnies, F. (1963)Community and Society ed. by C. F. Loomis. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. (1972)The Community in America, Second Edition. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, L. R. (1986)Equity: The Critical Link in Southern Economic Development. 1986 Commission on the Future of the South. Cross-cutting issue report no. 2. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widner, R. R., and M. E. Wolfgang (eds.). (1986) “Revitalizing the Industrial City.”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Volume 488 (November).

  • Willits, F., R. Bealer, and D. Crowder. (1973) “Leveling of Attitudes in Mass Society: Rurality and Traditional Morality in America.”Rural Sociology. XXXVIII (Spring): 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Peter B. Meyer is professor of Urban Policy at the University of Louisville. He was previously employed at The Pennsylvania State University where he directed the Local Economic Development Assistance Project, a research/technical assistance service to smaller cities, towns, and rural counties. Dr. Meyer's research interests are in processes of community and economic development in capitalist and third world countries and the ways in which processes and their outcomes are measured and valued.

Michael Burayidi is a doctoral student in Urban Policy at the University of Louisville. He holds a BSc(Hons) in Development Planning from the University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, where he also taught environmental planning, and a MEDes (Urban and Regional Planning) from the University of Calgary. His research interests are rural economic development and the socio-economic impacts of development programs on societal subgroups.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, P.B., Burayidi, M. Is value conflict inherent in rural economic development? An exploratory examination of unrecognized choices. Agric Hum Values 8, 10–18 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01591838

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01591838

Keywords

Navigation