Abstract
The concept of ‘complexity’ has become very important in theoretical biology. It is a many faceted concept and too new and ill defined to have a universally accepted meaning. This review examines the development of this concept from the point of view of its usefulness as a criteria for the study of living systems to see what it has to offer as a new approach. In particular, one definition of complexity has been put forth which has the necessary precision and rigor to be considered as a useful categorization of systems, especially as it pertains to those we call ‘living’. This definition, due to Robert Rosen, has been developed in a number of works and involves some deep new concepts about the way we view systems. In particular, it focuses on the way we view the world and actually practice science through the use of the modelling relation. This mathematical object models the process by which we assign meaning to the world we perceive. By using the modelling relation, it is possible to identify the subjective nature of our practices and deal with this issue explicitly. By so doing, it becomes clear that our notion of complexity and especially its most popular manifestations, is in large part a product of the historical processes which lead to the present state of scientific epistemology. In particular, it is a reaction to the reductionist/mechanistic view of nature which can be termed the ‘Newtonian Paradigm’. This approach to epistemology has dominated for so long that its use as a model has become implicit in most of what we do in and out of science. The alternative to this approach is examined and related to the special definition of complexity given by Rosen. Some historical examples are used to emphasize the dependence of our view of what is complex in a popular sense on the ever changing state of our knowledge. The role of some popular concepts such as chaotic dynamics are examined in this context. The fields of artificial life and related areas are also viewed from the perspective of this rigorous view of complexity and found lacking. The notion that in some way life exists ‘at the edge of chaos’ is examined from the perspective of the second law of thermodynamics given by Schneider and Kay. Finally, the causal elements in complex systems are explored in relation to complexity. Rosen has shown that a clear difference in causal relations exists between complex and simple systems and that this difference leads to a uniquely useful definition of what we mean by ‘living’. Rosen makes it very clear that the class of systems which are complex is a much larger class than those which we call living. For that reason, the focus of this review will be on complexity as a stepping stone towards the deeper question of what makes a system alive.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberts, B., D. Bray, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts and J.D. Watson (1994). Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York, Garland Pub. Co. (Third Ed.)
Altman, W.F. (1989). Apprentices of Wonder: Inside the Neural Network Revolution. New York. Bantam Books.
Blumenthal, R., S.R. Caplan and O. Kedem (1967). The coupling of an enzymatic reaction to transmembrane flow of electrical current in a synthetic ‘active transport’ system. Biophys. J. 7: 735–757.
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London, Routledge, Kegan and Paul.
Briggs, J. and D. Peat (1989). Turbulent Mirror. New York, Harper & Row.
Capra, F. (1982). The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising Culture. Bantam Books.
Casteneda, C. (1971). A Separate Reality: Further Conversations with Don Juan. New York, Pocket Books.
Casti, J.L. (1989). Newton, Aristotle, and the modeling of living systems. In: J. Casti and A. Karlqvist, eds., Newton to Aristotle: Toward a Theory of Models for Living Systems, pp. 11–37. Boston, Birkhäuser.
Casti, J.L. (1994). Complexification. New York, Harper Perennial.
Chaitin, G. (1987). Algorithmic Information Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Chaitin, G. (1992). Information-theoretic incompleteness. New York, World Scientific Press.
Chandrasekhar, S. (1961). Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. London, Oxford University Press.
Chua, L.O. and T.S. Parker (1989). Practical Numerical Algorithms for Chaotic Systems. New York, Springer- Verlag.
Dennet, D.C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston, Little, Brown and Co.
Depew, D.J. and B.W. Weber (1995). Darwinism Evolving. Cambridge, MA, M.I.T. Press.
Dewdney, A.K. (1993). Misled by metaphors: Two tools that don't always work. In: H. Haken, A. Karlqvist, and U. Svedin, eds., The Machine as Metaphor and Tool, pp 77–86. New York, Springer-Verlag.
Edmonds, B. (1995). What is complexity?- The philosophy of complexity per se with application to some examples in evolution. Evolution of Complexity Workshop, Einstein Meets Magritte, VUB, Brussels, 1995. (Also available electronically at: http://www.fmb.mmu.ac.ukt-bruce/evolcomp). 0
Fidelman, M.L. and D.C. Mikulecky (1988). Network thermodynamic Analysis and simulation of isotonic Solute-Coupled Flow in Leaky epithelia: An example of the use of network theory to provide the qualitative aspects of a complex system and its verification by simulation. J. theor. Biol. 130: 73–93.
Henry, C. (1995). Universal grammar. In: L. Rocha,ed., Self-reference in Cognitive Systems and Biological Systems, CC-AI 12: 45–62.
Hopfield, J.J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 2554–2558.
Hopfield, J.J. and D.W. Tank (1986). Computing with neural circuits: a model. Science 233: 625–633.
Fischler, M.A. and O. Firschein (1987). Intelligence: The eye, the brain, and the computer. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Horgan, J. (1995). From complexity to perplexity. Scientific American June, 1995: 104–109.
Kampis, G. (1991). Self-modifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Science: A New Framework for Dynamics, Information, and Complexity. New York, Pergamon Press.
Kaufmann, S.A. (1993). The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York, Oxford Univ. Press.
Kedem, O. and A. Katchalsky (1958). Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. Bioch. et Biophys. Acta 27: 229–247.
Kedem, O. and A. Katchalsky (1963a). Permeability of composite membranes: Part 1.- Electric current flow and flow of solute through membranes. Trans. Faraday Soc. 59: 1918–1930.
Kedem, O. and A. Katchalsky (1963b). Permeability of composite membranes: Part 2.- Parallel elements. Trans. Faraday Soc. 59: 1931–1940.
Kedem, O. and A. Katchalsky (1963c). Permeability of composite membranes: Part 3.- Series array of elements. Trans. Faraday Soc. 59: 1941–1953.
Levins, R. and R. Lewontin (1985). The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Univ. Press.
Levy, S. (1992). Artificial Life: the Quest for a New Creation. New York, Pantheon.
Lewin, R. (1992). Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. New York, Collier Books.
Maturana, H.R. and F.J. Varela (1980). Autopoieses and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Mikulecky, D.C. (1990). A comparison between the formal description of reaction and neural networks: a network thermodynamic approach. In: D.C. Mikulecky and A.M. Clarke, eds., Biomedical Engineering: Opening New Doors, pp 67–74. New York, New York University Press.
Mikulecky, D.C. (1993). Applications of Network Thermodynamics to Problems in B Biomedical Engineering. New York, New York University Press.
Mintz, E., S.R. Thomas and D.C. Mikulecky (1986a). Exploration of apical sodium transport mechanisms in an epithelial model by network thermodynamic simulation of the effect of mucosal sodium depletion: I. Comparison of three different apical sodium permeability mechanisms. J. theor. Biol. 123: 1–19.
Mintz, E., S.R. Thomas and D.C. Mikulecky (1986b). Exploration of apical sodium transport mechanisms in an epithelial model by network thermodynamic simulation of the effect of mucosal sodium depletion: II. An apical sodium channel and amiloride blocking. J. theor. Biol. 123: 21–34.
Mead, C. (1989). Analog VLSI and Neural Systems. New York, Addison-Wesley.
Oster, G.F., A. Perelson and A. Katchalsky (1973). Network thermodynamics: dynamic modeling of biophysical systems. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 6: 1–134.
Peacocke, A.R. (1985). Reductionism in Academic Disciplines. Surrey, SRHE & NFER-Nelson.
Peacocke, A.R. (1983). An Introduction to the Physical Chemistry of Biological Organization. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Peusner, I. (1970). The Principles of Network Thermodynamics and Biophysical Applications. Ph. D. Thesis, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University. (Reprinted by Entropy Limited, South Great Road, Lincoln, MA 01773, 1987).
Peusner, L. (1986). Studies in Network Thermodynamics. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
Prideaux, J.A., J.L. Ware, A.M. Clarke and D.C. Mikulecky (1993a). From Neural Networks to Cell Signalling: Chemical Communications among Cell Populations. J. Biol. Sys. 1: 131–146.
Prideaux, J.A., D.C. Mikulecky, A.M. Clarke and J.L. Ware (1993b). A Modified Neural Network Model of Tumor Cell Interactions and Subpopulation Dynamics. Invasion and Metastasis 13: 50–56.
Prideaux, J.A. (1996). Feed-Forward activation in a theoretical first-order biochemical pathway which contains an anticipatory model. (this volume).
Prigogine, I. (1961). Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. New York, Wiley.
Prigogine, I. and I. Stengers (1984). Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. New York, Bantam.
Rashevsky, N. (1954). Topology and life: In search of general mathematical principles in biology and sociology. Bull. Math. Biophys. 16: 317–348.
Rosen R. (1978). Fundamentals of Measurement. Amsterdam, North-Holland Publ.Comp.
Rosen, R. (1985a). Theoretical Biology and Complexity. London, Academic Press.
Rosen, R. (1985b). Anticipatory Systems. London, Pergamon.
Rosen, R. (1991). Life Itself. New York, Columbia Univ. Press.
Rosen, R. (1993a). Bionics revisited. In: H. Haken, A. Karlqvist, and U. Svedin, eds., The Machine as Metaphor and Tool, pp 87–100. New York, Springer-Verlag.
Rosen, R. (1993b). Drawing the boundary between subject and object: Comments on the mind-brain problem. Theoretical Medicine 14: 89–100.
Rosen, R. (1993c). Some random thoughts about chaos and some chaotic thoughts about randomness. J. Biol. Sys. 1: 19–26.
Rosen, R. (1994). On psychomimesis. J. theor. Biol. 171: 87–92.
Rosen, R. (1995). Cooperation and chimera. In: J.L. Casti and A. Karlqvist, eds., Cooperation & Conflict in General Evolutionary Processes. New York, Wiley.
Schneider, E.D. and J.J. Kay (1994). Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics. In: M. Witten and D.C. Mikulecky, eds., Modeling Complex Biological Systems. Mathl. Comput. Modelling 19: 25–48.
Stewart, J. (1966). Chaos et criticalité auto-organisée dans le systéme immunitaire, (this volume).
Thomas, S.R. and D.C. Mikulecky (1978). A network thermodynamic model of salt and water flow across the kidney proximal tubule. Am. J. Physiol. 235: F638-F648.
Ulanowicz, R.E. (1990). Aristotelian causalities in ecosystem development. Oikos 57: 42–48.
Varela, F.J. (1979). Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York, North Holland.
Varela, F.J., A Coutinho, and J. Stewart (1993). What is the immune network for? In: W. Stein and J. Varela, eds., Thinking About Biology, pp 215–230. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
Waldrop, M.M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York, Touchstone.
Walz, D., S.R. Caplan, D.R.L. Scriven and D.C. Mikulecky (1995). Methods of bioelectrochemical modelling. In: G. Millazzo, ed., Treatise on Bioelectrochemistry, pp 49–131. Basel, Birkhauser.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mikulecky, D.C. Complexity, communication between cells, and identifying the functional components of living systems: Some observations. Acta Biotheor 44, 179–208 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046527
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046527