Skip to main content
Log in

Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The latter half of thetwentieth century has been marked by debates inevolutionary biology over the relativesignificance of natural selection and randomdrift: the so-called ``neutralist/selectionist''debates. Yet John Beatty has argued that it isdifficult, if not impossible, to distinguishthe concept of random drift from the concept ofnatural selection, a claim that has beenaccepted by many philosophers of biology. Ifthis claim is correct, then theneutralist/selectionist debates seem at bestfutile, and at worst, meaningless. I reexaminethe issues that Beatty raises, and argue thatrandom drift and natural selection, conceivedas processes, can be distinguished from one another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beatty, J.: 1984, 'Chance and Natural Selection', Philosophy of Science 51, 183-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1987, 'Natural Selection and the Null Hypothesis', in J. Dupré (ed.), The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 53-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1992, 'Random Drift', in E.F. Keller and E.A. Lloyd (eds), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 273-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.: 1990, Adaptation and Environment, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R. and S. Carson: 1996, 'The Indeterministic Character of Evolutionary Theory: No 'No Hidden Variables' Proof But No Room for Determinism Either', Philosophy of Science 63, 315-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: [1859] 1964, On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, E.O. and P. Dodson: 1985, Evolution: Process and Product, Prindle, Weber and Schmit, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A.: 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J.: 1986, Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J.: 1988, 'Sturm Und Drang and the Evolutionary Synthesis', Evolution 42, 217-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, B.R. and Grant, P.R.: 1989, Evolutionary Dynamics of a Natural Population: The Large Cactus Finch of the Galápagos, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, L., Horan, B.L. et al.: 1999, 'Is Indeterminism the Source of the Statistical Character of Evolutionary Theory?', Philosophy of Science 66, 140-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M.J.S.: 1983, 'The Development of Darwin's General Biological Theorizing', in D.S. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 43-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M.J.S.: 1987, 'Natural Selection as a Causal, Empirical, and Probabilistic Theory', in L. Krüger (ed.), The Probabilistic Revolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 233-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, B.L.: 1994, 'The Statistical Character of Evolutionary Theory', Philosophy of Science 61, 76-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1970, Populations, Species, and Evolution, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1983, 'How to Carry Out the Adaptationist Program?', American Naturalist 121, 324-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millstein, R.L.: 1996, 'Random Drift and the Omniscient Viewpoint', Philosophy of Science 63, S10-S18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millstein, R.L.: 2000a, 'Chance and Macroevolution', Philosophy of Science 67, 603-624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millstein, R.L.: 2000b (unpublished), 'Is the Evolutionary Process Deterministic or Indeterministic? An Argument for Agnosticism', Presented at the Philosophy of Science Association conference, November 2000 in Vancouver, Canada.

  • Ridley, M.: 1996, Evolution, 2nd. Edition, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A.: 1988, 'Is the Theory of Natural Selection a Statistical Theory?', Canadian Journal of Philosophy (Suppl). 14, 187-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A.: 1994, Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T.: 1992, 'Selection, Drift, and the Aims of Evolutionary Theory', in P. Griffiths (ed.), Trees of Life: Essays in Philosophy of Biology, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 131-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Millstein, R.L. Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?. Biology & Philosophy 17, 33–53 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012990800358

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012990800358

Navigation