Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evidence-Based Medecine: Why Clinical Ethicists Should be Concerned

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  1. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21 st century. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laszlo A, Krippner S. Systems theories: Their origins, foundations and development. In Jordon JS; ed. Systems theories and a priori aspects of perception. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1998: 51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Plsek P. Redesigning health care with insights from the science of complex adaptive systems. In: Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001:309-323.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blumenthal D. Applying industrial quality management science to physicians' clinical decisions. In Blumenthal D, Scheck AC; eds. Improving clinical practice: TQM and the physician. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1995: 25-50.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M; eds. To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: Preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2001; 286: 415-420.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Noon CE, Hankins CT, Cote MJ. Understanding the impact of variation in the delivery of healthcare services. Journal of Healthcare Management, March-April 2003; 48(12): 82-99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berger ML, Nebenfuhr P. Murray RK. The value of disease management: Approaching the industrialization of modern medicine. Disease Management & Health Outcomes, October 2000; 8(4): 181-184.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wennberg DE. Variation in the delivery of health care: The stakes are high. (Editorial). Annals of Internal Medicine, May 15, 1998; 128(10): 866-869.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chassin MR, Galvin RW, and the National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1998; 280(11): 1000-1005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Christensen CM, Bohmer R, Kenagy J. Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harvard Business Review, September-October 2000; 78: 102-12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Core competencies for health care ethics consultation. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities; 1998.

  13. Detert J, Schroeder RG, Mauriel JJ. A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of Management Review, October 2000; 25(4): 850-863.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mills AE, Spencer EM. The healthcare organization: New efficiency endeavors and the organization ethics program. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 2002; 13(1): 31-41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Ann E. Mills
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edward M. Spencer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mills, A.E., Spencer, E.M. Evidence-Based Medecine: Why Clinical Ethicists Should be Concerned. HEC Forum 15, 231–244 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HECF.0000014772.77176.12

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HECF.0000014772.77176.12

Keywords

Search

Navigation