Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

More responses to the missing-explanation argument

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Blackburn, S 1993: “Circles, Finks, Smells and Biconditionals”, inPhilosophical Perspectives.

  • Jackson, F and Pargetter, R 1987: “An Objectivist's Guide to Subjectivism about Colour”, inRevue Internationale De Philosophie.

  • Jackson, F and Pettit, P 1990: “Program Explanantion: A General Perspective”, inAnalysis.

  • Johnston, M 1991: “Explanation, Response-Dependence and Judgement-Dependence” in P.Menzies (ed.)Response-Dependent Concepts ANU, Research School of Social Sciences, Working Papers in Philosophy, No. 1.

  • Johnston, M 1992: ‘The Missing-Explanation Argument and its Impact on Subjectivism’ (Public Lecture, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M 1993: “Objectivity Refigured: Pragmatism without Verificationism”, in C.Wright and J.Haldane (eds.)Reality, Representation, and Projection. (Oxford University Press).

  • Johnston, M 1994: Remarks on Response-Dependence” (Forthcoming).

  • McDowell, J 1979: “Virtue and Reason”, inThe Monist.

  • McDowell, J 1983: “Anti-realism and the epistemology of understanding”, in Parrett and Bouverresse (eds)Meaning and Understanding (De Gruyter).

  • Menzies, P and Pettit, P 1993: “Found: The Missing Explanation”, inAnalysis Vol.53 No. 2.

  • Menzies, P and Price, H 1993: “Causation as a Secondary Quality”, inBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

  • Miller, A 1995: “Objectivity Disfigured: Mark Johnston's Missing-Explanation Argument”, inPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research.

  • Pettit, 1991: “Realism and Response-Dependence”, inMind, NS Vol. 100.

  • Putnam, H 1981:Reason, Truth, and History, Cambridge University Press.

  • Sober, E 1982: “Why Logically Equivalent Predicates may Pick Out Different Properties”,American Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 19 No. 2.

  • Wright, C 1987a: “On Making Up One's Mind: Wittgenstein on Intention”, in Weingartner and Schurz (eds.)Logic, Science, and Epistemology Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C 1987b: “Realism, Antirealism, Irrealism, and Quasirealism”, inMidwest Studies in Philosophy.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Birmingham Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK

    Alexander Miller

Authors
  1. Alexander Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper is an expansion of a shorter paper I gave in response to Mark Johnston's “The Missing-Explanation Argument and its Impact on Subjectivism”, at the 11th Annual Michigan Colloquium in Philosophy on “Hume and Subjectivism”, at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, March 1992. I would like to thank Laura Schroeter, John Divers, Jim Edwards, Brian Garrett, Mark Johnston, Ted Hinchman, Philip Pettit, David Velleman, Crispin Wright and Steve

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, A. More responses to the missing-explanation argument. Philosophia 25, 331–349 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380038

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380038

Search

Navigation