Skip to main content
Log in

Social Enterprises and the Performance Advantages of a Vincentian Marketing Orientation

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Vincent saw his business dealings as a public trust. Managers trained in the Vincentian tradition must not only keep their eye on the profit line but on the effects their company policies have on the marginalized of society (Bowes 1998, p. 1666)

Abstract

This study focuses on the managerial issue of should social enterprises (SEs) become more marketing oriented. It adapts the Kohli et al. (J Mark Res 30:467–477, 1993) MARKOR marketing orientation scale to measure the adoption of marketing by SEs. The items capture Vincentian-based values to leverage business in service to the poor as a measure of a Vincentian marketing orientation (VMO). A VMO is an organisational wide value-driven philosophy of management that focuses a SE on meeting its objectives by adopting a more marketing orientated approach to serve the needy and poor in a just and sustainable manner. SEs that exhibit a VMO seek to understand and respond to both the needs of their beneficiaries and stakeholders. They are constantly generating, disseminating, and responding to environmental, beneficiary, and stakeholder information and develop their business propositions to more effectively and efficiently meet the needs of the poor, while guided by a philosophy of leveraging business for social good. This study of SEs in Australia found that a VMO is strongly and positively correlated with social, economic, and environmental performance. These findings suggest that SEs may benefit by leveraging marketing capabilities to better serve their beneficiaries and stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avlonitis, G. J., & Gounaris, S. P. (1997). Market orientation and company performance: Industrial vs. consumer goods companies. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(5), 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabanis, G., Stables, R. E., & Phillips, H. C. (1997). Market orientation in the top 200 British charity organizations and its impact on their performance. European Journal of Marketing, 31(8), 583–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barman, E. (2007). What is the bottom line for nonprofit organizations? A history of measurement in the British voluntary sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18, 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barraket, J., Collyer, N., O’Connor, M., & Anderson, H. (2010). Finding Australia’s social enterprise sector: Final report. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology and Social Traders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2008). Marketing of voluntary organizations as contract providers of national and local government welfare services in the UK. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19, 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borch, F. J. (1957). The marketing philosophy as a way of business life. New York: General Electric.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, J. C. (1998). St. Vincent de Paul and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(15), 1663–1667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darroch, J., Miles, M. P., Jardine, A., & Cooke, E. F. (2004). The 2004 AMA definition of marketing and its relationship to a market orientation: An extension of Cooke, Rayburn, & Abercrome (1992). Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 12(4), 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eversole, R., & Eastley, K. (2011). Tasmanian social enterprise study: Baseline study report. Cradle Coast: The Institute for Regional Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton, A. P. (1959). Making the marketing concept work. Harvard Business Review, 37, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, J. R., & Cowman, S. E. (2004). Toward a reliable and valid measure of institutional mission and values perception: The DePaul values inventory. Journal of Beliefs & Values: Studies in Religion & Education, 2, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, P., Fleckenstein, M., Primeaux, P. D., Schoaf, V., & Werhane, P. (2008). Introduction: The wide reach of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. (1984). Corporate innovation: Marketing and strategy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gainer, B., & Padanyi, P. (2002). Applying the marketing concept to cultural organisations: An empirical study of the relationship between marketing orientation and performance. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(2), 182–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kara, A., Spillan, J. E., & DeShields, O. W., Jr. (2004). An empirical investigation of the link between market orientation and business performance in non-profit service providers. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 12(2), 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, R. J. (1959). An interpretation of the marketing concept. In Advancing marketing efficiency, proceedings of the forty-first national conference. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

  • Keith, R. J. (1960). The marketing revolution. Journal of Marketing, 24, 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: A measure of marketing orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Levy, S. J. (1969). Broadening the concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33, 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazer, W. (1969). Marketing’s changing social relationships. Journal of Marketing, 33, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. (2012). Impacts of instrumental versus relational centered logic on cause-related marketing decision making. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1292-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrated framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 32(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, T. F. (1997). Vincent de Paul: A saint who got his worlds together. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. P., & Arnold, D. R. (1991). The relationship between marketing orientation and entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. P., Verreynne, M-L, Luke, B., Eversole, R., & Barraket, J. (2013). The development of a social value orientation scale: The nexus of Vincentian social values and entrepreneurship in social enterprises. Review of Business, 33(2), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mish, J., & Scammon, D. L. (2010). Principle-based stakeholder marketing: Insights from private triple-bottom-line firms. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(1), 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss-Kanter, R., & Summers, D. V. (2001). Doing well while doing good: Dilemmas of performance measurement in nonprofit organizations and the need for a multiple-constituency approach. In D. McKevitt & A. Lawton (Eds.), Public sector management: Theory, critique & practice (pp. 220–236). London: Sage.

  • Mottner, S., & Ford, J. B. (2005). Measuring non-profit marketing strategy performance: The case of museum stores. Journal of Business Research, 58, 829–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2009). ‘We do good things, don’t we?’: Blended value accounting in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 755–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 611–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, W. D., Cannon, J., & McCarthy, E. (2008). Basic marketing. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Placet, M., Anderson, R., & Fowler, K. M. (2005). Strategies for sustainability. Research Technology Management, 48(5), 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J. (2011). Transformative green marketing: Impediments and opportunities. Journal of Business Research, 64, 1311–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley-Duff, R. (2008). Social enterprise as a socially rational business. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 14(5), 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. (2004). Marketing in the social enterprise context: Is it entrepreneurial? Qualitative Market Research, 7(3), 194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N., & Uslay, C. (2007). Implication of the revised definition of marketing: From exchange to value creation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26(2), 302–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Vincent de Paul Society. (2004). The ethos of the St. Vincent de Paul Society in Australia. Lewisham: St. Vincent de Paul Society NSW/ACT Community and Corporate Relations Team.

  • Sullivan Mort, G., Weerawardena, J., & Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualisation. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez, R., Alvarez, L. I., & Santos, M. L. (2002). Market orientation and social services in private non-profit organizations. European Journal of Marketing, 36(9/10), 1022–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Chao, P., & Huang, G. (2009). Modelling market orientation and organizational antecedents in a social marketing context: Evidence from China. International Marketing Review, 26(3), 256–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morgan P. Miles.

Additional information

Submission to the 19th Annual international conference promoting business ethics conference’s special edition of the Journal of Business Ethics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miles, M.P., Verreynne, ML. & Luke, B. Social Enterprises and the Performance Advantages of a Vincentian Marketing Orientation. J Bus Ethics 123, 549–556 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2009-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2009-3

Keywords

Navigation