Skip to main content
Log in

SLOTE ON RATIONAL DILEMMAS AND RATIONAL SUPEREROGATION

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The so-called optimising conception of rationality includes (amongst other things) the following two claims: (i) that it is irrational to choose an option if you know there is a better one, and (ii) there are no situations in which an agent, through no practical fault of her own, cannot avoid acting irrationally. As part of his ongoing attempt to explain why we need to go beyond the optimising conception, Michael Slote discusses a number of examples in which it seems that (i) and (ii) are inconsistent. According to Slote, these situations seem to involve the existence of rational supererogation (a denial of (i)), or rational dilemmas (a denial of (ii)). The purpose of this paper is to examine Slote's arguments for these claims, and to propose an alternative solution to the problem he presents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Conee, E.: 1982, 'Against Moral Dilemmas', Philosophical Review 91, 87-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. and W. Harper: 1978, 'Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Expected Utility', in C. A. Hooker, J. J. Leach, and E. F. McClennen (eds.), Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory, Vol. I: Theoretical Foundations. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 125-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowans, C. W.: 1987, Moral Dilemmas, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, B.: 1970, An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics. In Hilpinen 1970: 121-147.

  • Hilpinen, R. (ed): 1970, Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. and R. Pargetter: 1986, 'Oughts, Options and Actualism', Philosophical Review 45, 233-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landesman, C.: 1995, 'When to Terminate a Charitable Trust?', Analysis 55.

  • Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, P.: 1995, 'The Confinement Problem: How to Terminate Your Mom and Her Trust', Analyst 11.5.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, T. C.: 1978, 'Moral Dilemmas and Consistency in Ethics', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8, 269-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1979, 'The Fragmentation of Value', in his Mortal Questions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. Z. and H. S. Price: 1967, 'Remorse without Repudiation', Analysis 28, 18-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. L.: 1983, 'How Do You Maximize Expectation Value?', Nous 17, 409-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinott-Armstrong, W.: 1988, Moral Dilemmas, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M.: 1989, Beyond Optimising: A Study of Rational Choice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. A. O.: 1965, 'Ethical Consistency', Proceeding of the Aristotelean Society 39, 103-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. A. O.: 1973, 'The Makropolus Case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality', in his Problems of the Self, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 82-100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mintoff, J. SLOTE ON RATIONAL DILEMMAS AND RATIONAL SUPEREROGATION. Erkenntnis 46, 111–126 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005337707418

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005337707418

Keywords

Navigation