Skip to main content
Log in

The Concept of Reputational Bliss

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A normative criterion identifying the conditions for a desirable corporate reputation, “reputational optimality,” or “reputational bliss,” is described, and a case developed for its utility and reasonableness as a criterion to apply to real world phenomena. The paper discusses some behavioral patterns under alternative moral positions taken by observers and the firm, critiques some alternative moral principles, and considers some dynamics of moving toward, defending and maintaining, and breaching or breaking reputational bliss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brenner S. N. (1995). Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Its Consistency with Current Management Techniques. In: Nasi J. (ed), Understanding Stakeholder Thinking. LSR-Publications, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb R. W., Elder C. D. (1972). Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D., Donaldson L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review 22(1):20–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., Dunfee T. W. (1999). Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan W. M., Freeman R. E. (1988). A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism. In: Beauchamp T. L., Bowie N. E. (eds), Ethical Theory and Business 3d edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P.: 1985, Norms, Deviance, and Social Control: Conceptual Matters (Elsevier, New York; distrib. by Greenwood Press, Westport, CT)

  • Hill C. W. L., Jones T.M. (1992). Stakeholder Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies (March) 29(2):131–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. C. (2002). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2):235–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review 20(2):404–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerber, R.: 2003, ‘Aaron Feuerstein’s Labor of Love a Throwback to a Patrician Era Fights an Uphill Battle to Regain Control of Company his Grandfather Founded’, The Boston Globe September 14, c.1

  • Logsdon J. M., Wood D.J. (2002). Business Citizenship: From Domestic to Global Level of Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2):155–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon J. F. (1989). Corporate Political Strategy. Business in the Contemporary World 2(1):50–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon J. F., McGowan R. A. (1996). Industry as a Player in the Political and Social Arena: Defining the Competitive Environment. Quorum Books, Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitnick B. M. (1981). The Strategic Uses of Regulation – and Deregulation. Business Horizons 24(2):71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitnick B. M. (1995). Systematics and CSR: The Concept of Normative Referencing. Business & Society 34(1):5–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitnick, B. M. and J. M., Mahon: 2003, ‘Aggregating Reputation: The Role and Use of Reputation-Sets’, Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the International Association for Business and Society, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, June 27–29

  • Preston L. E., Post J. E. (1975). Private Management and Public Policy: The Principle of Public Responsibility. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn D. P., Jones T. M. (1995). An Agent Morality View of Business Policy. Academy of Management Review 20(1):22–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed D. (2002). Employing Normative Stakeholder Theory in Developing Countries: A Critical Theory Perspective. Business & Society 41(2):166–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Mahon.

Additional information

Barry M. Mitnick is Professor of Business Administration and of Public and International Affairs at the University of Pittsburgh. His research interests center on failures in organizational control and the means by which desirable social outcomes can still be obtained. He was an originator of the theory of agency, and has also written on government regulation, incentive systems, implementation, corporate social performance, corporate political activity, corporate governance, and the concept of the public interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitnick, B.M., Mahon, J.F. The Concept of Reputational Bliss. J Bus Ethics 72, 323–333 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9173-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9173-7

Key Words

Navigation