References
Anderson, J.R. (1983).The Architecture of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Blackburn, S. (1981). “Rule following and moral realism”. In S.H. Holtzman and C.M. Leich (eds.),Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Blackburn, S. (1985). “Errors and the phenomenology of values”. In T. Honderich (ed.),Morality and Objectivity, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Churchland, P.S. (1986).Neurophilosophy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cummins, R. (1977). “Programs in the explanation of behavior”,Philosophy of Science, 44, 269–287.
Cummins, R. (1983). The Nature of Psychological Explanation,Cambridge, MA:MIT Press
Davidson, D. (1970). “Mental events”. In L. Foster and J.W. Swanson (eds.),Experience and theory, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Enc, B. (1983). “In defense of the identity theory”,The Journal of Philosophy, 80, 279–298.
Enc, B. (1986). “Essentialism without individual essence: causation, kinds and restricted identities.Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 9, 403–426.
Fodor, J. (1968).Psychological Explanation, New York: Random House.
Fodor, J. (1974). “Special sciences”.Synthese, 28, 77–115.
Fodor, J. (1983).The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gardner, H. (1985).The Mind's New Science, New York: Basic Books.
Goldman, A.I. (1986).Epistemology and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R. (1979). “The spandrals of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme”,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 205, 581–598.
Gregory, R.L. (1978).Eye and Brain, (34d ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
Haber, R.N. (1983). “The impending demise of the icon”,The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 91–130.
Hebb, D.O. (1949).The Organization of Behavior, New York: Wiley.
Marr, D. (1982).Vision, New York: W.H. Freeman.
Minsky, M. (1981). “A framework for representing knowledge”. In J. Haugeland (ed.),Mind Design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Montgomery, R. (1988). “The reductionist ideal in cognitive psychology”. Presented at the American Philosophical Association, Central Division Meetings, Cincinnati, April 30.
Montgomery, R. (1989). “Discrimination, reidentification and the indeterminacy of early vision,”Nous, 23, 4.
Nagel, E. (1961).The Structure of Science, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Nisbett, R. and Ross, L. (1980).Human inference: Strategies and Shortcomings in social Judgement, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Quine, W.V. (1969). “Epistemology naturalized”. InOntological Relativity and other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press.
Searle, J. (1970).Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sober, E. (1981). “The evolution of rationality”,Synthese, 46, 95–120.
Sperling, G. (1960). “The information available in brief visual presentations”,Psychological Monographs, 74, 11, Whole No. 448.
Stich, S. (1983).From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ullman, S. (1979).The Interpretation of Visual Motion, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montgomery, R. Does epistemology reduce to cognitive psychology?. Philosophia 19, 245–263 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380699
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380699