Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility Audit: From Theory to Practice

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the possibility of developing a new corporate social responsibility (CSR) auditing system based on the analysis of current CSR literature and interviews conducted with a number of interested and knowledgeable stakeholders. This work attempts to create a framework for social responsibility auditing compatible with an existing commercially successful environmental audit system. The project is unusual in that it tackles the complex issue of CSR auditing with a scientific approach using Grounded Theory. On the evidence discovered to date in the literature review and the interviews, CSR seems to be perceived by many as the social strand of sustainable development. However, there is far less agreement regarding its measurement. Both the literature review and the interview analysis indicate that developing an applied CSR auditing procedure will be a challenging task. This is principally due to the lack of formal study of this complex subject, which, despite the widespread debate it has engendered, still lacks a single and broadly accepted definition. The concepts developed from the findings of this research, together with the key factors identified in a literature review of CSR, were developed into a prospective CSR audit protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • C. A Adams (2004) ArticleTitleThe Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting-Performance Portrayal Gap Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 17 IssueID5 731–757

    Google Scholar 

  • G Brown (1973) ArticleTitleSome Thoughts on Grounded Theory Sociology 7 1–16 Occurrence Handle10.1177/003803857300700101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G Brundtland (Eds) (1987) Out Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D Cambell B Craven P Shrives (2003) ArticleTitleVoluntary Social Reporting in Three FTSE Sectors: A Comment on Perception and Legitimacy Auditing and Accountability Journal 16 IssueID4 558–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey. A., B. Holbrook and P. Atkinson: 1996, ‘Qualitative Data Analysis: Technologies and Representations’, Sociological Research On-line, 1, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/socresonline.

  • J Cramer (2005) ArticleTitleApplying International Standards and Guidelines on Corporate Social Responsibility: An Action Plan Environmental Quality Management 14 IssueID3 71–79 Occurrence Handle10.1002/tqem.20048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G Doming (2005) ArticleTitleTrust and Dialogue: Theoretical Approaches to Ethics Auditing Journal of Business Ethics 57 IssueID3 209–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J.: 1997, Cannibals with Folks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (Capstone, London).

  • Glaser, B. G.: 2001, The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description (http://www.groundedtheory.com/soc14.html), Sociology Press, Mill Valley California.

  • Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss: 1967, The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategy for Qualitative Research (Weidenfed and Nicolson, London).

  • Gonella, C., A. Pilling and S. Zadek: 1998, Making Values Count: Contemporary Experience in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting (ACCA, London).

  • D Hess (1999) ArticleTitleSocial Reporting: A Reflexive Law Approach to Corporate Social Responsiveness Journal of Corporate Law, Fall 25 IssueID1 41–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M.: 2000, ‘The measurement of corporate social responsibility’ MHC International Limited News, November 2000.

  • M Hopkins (2005) ArticleTitleMeasurement of Corporate Social Responsibility International Journal of Management and Decision Making 6 IssueID3/4 1 Occurrence Handle10.1504/IJMDM.2005.006549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J Igales J Gond (2005) ArticleTitleMeasuring Corporate Social Performance in France Journal of Business Ethics 56 IssueID2 131–148

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J Jones (2003) ArticleTitleAccounting for Biodiversity: Operationalising Environmental Accounting Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 16 IssueID5 762–789

    Google Scholar 

  • P Kok T Wiele Particlevan der R McKenna A Brown (2001) ArticleTitleA Corporate Social Responsibility Audit within a Quality Management Framework Journal of Business Ethics 31 285–297

    Google Scholar 

  • N Kuasirikun M Sherer (2004) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Accounting Disclosure in Thailand Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 17 IssueID4 629–660

    Google Scholar 

  • I Maignan D. A Raltson (2002) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations Journal of International Business Studies, 3rd Quarter 33 IssueID3 497

    Google Scholar 

  • McClenahen. J. S.: 2005, ‘Defining Social Responsibility’, Manufacturing and Society March, 64–65.

  • McIntosh, M., D. Leipziger, K. Jones and G. Goleman: 1998, Corporate Citizenship: Successful Strategies for Responsible Companies (FT, London).

  • M. P Miles L. S Munilla (2004) ArticleTitleThe Potential Impact of Social Accountability Certification on Marketing Journal of Business Ethics 50 IssueID91 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • G Rose (1982) Deciphering Social Research McMillan London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudnicki, M.: 2000, ‘Environmental and Social Responsibility as the Value in Modern politics’ paper delivered during meeting the OIKOS International Warsaw, 10 November 2000.

  • O Salzmann A Ionescu-Somers U Steger (2004) ArticleTitleThe Business Case for Corporate Sustainability European Management Journal 23 IssueID1 27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustain Ability: 1999, The Social Reporting Report (SustainAbility, London).

  • C Seale (1999) The Quality of Qualitative Research Sage Publications London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P.: 1975, ‘Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework’, California Management Review Spring 17(3).

  • A Strauss J Corbin (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research Sage Publications London

    Google Scholar 

  • C Valor (2005) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability Business and Society Review 110 IssueID2 191–212 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.0045-3609.2005.00011.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S Waddock (2004) ArticleTitleCreating Corporate Accountability: Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real Journal of Business Ethics 50 IssueID4 313–327 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000025080.77652.a3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. and M. Sillapää: 1997, The Stakeholder Corporation (Pitman, London).

  • R. K Yin (2003) Application of Case Study Research Sage Publications London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S., P. Pruvan and R. Evans (eds.): 1997, Building Corporate Accountability: Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting (Earthscan, London).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Risako Morimoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morimoto, R., Ash, J. & Hope, C. Corporate Social Responsibility Audit: From Theory to Practice. J Bus Ethics 62, 315–325 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5

Keywords

Navigation