Skip to main content
Log in

Decision Making and Business Ethics: The Implications of Using Image Theory in Preference to Rational Choice

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of decision making has multiple implications for business ethics. This paper outlines some commonly used frameworks for understanding choice in business. It characterises the dominant model for business decision making as rational choice theory (RCT) and contrasts this with a more recent, naturalistic theory of decision-making, image theory. The implications of using RCT and image theory to model decision making are discussed with reference to three ethical systems. RCT is shown to be consistent with Utilitarian ethics, but not with Kantian or Virtue-based ethics. Image theory is shown to be consistent with each. The paper identifies a number of implications following from this analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S.: 1965, 'Injustice in Social Exchange', in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2 (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderfer, C. P.: 1972, Existence, Relatedness and Growth (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1980, The Nichomachean Ethics, trans D. Ross (Hazell Books, Aylesbury).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A.: 1977, Social Learning Theory (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R.: 1990, Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organisational Contexts (Wiley, Chichester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R. (ed.): 1998, Image Theory: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations (Wiley, Chichester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R. and T. R. Mitchell: 1998, 'The Basics of Image Theory', in Beach L. R. (ed.), Image Theory: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations (Wiley, Chichester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R. and E. Strom: 1989, 'A Toadstool Among the Mushrooms: Screening Decisions and Image Theory's Compatibility Test', Acta Psychologica 72, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, H., M. Erickson, C. Stephenson and S. Williams: 2000, Myths at Work (Polity Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. and M. Knez: 1997, 'Co-ordination in Organisations: A Game-Theoretic Perspective', in Z. Shapira (ed.), Organisational Decision Making.

  • Chryssides, G. D. and J. H. Kaler: 1993, An Introduction to Business Ethics (Thomson, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T. and L. R. Beach: 1998, 'The Theory of Image Theory: An Examination of the Central Conceptual Structure', in L. Beach (ed.), Image Theory: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations.

  • Connolly, T. and K. Koput: 1997, 'Naturalistic Decision Making and the New Organisational Context', in Z. Shapira (ed.), Organisational Decision Making.

  • Dahrendorf, R.: 1979, Life Chances (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunegan, K. J.: 1998, 'Image Theory: Testing the Role of Image Compatibility in Progress Decisions', in L. Beach (ed.), Image Theory: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations.

  • Einhorn, H. J. and R. M. Hogarth: 1986, 'Decision Making Under Ambiguity', in R. Hogarth and M. Reder (eds.), Rational Choice (University of Chicago Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J.: 1999, Strong Feelings: Emotion, Addiction, and Human Behavior (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W. N. and M. L. Stevens: 1998, 'Commensuration as a Social Process', Annual Review of Sociology 24, 313–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H.: 1988, Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions (Norton, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, 'The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits', The New York Magazine, September 13 in Chryssides and Kaler, 1993, 249–254.

  • Garland, H.: 1990, 'Throwing Good Money After Bad: The Effect of Sunk Costs on the Decision to Escalate Commitment to an Ongoing Project', Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 728–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.: 1969, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Penguin, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S.: 2001, The Private Life of the Brain (Penguin, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. and S. Kanazawa: 1997, 'Sociological Rational Choice Theory', Annual Review of Sociology 23, 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F.: 1966, Work and the Nature of Man (World Publishing Company, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Highhouse, S. and P. Yüce: 1996, 'Perspectives, Perceptions, and Risk-Taking Behavior', Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65, 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes: 1771/1973, Leviathan (Dent and Sons, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M. and M. W. Reder: 1986, 'Perspectives from Economics and Psychology', in R. Hogarth and M. Reder (eds.), Rational Choice (University of Chicago Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M.: 1979, 'Power Failure in Management Circuits', Harvard Business Review (July-August), 65–75.

  • Langley, A., H. Mintzberg, P. Pitcher, E. Posada and J. Saint-Macary: 1995, 'Opening Up Decision Making: The View from the Black Stool', Organisation Science 63, 260–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. W. and T. R. Mitchell: 1994, 'An Alternative Approach: The Unfolding Model of Voluntary Employee Turnover', Academy of Management Review 19(1), 51–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K.: 1995, Human Resource Management: Rhetoric and Realities (MacMillan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C.: 1965, 'Toward a Theory of Motive Acquisition', American Psychologist 23, 321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue, 2e (Duckworth, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G.: 1997, 'Understanding How Decisions Happen in Organisations', in Z. Shapira (ed.), Organisational Decision Making.

  • Maslow, A.: 1954, Motivation and Personality (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B. A., A. Schwartz and A. D. J. Cooke: 1999, 'Judgment and Decision Making', Annual Review of Psychology 48, 447–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minzberg, H.: 1975, 'The Manager's Job: Folklore and Fact', Harvard Business Review (July-August), 49–61.

  • Morgan, G.: 1997, Images of Organization (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C.: 2001, The Fragility of Goodness, 2e (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W.: 1976, 'Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis', Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16, 366–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and J. Lawler: 1980, 'Effects of Job Alternatives, Extrinsic Rewards and Behavioral Commitment on Attitude toward the Organisation: A Field Test of the Insufficient Justification Paradigm', Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettinger, D. A. and R. Hastie: 2001, 'Content Effects on Decision Making', Organisational Behaviour and Decision Processes 85(2), 336–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.: 1771/1984, A Discourse on Inequality (Penguin, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R. and M. C. Brindle: 1997, 'The Social Ideologies of Power in Organizational Decisions', in Z. Shapira (ed.), Organisational Decision Making.

  • Schank, R. C. and R. P. Abelson: 1977, Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures (Lawrence Erblaum Associates, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, Z. (ed.): 1997, Organisational Decision Making (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1983, Models of Bounded Rationality (MIT Press, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.: 1953, Science and Human Behaviour (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B.: 1997, 'The Escalation of Commitment: An Update and Appraisal', in Z. Shapira (ed.), Organisational Decision Making.

  • Spies, K., F. Hesse and K. Loesch: 1997, 'Store Atmosphere, Mood and Purchasing Behavior', International Journal of Research in Marketing 14, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. and D. McHugh: 2002, Work Organisations, 3e (Palgrave, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahnemann: 1981, 'The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice', Science 211, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahnemann: 1986, 'Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions', in R. Hogarth and M. Reder (eds.), Rational Choice (University of Chicago Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P.: 2001, Organizational Behavior, 4e (Dryden, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G.: 2001, Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 5e (Prentice Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H.: 1964, Work and Motivation (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. J. and J. D. Westphal: 1997, 'Managerial Incentives in Organisations: Economic, Political and Symbolic Perspectives', in Z. Shapira (ed.), Organisational Decision Making.

  • Zey, M. (ed.): 1992, Decision Making: Alternatives to Rational Choice Models (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morrell, K. Decision Making and Business Ethics: The Implications of Using Image Theory in Preference to Rational Choice. Journal of Business Ethics 50, 239–252 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000024724.55553.c0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000024724.55553.c0

Navigation