Abstract
The increasing place of evolutionary scenarios in functional biology is one of the major indicators of the present encounter between evolutionary biology and functional biology (such as physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology), the two branches of biology which remained separated throughout the twentieth century. Evolutionary scenarios were not absent from functional biology, but their places were limited, and they did not generate research programs. I compare two examples of these past scenarios with two present-day ones. At least three characteristics distinguish present and past efforts: An excellent description of the systems under study, a rigorous use of the evolutionary models, and the possibility to experimentally test the evolutionary scenarios. These three criteria allow us to distinguish the domains in which the encounter is likely to be fruitful, and those where the obstacles to be overcome are high and in which the proposed scenarios have to be considered with considerable circumspection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, J. E., & Krebs, H. (1981). The evolution of metabolic cycles. Nature, 291, 381–382.
Behe, M. (2007). The edge of evolution: The search for the limits of Darwinism. New York: Free Press.
Buckling, A., Maclean, R. C., Brockhurst, M. A., & Colegrave, N. (2009). The Beagle in a bottle. Nature, 457, 824–829.
Chen, R., Greer, A., & Dean, A. M. (1995). A highly active decarboxylating dehydrogenase with rationally inverted coenzyme specificity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92, 11666–11670.
Dean, A. M., & Golding, G. B. (1997). Protein engineering reveals ancient adaptive replacements in isocitrate dehydrogenase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 3104–3109.
Dean, A. M., & Thornton, J. W. (2007). Mechanistic approaches to the study of evolution: The functional synthesis. Nature Reviews/Genetics, 8, 675–688.
Erwin, D. H., & Davidson, E. H. (2009). The evolution of hierarchical gene regulatory networks. Nature Reviews/Genetics, 10, 141–148.
Hurst, L. D. (2009). A positive becomes a negative. Nature, 457, 543–544.
Kerner, M. J., Naylor, D. J., Ishihama, Y., Maier, T., Chang, H.-C., et al. (2005). Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell, 122, 209–220.
Koshland, D. E., Nemethy, G., & Filmer, D. (1966). Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry, 5, 365–385.
Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506.
Miller, S. P., Lunzer, M., & Dean, A. M. (2006). Direct demonstration of an adaptive constraint. Science, 314, 458–461.
Monod, J., Wyman, J., & Changeux, J.-P. (1965). On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model. Journal of Molecular Biology, 12, 88–118.
Morange, M. (2009). When functional biologists propose mechanisms of evolution. Journal of Biosciences, 34, 373–376.
Read, A. F., & Allen, J. E. (2000). The economics of immunity. Science, 290, 1104–1105.
Rutherford, S. L., & Lindquist, S. (1998). Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature, 390, 336–342.
Stedman, H. H., Kozyak, B. W., Nelson, A., Thesier, D. M., Su, L. T., et al. (2004). Myosin gene mutation correlated with anatomical changes in the human lineage. Nature, 428, 415–418.
Tokuriki, N., Stricker, F., Serrano, L., & Tawfik, D. S. (2008). How protein stability and new functions trade off. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(2), e1000002.
Tokuriki, N., & Tawfik, D. S. (2009). Chaperonin overexpression promotes genetic variation and enzyme evolution. Nature, 459, 668–673.
Waddington, C. H. (1941). Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature, 150, 563–565.
Woese, C. R. (2001). Translation: In retrospect and prospect. RNA, 7, 1055–1067.
Zhu, G., Golding, G. B., & Dean, A. M. (2005). The selective cause of an ancient adaptation. Science, 307, 1279–1282.
Acknowledgments
I am indebted to Dr David Marsh for critical reading of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morange, M. How Evolutionary Biology Presently Pervades Cell and Molecular Biology. J Gen Philos Sci 41, 113–120 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-010-9123-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-010-9123-z