Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Private Equity and the Public Good

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dominance of agency theory can reduce our collective scope to analyse private equity in all its diversity and depth. We contribute to theorisation of private equity by developing a contrasting perspective that draws on a rich tradition of virtue ethics. In doing so, we juxtapose ‘private equity’ with ‘public good’ to develop points of rhetorical and analytical contrast. We develop a typology differentiating various forms of private equity, and focus on the ‘take private’ form. These takeovers are where private equity funds are used to buy all a firm’s publicly listed shares. Take private deals reduce reporting requirements and lessen the amount of public scrutiny a firm comes under. They allow greater control of a firm’s assets and resources but also have effects in terms of the wider social fabric. The ‘public good’ and virtue ethics offer an alternative basis for theorisation of these deals. This provides a needed contrast to accounts of private equity based on agency theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H.: 1992, ‘On The Idea Of Emancipation In Management And Organization Studies’, Academy of Management Review, 17(3): 432-464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1980, The Nichomachean Ethics (D. Ross, Trans.). Hazell Books, Aylesbury.

  • Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D., Robinson S. L. and Trevino, L.: 2008, ‘Reviewing Organizational Corruption’, Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670-684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L.: 2007. ‘Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility’, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B.: 2002, Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, D. and Elmes, M.: 1997, ‘Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse’, Academy of Management Review, 22 (2), 429-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearle, A. and Means, G.: 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, G. and Margulis, J.: 2005, Angel Capital: How to Raise Early-Stage Private Equity Financing (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., and Jones, T. M.: 1999, ‘Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5), 488–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, M.: 2008, ‘Two Principles of Broadcast Media Ownership for a Democratic Society’, Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 821–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BVCA: 2008, ‘BVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Performance Measurement Survey 2008’, Available on http://admin.bvca.co.uk/library/documents/Performance_Measurement_Survey_2008.pdf. Accessed 9th March 2010

  • Calás, M. B., and Smircich, L.: 1999, ‘Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions’, Academy of Management Review, 24, 649–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannella, A. A. and R. L. Paetzold.: 1994, ‘Pfeffer’s Barriers to the Advance of Organization Science: A Rejoinder’, Academy of Management Review, 19(2): 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcello, J. V.: 2009, ‘Governance and the Common Good’, Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1): 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.: 1977, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (CUP, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaterjee, S.: 2008, ‘Does Increased Equity Ownership Lead to More Strategically Involved Boards?’, Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I.: 2007, ‘Private Equity and HRM in the British Business System’, Human Resource Management Journal 17(3), 218–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S.: 1983, ‘The hierarchy of the sciences?’. American Journal of Sociology 89(1), 111–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D. and Johan, S.: 2007, ‘Socially Responsible Institutional Investment in Private Equity’, Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 395-416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R. and Cannella, A. A. (2003). ‘Introduction To Special Topic Forum Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data’, Academy of Management Review, 28, 3, 371–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D. and Dimov, D.: 2008, ‘Internal Knowledge Development and External Knowledge Access in Venture Capital Investment Performance’, Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 585-612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, S. and Konzelmann, S. J.: 2003, ‘After Enron: an age of enlightenment?’, Organization, 10(3), 583-587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbridge, R. and Ezzamel, M.: 2005, ‘The strength of difference: contemporary conceptions of control’, Organization, 12(5), 603-618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L.: 2005, ‘For positive management theories while retaining science: reply to Ghoshal’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 109-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, I. and Davis, J.: 1991, ‘Stewardship or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns’, Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I.: 2005, ‘Economics language & assumptions: how theories can become self-fulfilling’, Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I.: 2009, ‘How and Why Theories Matter: A Comment on Felin and Foss (2009)’, Organization Science, 20(3), 669–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I. and Toms, S.: 2006, ‘Corporate Governance and Financial Constraints on Strategic Turnarounds’, Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 407-433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, P., J. Froud, J. Sukhdev and K. Williams: 2006, ‘Working for Themselves? Capital Market Intermediaries and Present Day Capitalism’, Working Paper Series No. 25 (University of Manchester, Manchester).

  • Fraser-Sampson, G.: 2007, Private Equity As An Asset Class, (Wiley, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston, MA)

  • Frenkel, M., and Shenhav, Y. A.: 2006, ‘From binarism back to hybridity: A postcolonial reading of management and organization studies’, Organization Studies, 27, 855–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froud, J. and K. Williams: 2007, ‘Private Equity and the Culture of Value Extraction’, Working Papers Series No. 31 (Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change, University of Manchester).

  • Galbraith, J. K.: 1952, American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power (Penguin, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith J. K.: 1967, The New Industrial State (Penguin, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin, J.: 1998, ‘Modern Governance, Yesterday and Today: Some Clarifications to be Gained from French Government Policies’, International Social Science Journal, 50(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S.: 2005, ‘Bad management theories are destroying good management practices’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, J. and Wright, M.: 2008, Private Equity DeMystified: An Exploratory Guide (Corporate Finance Faculty, ICAEW, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • GMB/TSC: 2007, Report and Evidence submitted to the Treasury Select Committee on Private Equity as part of the GMB union submission, (GMB, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, S., Scillitoe, J. and Santoro, M. D.: 2008, ‘Tapping Deep Pockets: The Role of Resources and Social Capital on Financial Capital Acquisition by Biotechnology Firms in Biotechpharma Alliances’, Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1354-1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J.: 2009, ‘Do Markets Crowd Out Virtues? An Aristotelian Framework’ Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K.: 2007, ‘Learning to Lead: Can Aristotle Help Us Find the Road to Wisdom?’, Leadership, 3(2), 231-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R., Siegel, D. and Wright, M.: 2005, ‘Assessing the Impact of Management Buyouts on Economic Efficiency: Plant-Level Evidence from the United Kingdom’, Review of Economic and Statistics, 87, 148-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J. and Kelemen, M.: 2002, ‘Production and Consumption in Organizational Knowledge: The Case of the ‘Paradigms Debate’, Organization, 9(2), 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, P.: 2005, ‘Shareholder Primacy and the Distribution of Wealth’, Modern Law Review, 68(1), 49-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack, G., and Westwood, R.: 2006, ‘Postcolonialism and the politics of qualitative research in international business’, Management International Review, 46, 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. and Meckling, W.: 1976, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and Goldberg, L. D.: 1982, ‘Governing the large corporation: More arguments for public directors’, Academy of Management Review, 7, 603-611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. and Schoar, A.: 2005, ‘Private Equity Performance Returns, Persistence and Capital Flows’, Journal of Finance, 60(4), 1791-1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, T., Autio, E. and George, G.: 2008, ‘Corporate Venture Capital, Disembodied Experimentation and Capability Development’, Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1475-1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. and McCabe, D.: 1999, ‘Are there no limits to authority: TQM and organizational power’, Organization Studies, 20, 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R.: 2002 Aristotle: Political Philosophy, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., Wright, P. and Kroll, M.: 2006, ‘Paradox And Theorizing Within The Resource-Based View’, Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 115-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, V. P, Wong, Y. Y..: 2009, ‘Direct and Multiplicative Effects of Ethical Dispositions and Ethical Climates on Personal Justice Norms: A Virtue Ethics Perspective’ Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 279-294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. S.: 1943, ‘The Abolition of Man’, http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/lewis/abolition1.htm. Accessed 15 July 2009.

  • Lewis, J. D.: 2009, ‘Solon of Athens and the Ethics of Good Business’ Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 123-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J-F.: 1984, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Manchester University Press, Manchester).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue. Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R.: 1964, The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism. (Macmillan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., Casson, P., Nisar, T.: 2007, Investor Engagement- Investors and Management Practice Under Shareholder Value. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, D., Shivdasani, A. and Smith, C. W.: 1997, ‘Board Composition in the Life Insurance Industry’, Journal of Business, 70(1), 33–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, W., Mone, W. A. and Moon, G.: 1999, ‘Determinants and development of schools in organization theory’, Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 634–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Means, G.: 1930, ‘The Diffusion of Stock Ownership in the United States’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 44(4), 561-600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 2001, ‘Ethics Counselors as a New Priesthood’, Journal of Business Ethics, 29: 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 2008, ‘Ancient Observations on Business Ethics: Middle East Meets West’, Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 9-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K.: 2002, ‘Policy of decentralization and changing governance of higher education in post-Mao China.’ Public Administration and Development, 22(3), 261-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, K.: 2004, ‘Decision Making and Business Ethics: The Implications of Using Image Theory in Preference to Rational Choice’, Journal of Business Ethics 50, 239–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, K.: 2006, ‘Policy as Narrative: New Labour’s Reform of the National Health Service’, Public Administration 84(2), 367–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, K.: 2008, ‘The Narrative of ‘Evidence Based’ Management: A Polemic’, Journal of Management Studies 45(3), 613–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, K.: 2009, ‘Governance and the Public Good’, Public Administration 87(3), 538–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Roberts, J. A. and Chonko, L. B.: 2009, ‘The Virtuous Influence of Ethical Leadership Behavior: Evidence from the Field’ Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 157-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R., 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia. (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C.: 2001, The Fragility of Goodness, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, T. W.: 2009, ‘Reconsidering the Common Good in a Business Context’, Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 25-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, M.: 2000, Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orts, E. W. and Strudler, A.: 2009, ‘Putting a Stake in Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 605–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patashnik, E.: 2003, ‘After the Public Interest Prevails: The Political Sustainability of Policy Reform’, Governance, 16(2), 203–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L. and Rainey, H. G.: 1988, ‘The public-private distinction in organization theory: a critique and research strategy’, Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 182-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J.: 1993, ‘Barriers to the advance of organizational science: paradigm development as a dependent variable’, Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickhardt, M. 2005, ‘Some Remarks on Self-Interest, the Historical Schools and the Evolution of the Theory of Public Goods’, Journal of Economic Studies, 32(3), 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L. and Zenger, T.: 2002 ‘Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?’, Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707-725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A. and Perrini, F.: 2010, ‘Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs’ Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 207-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A.: 1954, ‘The pure theory of public expenditure’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B.: 2006, ‘Finance as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 19-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L. and Rynes, S.L.: 2005, ‘The role of management scholarship in the public sector’, Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 989–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shergold, P.: 1997, ‘The colour purple: perceptions of accountability across the Tasman’, Public Administration and Development, 17(3), 293-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K.: 1995, ‘Opening up Corporate Governance’, Human Relations, 48(8), 837-844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaramurthy, C. and Lewis, M.: 2003, ‘Control and collaboration: paradoxes of governance’, Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G.: 1984, ‘A (partial) rehabilitation of the public interest theory’, Public Choice, 42, 89-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J.: 1995, ‘Style as theory’, Organization Science, 6(1), 133–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D.: 2007, ‘Guidelines for Disclosure and Transparency in Private Equity’, http://walkerworkinggroup.com/sites/10051/files/wwg_report_final.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2008.

  • Webb, T., A. Stratton and I. Griffiths: 2009, ‘MG Rover: How the Phoenix Four Hit the Jackpot’, 11 September, www.guardian.co.uk. Accessed 27 September 2009.

  • Williamson, O.: 1964, The Economics of Discretionary Behaviour: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm. (Prentice Hall, New Jersey)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.: 1967, ‘Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size’, Journal of Political Economy, 75, 123-38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. and Lockett, A.: 2003, ‘The structure and management of alliances: syndication in the venture capital industry’, Journal of Management Studies 40, 2073-2102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. and Robbie, K.: 1998, ‘Venture capital and private equity: a review and synthesis’, Journal of Business and Accounting, 25(5/6), 521-70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zald, M. N. (1996). ‘More fragmentation? Unfinished business in linking the social sciences and the humanities’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 251–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.

    Kevin Morrell & Ian Clark

Authors
  1. Kevin Morrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ian Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Morrell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morrell, K., Clark, I. Private Equity and the Public Good. J Bus Ethics 96, 249–263 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0463-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0463-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation