Skip to main content
Log in

When warrant transmits and when it doesn’t: towards a general framework

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we focus on transmission and failure of transmission of warrant. We identify three individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for transmission of warrant, and we show that their satisfaction grounds a number of interesting epistemic phenomena that have not been sufficiently appreciated in the literature. We then scrutinise Wright’s analysis of transmission failure and improve on extant readings of it. Nonetheless, we present a Bayesian counterexample that shows that Wright’s analysis is partially incoherent with our analysis of warrant transmission and prima facie defective. We conclude exploring three alternative lines of reply: developing a more satisfactory account of transmission failure, which we outline; dismissing the Bayesian counterexample by rejecting some of its assumptions; reinterpreting Wright’s analysis to make it immune to the counterexample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chandler J. (2010) The transmission of support: A Bayesian re-analysis. Synthese 176: 333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert A. P. (2005) Transmission of warrant-failure and the notion of epistemic analyticity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83: 505–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, L. (2011). Wright, Okasha and Chandler on transmission failure. Synthese doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9771-x.

  • Okasha S. (2004) Wright on the transmission of support: A Bayesian analysis. Analysis 64: 139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silins N. (2005) Transmission failure failure. Philosophical Studies 126: 71–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M. (2009) Transmission failure explained. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79: 164–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon S. (2008) Reason and the grain of belief. Nous 42: 139–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker C. (2010) When transmission fails. Philosophical Review 119: 497–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (2000) Knowledge and its limits. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright C. (1985) Facts and certainty. Proceedings of the British Academy 71: 429–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright C. (2002) (Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: G. E. Moore and John McDowell. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 330–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright C. (2003) Some reflections on the acquisition of warrant by inference. In: Nuccetelli S. (ed.) New essays on semantic externalism and self-knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 57–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright C. (2004) Warrant for nothing (and foundations for free?). Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 78: 167–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright C. (2007) Perils of dogmatism. In: Nuccetelli S. (ed.) Themes from G. E. Moore: New essays in epistemology and ethics. OUP, Oxford, pp 25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright C. (2011) McKinsey one more time. In: Hatzimoysis A. (ed.) Self-knowledge. OUP, Oxford, pp 80–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Piazza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moretti, L., Piazza, T. When warrant transmits and when it doesn’t: towards a general framework. Synthese 190, 2481–2503 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0018-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0018-2

Keywords

Navigation