Abstract
The construct of cognitive moral development seemingly has powerful practical relevance in many areas of life. Nonetheless, moral reasoning seems of marginal relevance at best in the context of business ethics. Simply put, moral reasoning measurement indices are often only weakly related to many other apparently pertinent variables, and such findings cast doubt upon the construct validity of cognitive moral development. Many such unexpectedly weak relationships, however, may stem from two largely unrecognized methodological artifacts. The first artifact is an almost total reliance on the P index of the Defining Issues Test (DIT) designed to assess moral development even when this index may be inappropriate in a particular context. A second artifact that seems particularly salient in the context of attitudes toward authority involves a not always appropriate reliance on samples that include respondents whose moral reasoning is uncoupled from their action choices. These artifacts may restrict the amount of variance explained in observed relationships, and thus constrain the potential for moral reasoning to understand and explain behavior and attitudes relevant in the context of business ethics. Researchers are urged to use DIT D scores (in addition to P scores) in specific situations, and to examine relationships among high DIT U scorers whose moral reasoning is tightly coupled with their action choices. The application of these guidelines may have profound implications for advancing our fundamental understanding of moral reasoning, and of increasing its relevance to business ethics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alker, H. A. and P. J. Poppen: 1973, ‘Personality and Ideology in University Students’, Journal of Personality 41, 653–671.
Altemeyer, B.: 1988, Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-wing Authoritarianism (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
Altemeyer, B.: 1996, The Authoritarian Specter (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
Altemeyer, B.: 1998, ‘The Other “Authoritarian Personality”’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 30, 47–92.
Blasi, A.: 1980, ‘Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature’, Psychological Bulletin 88, 1–45.
Brower, H. H. and C. B. Shrader: 2000, ‘Moral Reasoning and Ethical Climate: Not-for-profit vs. For-profit Boards of Directors’, Journal of Business Ethics 26, 147–167.
Chang-Ho, C. J.: 1997, ‘Collectivism in Moral Development’, Psychological Reports 80, 967–975.
Clouse, B.: 1985, ‘Moral Reasoning and Christian Faith’, Journal of Psychology and Theology 13, 190–198.
Elm, D. R. and J. Weber: 1994, ‘Measuring Moral Judgment: The Moral Judgment Interview or the Defining Issues Test?’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 341–355.
Ford, J. B., M. S. LaTour, S. J. Vitell and W. A. French: 1997, ‘Moral Judgment and Market Negotiations: A Comparison of Chinese and American Managers’, Journal of International Marketing 5(2), 57–76.
Forsyth, D. R.: 1980, ‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 175–184.
Franz, C. E. and D. C. McClelland: 1994, ‘Lives of Women and Men Active in the Social Protests of the 1960s: A Longitudinal Study’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, 196–205.
Glover, R. J.: 1994, ‘Using Moral and Epistemological Reasoning as Predictors of Prejudice’, Journal of Social Psychology 134, 633–640.
Glover, R. J.: 1997, ‘Relationships in Moral Reasoning and Religion among Members of Conservative, Moderate, and Liberal Religious Groups’,Journal of Social Psychology 137, 247–254.
Green, S. and J. Weber: 1997, ‘Influencing Ethical Development: Exposing Students to the AICPA Code of Conduct’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 777–790.
Ho, F. N., S. J. Vitell, J. H. Barnes and R. Desborde: 1997, ‘Ethical Correlates of Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity in Marketing: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Moral Development’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25, 117–126.
Kohlberg, L.: 1976, ‘Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-developmental Approach’, in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York), pp. 31–53.
Lasson, E. D. and A. R. Bass: 1997, ‘Integrity Testing and Deviance: Construct Validity Issues and the Role of Situational Factors’, Journal of Business and Psychology 12, 121–146.
Levenson, M. R.: 1990, ‘Risk Taking and Personality’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, 1073–1080.
MacCallum, J. A.: 1993, ‘Teacher Reasoning and Moral Judgement in the Context of Student Discipline Situations’, Journal of Moral Education 22, 3–17.
Marnburg, E.: 2001, ‘The Questionable Use of Moral Development Theory in Studies of Business Ethics: Moral Reasoning 235 Discussion and Empirical Findings’, Journal of Business Ethics 32, 275–283.
Pratt, M. W., M. L. Arnold, A. T. Pratt and R. Diessner: 1999, ‘Predicting Adolescent Moral Reasoning from Family Climate: A Longitudinal Study’, Journal of Early Adolescence 19, 148–175.
Presley, S. L.: 1985, ‘Moral Judgment and Attitudes toward Authority of Political Resisters’, Journal of Research in Personality 19, 135–151.
Rest, J. R.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).
Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Theory and Research (Praeger, New York).
Rest, J., D. Narvaez, M. J. Bebeau and S. J. Thoma: 1999, Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).
Rest, J., S. J. Thoma, D. Narvaez and M. J. Bebeau: 1997, ‘Alchemy and Beyond: Indexing the Defining Issues Test’, Journal of Educational Psychology 89, 498–507.
Rim, Y.: 1992, ‘Moral Development and Coping Styles’, Personality and Individual Differences 13, 627–629.
Rotenberg, K. J., M. G. Hewlett and C. M. Siegwart: 1998, ‘Principled Moral Reasoning and Selfmonitoring as Predictors of Jury Functioning’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 20, 167–173.
Rushton, J. P., R. D. Chrisjohn and G. C. Fekken: 1981, ‘The Altruistic Personality and the Selfreport Altruism Scale’, Personality and Individual Differences 2, 293–302.
Self, D. J., M. Olivarez and D. C. Baldwin Jr.: 1998, ‘The Amount of Small-group Case-study Discussion Needed to Improve Moral Reasoning Skills of Medical Students’, Academic Medicine 73, 521–523.
Thoma, S. J.: 1993, ‘The Relationship Between Political Preference and Moral Judgment Development in Late Adolescence’, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 39, 359–374.
Thoma, S. J. and J. R. Rest: 1999, ‘The Relationship Between Moral Decision Making and Patterns of Consolidation and Transition in Moral Judgment Development’, Developmental Psychology 35, 323–334.
Thoma, S. J., R. Barnett, J. Rest and D. Narvaez: 1999, ‘What Does the DIT Measure?’, British Journal of Social Psychology 38, 103–111.
Thoma, S. J., J. R. Rest and M. L. Davison: 1991, ‘Describing and Testing a Moderator of the Moral Judgment and Action Relationship’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 659–669.
Trevino, L. K. and S. A. Youngblood: 1990, ‘Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-making Behavior’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 378–385.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mudrack, P.E. The Untapped Relevance of Moral Development Theory in the Study of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 42, 225–236 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022229305960
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022229305960