Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reflections on the revolution at Stanford

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We inquire into the question whether the Aristotelian or classical ideal of science has been realised by the Model Revolution, initiated at Stanford University during the 1950s and spread all around the world of philosophy of science—salute Suppes. The guiding principle of the Model Revolution is: a scientific theory is a set of structures in the domain of discourse of axiomatic set-theory, characterised by a set-theoretical predicate. We expound some critical reflections on the Model Revolution; the conclusions will be that the philosophical problem of what a scientific theory is has not been solved yet—pace Suppes. While reflecting critically on the Model Revolution, we also explore a proposal of how to complete the Revolution and briefly address the intertwined subject of scientific representation, which has come to occupy center stage in philosophy of science over the past decade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balzer W., Moulines C. U., Sneed J. D. (1987) An architectonic for science: The structuralist program. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beth E.W. (1968) The foundations of mathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R.J. (eds) (1979) Patrick Suppes. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R. (1966) Philosophical foundations of physics. An introduction to the philosophy of science. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • da Costa N. C. A., Chuaqui R. (1988) On Suppes’ set-theoretical predicates. Erkenntnis 29: 95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Costa N. C. A., French S. (1990) The model-theoretic approach in the philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science 57: 248–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, W. R., & Betti, A. (2008). The classical model of science: A millennia-old model of scientific rationality. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9417-4.

  • Díez, J. A. (1997). A hundred years of numbers. An historical introduction to measurement theory 1887–1990. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 28(Part I), 167–185, Part II, 237–265.

  • French S. (2003) A model-theoretic account of representation. Philosophy of Science (PSA Proceedings) 70: 1472–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French S., Ladyman J. (1999) Reinflating the semantic approach. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13(2): 103–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frigg R. (2006) Scientific representation and the semantic view of theories. Theoria 55: 49–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere R. N. (1988) Explaining science. A cognitive approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere R. N. (2004) How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71: 742–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys P. (1994) Patrick Suppes: Scientific philosopher (Volumes 2). Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krantz D. H., Luce R. D., Suppes P., Tversky A. (1971) Foundations of measurement (Vol. 1). Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey J. C. C., Sugar A. C., Suppes P. (1953) Axiomatic foundation of classical particle mechanics. Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis 2: 253–272

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey J. C. C., Suppes P. (1953) Transformations of systems of classical particle mechanics. Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis 2: 272–289

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey J. C. C., Suppes P. (1955) On the notion of invariance in classical mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5: 290–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.S., Morrison, M. (eds) (1999) Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller F. A. (1998) Structures for everyone. A. Gerits & Son, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller F. A. (2005) The deep black sea: Observability and modality afloat. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56: 61–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller F. A., Van Fraassen B. C. (2008) How to talk about unobservables. Analysis 68(3): 197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien C.C. (1967) Burke. Relfections on the revolution in France. Penguin Books, Middlesex, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1960/1962). What theories are not. In E. Nagel, P. Suppes, & A. Tarski (Eds.), Logic, methodology and philosophy of science: Proceedings of the 1960 international congress (pp. 240–251). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

  • Rantala V. (1978) The old and the new logic of metascience. Synthese 39: 233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneed J. D. (1979) The logical structure of mathematical physics. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller W. (1976) The structure and dynamics of theories. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez M. (2003) Scientific representation: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17(3): 225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppe F. (1974) The search for philosophic understanding of scientific theories. In: Suppe F. (eds) The structure of scientific theories. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp 6–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P. (1954) Some remarks on the problems and methods of the philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science 21: 242–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P. (1960) A comparison of the meaning and use of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences. Synthese 12: 287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P. (1961) Studies in the methodology and foundations of science. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P. (1968) The desirability of formalisation in science. Journal of Philosophy 65: 651–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P. (1974) The structure of theories and the analysis of data. In: Suppe F. (eds) The structure of scientific theories. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp 266–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P. (1992) Axiomatic methods in science. In: Carvallo M. E. (eds) Nature, cognition and system II. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 205–232

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P. (1993) Models and methods in the philosophy of science. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (2002). Representation and invariance of scientific structures. (Stanford: Centre for Logic, Language and Computation (distributed by Chicago University Press))

  • Toulmin S. (1974) The structure of scientific theories. In: Suppe F. (eds) The structure of scientific theories. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp 600–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen B. C. (1980) The scientific image. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen B. C. (1989) Laws and symmetries. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burg. Oudlaan 50, H5-16, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    F. A. Muller

  2. Institute for the History and Foundations of Science, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 6, IGG-3.08, 3584 CD, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    F. A. Muller

Authors
  1. F. A. Muller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. A. Muller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muller, F.A. Reflections on the revolution at Stanford. Synthese 183, 87–114 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9669-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9669-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation