Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a Confucian Ethic of the Gift

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this essay I discuss how the relational ethic characteristic of Classical Confucianism articulates an ethic of gift exchange. I first discuss the tradition that Confucius appropriated and show that the gift was utilized to form, maintain, and symbolize social relationships in Shang, Zhou, and Warring States China. I then go on to discuss the implications of this view by addressing two difficulties of gift exchange that are often discussed in the literature: the use of gifts to indebt or control others and the inability of the gift to fully express one’s sentiments. This essay not only shows that Confucian ethics has much to say on the matter but also demonstrates that ritual action is still relevant in modern contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont Jr. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger T., and David L. Hall. 1987. Thinking Through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1990. Thinking From the Han: Self, Truth, and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Bataille, Georges. 1991. The Accursed Share (Volume One). New York: Zone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. 1993. “Neolithic Jade Blades: Feast and Ritual.” Orientations 24.12: 59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K. C. 1975. “Ancient Trade as Economics or as Ecology.” In Ancient Civilization and Trade. Ed. By J.A. Sabloff and C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1976. “Changing Relationships of Man and Animal in Shang and Chou Myths and Art.” In Early Chinese Civilization: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • _____. 1980. Shang Civilization. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • _____. 1983. Art, Myth, and Ritual: The Path to Political Authority in Ancient China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Cook, Constance A. 1997. “Wealth and the Western Zhou.” Bulletin of the School Of Oriental and African Studies 60.2: 253–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Eugene. 1982. “The Potlatch in Ancient China: Parallels in the Sociopolitical Structure of the Ancient Chinese and American Indians of the Northwest Coast.” History of Religions 22.2: 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creel, H.G. 1970. The Origins of Statecraft in China: The Western Chou Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1992. Given Time: 1. Counterfeit Money. Trans. by Peggy Kamuf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Earle, Timothy K. 1997. How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy in Prehistory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 1968. The Selected Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Ed. by Brooks Atkinson. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eno, Robert. 1990. The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert. 1972. Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. Prospect Heights: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Ursula Martius. 1983. “On Bronze and Other Metals in Early China.” In The Origins Of Chinese Civilization, ed. By David N. Keightley. Berkeley: University of California Press: 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, C.A., 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, Maurice, Nora Scott, trans. 1999. The Enigma of the Gift. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goux, Jean-Joseph. 2002. “Seneca Against Derrida: Gift and Alterity.” In The Enigma of Gift and Sacrifice, ed. by Edith Wyschogrod and Eric Boynton. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, Lewis. 1983. The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2002. Ethics in the Confucian Tradition: The Thought of Mengzi and Wang Yangming. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, David. 1978. “The Religious Commitment: Shang Theology and the Genesis Of Chinese Political Culture.” History of Religions 17.3/4: 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1983. “The Late Shang State: When, Where, and What?” In The Origins of Chinese Civilization. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  • _____. 1988. “Shang Divination and Metaphysics.” In Philosophy East and West 38: 367–397.

  • _____. 2000. The Ancestral Landscape: Time, Space, and Community in Late Shang China. Berkley: University of California Press.

  • Lau, D.C. 2003. Mencius. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, James. 1865. The Chinese Classics. The Shoo King, Vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1885. The Sacred Books of the East: The Texts of Confucianism. Vol. 4, The Li Ki.

  • Levinas, Emmanuel, Alphonso Lingis, trans. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Chenyang, 2006. “The Confucian Ideal of Harmony.” In Philosophy East and West 56.4: 583–603.

  • _____, ed. 2000. The Sage and the Second Sex. New York: Open Court.

  • Mauss, Herbert, W.D. Halls, trans. 1990. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. New York: W.W. Norton. Originally published as Essai su le Don. Presses Universitaires de France in “Sociologie et Anthropologie,” 1950.

  • _____ and Henri Hubert, W.D. Halls, trans. 1964. Sacrifice: Its Nature and Function. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • McKeon, Richard, ed. 1968. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivison, D. 1978. “Royal ‘Virtue’ in Shang Oracle Inscriptions.” Early China 4: 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor, and James Walker, ed. 2003. Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry J., Block M. 1989. Money and the Morality of Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, Janet, ed. 2000. Order, Legitimacy, and Wealth in Ancient States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall 1991. “The Spirit of the Gift.” In The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity, ed. by Schrift, Alan D. London: Routledge: 70–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1972. Stone Age Economics New York: Aldine.

  • Schrift, Alan D., ed. 1991. The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, Edward L. 1991. Sources of Western Zhou History: Inscribed Bronze Vessels. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Trans. and ed. by Kurt H. Wolff. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steidlmeier, P. 1999. “Gift Giving, Bribery and Corruption: Ethical Management of Business Relationships in China.” Journal of Business Ethics 20.2: 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southall, Aidan. 1987. “The Segmentary State in Africa and Asia.” Comparative Study Of Society and History. 30: 52–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Weiming. 1998. “Probing the ‘Three Bonds’ and the ‘Five Relationships’ in Confucian Humanism.” In Confucianism and the Family. Ed. by Walter H. Slote and George A. De Vos. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, William. 1971. Cultural Frontiers in Ancient East Asia. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, A.B. 1990. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, Paul. 1971. The Pivot of the Four Quarters: A Preliminary Enquiry into the Origins and Character of the Ancient Chinese City. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Mayfair. 1994. Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric C. Mullis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mullis, E.C. Toward a Confucian Ethic of the Gift. Dao 7, 175–194 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9049-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9049-x

Keywords

Navigation