Abstract
A spate of recent anti-localizationist publications have re-ignited the old debate about the localization of function. Many of the recent attacks on localization, however, are directed at what I will argue to be a narrow and outmoded view of localization, and thus have little conceptual or empirical impact. What I hope to present here is an analysis of functional localization that more adequately reflects the sophistication and complexity of its use in neuroscientific research, both historically and recently. Proceeding first by way of contrast, I examine theanti-localizationist positions of holism andequipotentiationism. Then, I present a four-fold analysis of localization according to physical scope, physical kind, functional scope, and functional kind. Next, I turn to a discussion of the heuristic value oflocalization in deciphering structure-functionrelationships. Finally, I hope to show that the overall view of functional localization that emerges from these considerations constitutes a much more elusive target than its critics assume. It serves to mitigate, and insome instances even defeat, some forms ofanti-localizationist criticisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle, 1941: The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited and with an introduction by Richard McKeon. Random House, New York.
Bechtel, W., 2001: The compatibility of complex systems and reduction: a case analysis of memory research, Minds and Machines 11, 483–502.
Bechtel, W., 2002: Decomposing the mind–brain: a long–term pursuit, Brain and Mind 3, 229–242.
Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R., 1993: Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Bickle, J., 2001: Understanding neural complexity: A role for reduction, Minds and Machines 11, 467–481.
Brodmann, K., 1909: Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Barth, Leipzig. Translated into English and edited by L.J. Garey, 1994: Brodmann's ‘Localisation in the Cerebral Cortex’, Smith–Gordon, London.
Clarke, E. and Jacyna, L.S., 1987: Nineteenth–Century Origins of Neuroscientific Concepts, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Finger, S., 1994: The Origins of Neuroscience, Oxford University Press, New York.
Fodor, J., 1974: Special sciences, or: disunity of science as a working hypothesis, Synthese 28, 97–115.
Fodor, J., 1983: The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Goltz, F., 1888: Ñber die Verrichtungen des Grosshirns, Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie 42, 419–467, in G. von Bonin (ed., transl.), 1960: Some Papers on The Cerebral Cortex, as, On the functions of the hemispheres, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp. 118–158.
Graziano, M.S.A., Taylor, S.R. and Moore, T., 2002: Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex. Neuron 34, 841–851.
Kandel, E., Schwartz, J. and Jessell, T., 2001: Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed., McGraw–Hill, New York.
Kertesz, A. (ed.), 1994: Localization and Neuroimaging in Neuropsychology, Harcourt Brace/Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Lashley, K., 1933: Integrative functions of the cerebral cortex, Physiological Reviews 13, 1–42.
Lashley, K. and Clark, G., 1946: The cytoarchitecture of the cerebral cortex of Ateles: A critical examination of architectonic studies, Journal of Comparative Neurology 85, 223–305.
Lloyd, D., 2000: Terra cognita: From functional neuroimaging to the map of the mind, Brain and Mind 1, 93–116.
Marshall, J.C., 2001: Bumps on the brain, Nature 414, 151–152.
Mundale, J., 1998: Brain mapping, in W. Bechtel and G. Graham (eds), A Companion to Cognitive Science, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 129–139.
vanOrden, G. and Paap, K., 1997: Functional neuroimages fail to discover pieces of mind in the parts of the brain, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings), S85–S94.
Papez, J.W., 1953: Theodor Meynert, in W. Haymaker (ed.), The Founders of Neurology, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp. 64–67.
Petersen, S.E. and Fiez, J., 1993: The processing of single words studied with positron emission tomography, Annual Review of Neuroscience 16, 509–530.
Putnam, H., 1975: Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. II, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Radden, J., 1996: Lumps and bumps: Kantian faculty psychology, phrenology, and twentieth–century psychiatric classification, Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 3.1, 1–14.
Raichle, M.E., 2001: Functional neuroimaging: A historical and physiological perspective, in R. Cabeza and A. Kingstone (eds), Handbook of Functional Neuroimaging of Cognition, MIT Press/Bradford, Cambridge, MA, pp. 3–26.
Shallice, T., 1988: From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Shapiro, L., 2000: Multiple realizations, The Journal of Philosophy 97, 635–654.
Shepherd, G.M., 1994: Neurobiology, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
Singer, W., 1994: Putative functions of temporal correlations in neocortical processing, in C. Koch and J.L. Davis (eds), Large–Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain, MIT Press/Bradford, Cambridge, MA, pp. 201–237.
Uttal, W., 2001: The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain, MIT Press/Bradford, Cambridge, MA.
Zawidzki, T. and Bechtel, W. (in press): Fall's legacy revisited: decomposition and localization in cognitive neuroscience, in C.E. Erneling and D.M. Johnson (eds), Mind as a Scientific Object: Between Brain and Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Zola–Morgan, S., 1995: Localization of brain function: The legacy of Franz Joseph Gall (1758–1828), Annual Review of Neuroscience 18, 359–383.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mundale, J. Concepts of Localization: Balkanization in the Brain. Brain and Mind 3, 313–330 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022912227833
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022912227833