Skip to main content
Log in

Elementary categorial logic, predicates of variable degree, and theory of quantity

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing some suggestions of Ramsey (1925), elementary logic is formulated with respect to an arbitrary categorial system rather than the categorial system of Logical Atomism which is retained in standard elementary logic. Among the many types of non-standard categorial systems allowed by this formalism, it is argued that elementary logic with predicates of variable degree occupies a distinguished position, both for formal reasons and because of its potential value for application of formal logic to natural language and natural science. This is illustrated by use of such a logic to construct a theory of quantity which is argued to be scientifically superior to existing theories of quantity based on standard categorial systems, since it yields realvalued scales without the need for unrealistic existence assumptions. This provides empirical evidence for the hypothesis that the categorial structure of the physical world itself is non-standard in this sense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ArmstrongD.: 1978, Universals and Scientific Realism, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D.: 1983, What Is a Law of Nature?, Cambridge.

  • BalzerW., MoulinesC. U., and SneedJ.: 1987, An Architectonic for Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • BarwiseJ. and FefermanS. (eds.): 1985, Model-Theoretic Logics, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • vanBenthemJ.: 1982, ‘The Logical Study of Science’, Synthese 51 431–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • vanBenthemJ. and DoetsK.: 1983, ‘Higher-Order Logic’, in D.Gabbay and F.Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 1, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 275–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • vanBenthemJ.: 1986, ‘A Linguistic Turn: New Directions in Logic’, in R. BarcanMarcus et al. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VII, Elsevier Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChurchA.: 1956, Introduction to Mathematical Logic, vol. 1, Princeton U.P., Princeton, N. J.

    Google Scholar 

  • FregeG.: 1879, Begriffschrift, English translation in vanHeijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel, Harvard, Cambridge, 1967, 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrandyR.: 1976, ‘Anadic Logic and English’, Synthese 32, 395–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrandyR.: 1977, Advanced Logic for Applications, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • HenkinL.: 1950, ‘Completeness in the Theory of Types’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 15, 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • HölderO.: 1901, ‘Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass’, Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königliche Sachsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-Physische Klasse 53, 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • KrantzD., LuceR., SuppesP., and TverskyA.: 1971, Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MundyB.: 1986, ‘On the General Theory of Meaningful Representation’, Synthese 67, 391–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • MundyB.: 1987a, ‘The Metaphysics of Quantity’, Philosophical Studies 51, 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • MundyB.: 1987c, ‘Faithful Representation, Physical Extensive Measurement Theory and Archimedean Axioms’, Synthese 70, 373–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • MundyB.: 1987c, ‘Scientific Theory as Partially Interpreted Calculus’, Erkenntnis 27, 173–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • MundyB.: 1988a, ‘Extensive Measurement and Ratio Functions’, Synthese 75, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • MundyB.: 1988b, ‘Scientific Theory as Partially Interpreted Calculus II’ Erkenntnis 28, 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • RamseyF.: 1925, ‘Universals’, in The Foundations of Mathematics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1931, pp. 112–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • RamseyF.: 1926, ‘Note on the Preceding Paper’, in The Foundations of Mathematics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 135–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • RussellB.: 1918, ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, reprinted in Russell, B., Logic and Knowledge (MarshR. C. (ed.)), Allen and Unwin, London, 1956, 177–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • ScottD. and SuppesP.: 1958, ‘Foundational Aspects of Theories of Measurement’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 23, 113–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • SneedJ. D.: 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics; second revised edition, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • TarskiA.: 1951, A Decision Method for Elementary Alegebra and Geometry, U. of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • TarskiA.: 1959, ‘What Is Elementary Geometry?’, in HenkinL., SuppesP., and TarskiA. (eds.), The Axiomatic Method, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • UrmsonJ. O.: 1956, Philosophical Analysis, Oxford U.P., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • WarnockG. J.: 1958, English Philosophy Since 1900, Oxford U.P., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank my collegue Mark Brown and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mundy, B. Elementary categorial logic, predicates of variable degree, and theory of quantity. J Philos Logic 18, 115–140 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293444

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293444

Keywords

Navigation