Abstract
This paper examines some aspects of the grammar of measurement based on data from non-split and split measure phrase (MP) constructions in Japanese. I claim that the non-split MP construction involves measurement of individuals, while the split MP construction involves measurement of events as well as of individuals. This claim is based on the observation that, while both constructions are subject to some semantic restrictions in the nominal domain, only the split MP construction is sensitive to restrictions in the verbal domain (namely, incompatibility with single-occurrence events and with individual-level predicates, and (un)availability of collective readings). It is shown that these semantic restrictions can be explained by a uniform semantic constraint on the measure function, namely, Schwarzschild’s [(2002). The grammar of measurement. The Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistics Theory, 24, 241–306] monotonicity constraint. In particular, I argue that, in the two constructions at issue, the measure function is subject to the monotonicity constraint, and that we observe different semantic restrictions depending on whether the measure function applies to a nominal or a verbal domain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abney S. (1987). The english noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Bach E. (1986). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5-16
Beaver D., Crady B. (2003). Always and only: Why not all focus-sensitive operators are alike. Natural Language Semantics 11, 323-362
Bennett M., Partee B. (1972). Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English. Santa Monica, System Development Corporation
Borer H. (2005). Structuring sense, volume 1: In name only. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Bunt C.H. (1985). Mass terms and model theoretic semantics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Carlson G. (1977). Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Carlson G. (1984). On the role of thematic roles in linguistic theory. Linguistics 22, 259-279
Cartwright H. (1975). Amount and measures of amounts. Noûs 9, 143-164
Chierchia G. (1995). Individual-level predicates as inherent generics. In: Carlson G., Pelletier F.J. (eds) The generic book. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 176-223
Chierchia G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339-405
Davidson D. (1967). The logical form of action sentences. In: Rescher N. (eds) The logic of decision and action. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 81-95
Diesing M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Doetjes J. (1997). Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. Hague, Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics
Downing P. (1996). Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese. Amsterdam, John Benjamins
Dowty D. (1987). Collective predicates, distributive predicates, and all. The Proceedings of Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL) ’86, 97-115
Dowty D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(2): 547-619
Fujita N. (1994). On the nature of modification: A study of floating quantifiers and related constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester.
Fukushima K. (1991). Generalized floating quantifiers. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.
Harada S. (1976). Quantifier float as a relational rule. Metropolitan Linguistics 1, 44-49
Herburger E. (2000). What counts: Focus and quantification. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Inoue K. (1978). Nihongo-no Bunpoo Kisoku [Grammar Rules in Japanese]. Tokyo, Taisyukan
Ishii Y. (1999). A note on floating quantifiers in Japanese. In: Muraki M., Iwamoto E. (eds), Linguistics: In search of the human mind, A Festschrift for Kazuko Inoue. Tokyo, Kaitakusha, pp. 236-267
Jackendoff R. (1977). X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MIT Press
Jackendoff R. (1996). The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistics Theory 14, 305-354
Kitagawa Y., Kuroda S.-Y. (1992). Passive in Japanese. Manuscript. University of Rochester and University of California, San Diego
Kobuchi-Philip M. (2003). Distributivity and the Japanese Floating Numeral Quantifier. Ph.D. dissertation, The City University of New York.
Koizumi M. (1994). Secondary predicates. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3, 25-79
Kratzer A. (1995). Stage-level predicates and individual-level predicates. In: Carlson G., Pelletier F.J. (eds), The generic book. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 125-175
Kratzer A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In: Rooryck J., Zaring L. (eds), Phrase structure and the lexicon. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 109-137
Kratzer A. (forthcoming). The event argument Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Krifka M. (1986). Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Munich.
Krifka M. (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In: Bartsch R., van Benthem J., van Emde Boas P. (eds), Semantics and contextual expression. Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 75-115
Krifka M. (1990). Four thousand ships passed through the lock: Object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 487-520
Krifka M. (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In: Sag I.A., Szabolcsi A. (eds), Lexical matters. Stanford CA, CSLI, pp. 29-53
Krifka M. (1998). The origin of telicity. In: Rothstein S. (eds), Events and grammar. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 197-235
Kuno S. (1978). Theoretical perspectives on Japanese linguistics. In: Hinds J, Howard I. (eds) Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics. Tokyo, Kaitakusha
Landman F. (1989a). Groups I. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559-605
Landman F. (1989b). Groups II. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 723-744
Landman F. (1996). Plurality. In: Lappin S. (eds) Handbook of contemporary semantics. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 425- 457
Landman F. (2000). Events and plurality. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Lasersohn P. (1988). A semantics for groups and events. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
Lasersohn P. (1995). Plurality, conjunction and events. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Link G. (1983). The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice theoretic approach. In: Bauerle R., Schwarze C., von Stechow A. (eds) Meaning, use and interpretation of language. Berlin, de Gruyer, pp. 302-323
Marantz A. (1984). On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
ter Meulen A. (1984). Events, quantities and individuals. In: Landman F., Veltman F. (eds), Varieties of formal semantics. Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 259-280
Mihara K. (1998). Suuryoosi renketu koobun-to ’kekka’-no gan’i [Quantifier linking construction and the implication of ’resultative’]. Gengo [Language], 6, 86-95, 7, 94-102, 8, 104-113
Miyagawa S. (1989). Structure and case marking in Japanese. New York, Academic Press
Nakanishi K. (2004a). Domains of measurement: Formal properties of non-split/split quantifier constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Nakanishi K. (2004b). On comparative quantification in the verbal domain. The Proceedings of the 14th Semantics and Linguistics Theory (SALT 14). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Nakanishi K. (2007). Formal properties of measurement constructions. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter
Nakanishi K. (in press). The syntax and semantics of floating numeral quantifiers. In S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (Eds.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nakanishi K. & Romero M. (2004). Two constructions with most and their semantic properties. The Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 34) (pp. 453-467).
Nishigauchi T., & Uchibori A. (1991). Japanese bare NPs and syntax-semantics correspondences in quantification. Manuscript. Osaka University and University of Connecticut.
Ogihara T. (1998). The ambiguity of the -te iru form in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7, 87-120
Ohki M. (1987). Nihongo-no yuuru suuryoosi-no danwa kinoo-ni tuite [On discourse functions of floating quantifiers in Japanese]. Sityookaku Gaikokugokyooiku Kenkyuu 10, 37-68
Okutsu K. (1969). Suuryooteki-hyoogen-no bumpoo [the grammar of quantificational expressions]. Nihongo Kyooiku [Japanese Language Education] 14, 42-60
Parsons T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Partee B. (1987). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In: Groenendijk J., de Jongh D., Stokhof M. (eds) Studies in discourse representation theory and the Theory of generalized quantifiers. Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 115-143
Partee B., ter Meulen A., Wall R. (1990). Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Quine W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Rothstein S. (2004). Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford, Blackwell
Saito M., Murasugi K. (1999). Subject predication within IP and NP. In: Johnson K., Roberts I. (eds) Beyond principles and parameters. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 167-188
Schwarzschild R. (1991). On the meaning of definite plural noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Schwarzschild R. (1996). Pluralities. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Schwarzschild R. (2002). The grammar of measurement. The Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistics Theory XII, 225-245
Schwarzschild R., Wilkinson K. (2002). Quantifiers in comparatives: A semantics of degree based on intervals. Natural Language Semantics 10(1): 1-41
Shibatani M. (1977). Grammatical relations and surface cases. Language 53, 789-809
Sternefeld W. (1998). Reciprocity and cumulative predication. Natural Language Semantics 6, 303-337
Tenny C. (1987). Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Tenny C. (1994). Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Terada M. (1990). Incorporation and argument structure in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Verkuyl H. (1972). On the compositional nature of the aspects. Dordrecht, Reidel
Verkuyl H. (1993). A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Watanabe A. (2006). Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers. Natural Language and Linguistics Theory 24, 241-306
Williams E. (1981). Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1, 81-114
Zucchi S., White M. (2002). Twigs, sequences and the temporal constitution of predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 24(2): 223-270
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakanishi, K. Measurement in the nominal and verbal domains. Linguist and Philos 30, 235–276 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-007-9016-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-007-9016-8