Skip to main content
Log in

Replication without replicators

Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to a once influential view of selection, it consists of repeated cycles of replication and interaction. It has been argued that this view is wrong: replication is not necessary for evolution by natural selection. I analyze the nine most influential arguments for this claim and defend the replication–interaction conception of selection against these objections. In order to do so, however, the replication–interaction conception of selection needs to be modified significantly. My proposal is that replication is not the copying of an entity, the replicator, but the copying of a property. Thus, we can have a replication process without there being a replicator that is being copied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariew A., Lewontin R. (2004) The confusions of fitness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 347–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong D. M. (1961) Perception and the physical world. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong D. M. (1997) A World of states of affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aunger, R. (eds) (2000) Darwinizing culture. The status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunger R. (2002) The electric meme: A new theory of how we think and communivate. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Avital E., Jablonka E. (2000) Animal traditions: Behavioural inheritance in evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore S. (1999) The meme machine. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Blute M. (2007) The evolution of replication. Biological Theory 2: 10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard F. (2008) Causal processes, fitness and the differential persistence of lineages. Philosophy of Science 75: 560–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard F., Rosenberg A. (2004) Fitness, probability and the principles of natural selection. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 693–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon R.N. (1982) Levels of selection. Proceedings of the Philosophical Science Association, 1: 315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon R. N. (1988) Levels of selection: A hierarchy of interactors. In: Plotkin H. C. (eds) The role of behavior in evolution. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon R. N. (1990) Adaptation and environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon R.N. (1996) Concepts and methods in evolutionary biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon R. N. (2006) The principle of drift: Biology’s first law. Journal of Philosophy 102: 319–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman F. (2002) Lateral DNA transfer: Mechanisms and consequences. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Feldman M. W. (1981) Cultural transition and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. (1993) Sensory qualities. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. (2000) A theory of sentience. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, T. (forthcoming). Causation and determinable properties: On the efficacy of colour, shape and size. In: J. Kallestrup & J. Howhy (Eds.), Being reduced. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Davidson D. (1993) Thinking causes. In: Heil J., Mele A. (eds) Mental causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976/1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Dawkins R. (1982a) The extended phenotype. W. H. Freeman, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1982b). Replicators and vehicles. (Reprinted in Genes, organisms, populations: Controversies over the units of selection, by R. N. Brandon & R. M. Burian, Eds., 1984, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.)

  • Dawkins R. (1983) Universal Darwinism. In: Bendall D. S. (eds) Evolution from molecules to man. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 403–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D. C. (1995) Dangerous idea. Touchstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D. C. (2003) Freedom evolves. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D. C. (2006) Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Distin K. (2005) The selfish meme. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske F. (1989) Reasons and causes. Philosophical Perspectives 3: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler J. (1986) Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fracchia J., Lewontin R. (1999) Does culture evolve?. History and Theory 38: 52–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funkhouser E. (2006) The determinable–determinate relation. Nous 40: 548–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett C., Rives B. (2005) The non-existence of determinables: Or, a World of absolute determinates as default hypothesis. Nous 39: 483–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P. (2000) The replicator in retrospect. Biology and Philosophy 15: 403–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P. (2007) Conditions for evolution by natural selection. Journal of Philosophy 104: 489–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P. (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S. J. (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer J. (1998) The case for epigenetic inheritance in evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11: 193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer J. (2000) The units of evolutionary transition. Selection 1: 67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer J. (2002) What is ‘epi’ about epigenetics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 981: 97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer J. (2005) The informational gene and the substantial body: On the generalization of evolutionary theory by abstraction. In: Martin R. J., Cartwright N. (eds) Idealization XII: Correcting the model idealization and abstraction in the sciences. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 59–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths P., Gray R. (1994) Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. Journal of Philosophy 91: 277–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths P. E., Gray R. D. (1997) Replicator II: Judgement day. Biology and Philosophy 12: 471–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper J. L. (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil J., Mele A. (1993) Mental causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D. L. (1980) Individuality and selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull D. L. (1981) Units of evolution: A metaphysical essay. In: Jensen U. J., Harré R. (eds) The philosophy of evolution. Harvester Press, Brighton, pp 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D. L. (1988) Science as process. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D. L. (2001) Science and selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D. L., Langman R. E., Glenn S. S. (2001) A general account of selection: Biology, immunology and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 511–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E., Lamb M. J. (1995) Epigenetic inheritance and evolution: The Lamarckian dimension. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. B. C., Buss, L. W., Cook, R. E. (eds) (1985) Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J. B. C., Coates A. G. (1986) Life cycles and evolution of clonal (modular) animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 313: 7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson W. E. (1921) Logic part I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (1993) Can supervienience and ‘non-strict laws’ save anomalous monism?. In: Heil J., Mele A. (eds) Mental causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence J. G. (2002) Gene transfer in bacteria: Speciation without species. Theoretical Population Biology 61: 449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R. (1970) The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (1980). Adaptation. (Reprinted in The dialectical biologist, pp. 65–84, by R. Levins & R. Lewontin, Eds., 1985, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.)

  • Lewontin R. (1991) Biology as ideology. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd E. (2001) Units and levels of selection. In: Singh R. S., Krimbas C. B., Paul D. B., Beatty J. (eds) Thinking about evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 267–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden C. J., Wilson E. O. (1981) Genes, mind and culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthen M., Ariew A. (2002) Two ways of thinking about fitness and natural selection. Journal of Philosophy 49: 53–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1987) How to model evolution. In: Dupré J. A. (eds) The latest on the best. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J., Szathmary E. (1995) The major transitions in evolution. W.H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. (1978) Evolution. Scientific American 239: 46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. (1982) The growth of biological thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. (1991) One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. (2001) What evolution is. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin B. P. (1993) On Davidson’s response to the charge of epiphenomenalism. In: Heil J., Mele A. (eds) Mental causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor D. H. (1995) The facts of causation. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michod R. E. (1999) Darwinian dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Millstein R. (2006) Natural selection as a population-level causal process. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 627–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau T. A., Fox C. W. (1998) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanay B. (2001) A more pluralist typology of selection processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 547–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanay B. (2002) The return of the replicator: What is philosophically significant in a general account of replication and selection?. Biology and Philosophy 17: 109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanay B. (2005) Can cumulative selection explain adaptation?. Philosophy of Science 72: 1099–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanay B. (2009a) The properties of singular causation. The Monist 92: 113–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanay B. (2009b) Imagining, recognizing and discriminating. The ability hypothesis reconsidered. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79: 699–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanay, B. (forthcoming). Population thinking as trope nominalism. Synthese.

  • Neander K. (1995) Pruning the tree of life. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46: 59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S. (2007) Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley M. A., Dupré J. (2007) Size doesn’t matter: Towards a more inclusive philosophy of biology. Biology and Philosophy 22: 155–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., Gray, R. (eds) (2001) Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson P. J., Boyd R. (2005) Not by genes alone. How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M. (1996) Evolution, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, D. The properties of mental causation. Philosophical Quarterly, 47, 178–194.

  • Rosenberg A., Bouchard F. (2005) Matthen and Ariew’s obituary to fitness: Reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated. Biology and Philosophy 20: 343–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. (1984) The nature of selection. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa E. (1993) Davidson’s thinking causes. In: Heil J., Mele A. (eds) Mental causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D. (1996) Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D. (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Aunger R. (eds) Darwinizing culture the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens C. (2004) Selection, drift, and the “forces” of evolution. Philosophy of Science 71: 550–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K. (2006a) The evolution and evolvability of culture. Mind & Language 21: 137–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K. (2006b) Memes revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 145–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K., & Kitcher, P. (1988). The return of the gene. (Reprinted in Sterelny 2001, pp. 29–52.)

  • Sterelny K., Smith K., Dickison M. (1996) The extended replicator. Biology and Philosophy 11: 377–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szathmary Eors (2000) The Evolution of Replicators. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 355: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C. M., Nielsen K. M. (2005) Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria. National Review of Microbiology 3: 711–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uller T. (2008) Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 432–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba E. (1984) What is species selection?. Systematic Zoology 33: 263–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh D. M., Lewens T., Ariew A. (2002) The trials of life: Natural selection and random drift. Philosophy of Science 69: 429–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams G. C. (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams G. C. (1992) Natural selection: Domains, levels, challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt W. C. (1999) Genes, memes, and cultural heredity. Biology and Philosophy 14: 279–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yablo S. (1992) Mental causation. Philosophical Review 101: 245–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bence Nanay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nanay, B. Replication without replicators. Synthese 179, 455–477 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9702-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9702-x

Keywords

Navigation