Skip to main content
Log in

Continuants and Processes in Macroscopic Chemistry

  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemistry deals with substances and their transformations. School chemistry provides a picture of this in terms of small balls called atoms and ball-and-stick structures called molecules which, despite its crudity, has been taken to justifiably reflect a reductionist conception of macroscopic concepts like the chemical substances and chemical reactions. But with the recent interest in chemistry within the philosophy of science, an extensive and determined criticism has developed of the idea that the macroscopic world has been, or is likely to be, reduced to microscopic theory. From this perspective, it is of interest to see macroscopic ontology treated autonomously. I try to take a first few steps towards spelling this out. It involves recognising entities falling into two broad categories: continuants-things which can have different properties at different times — and processes — things whose temporal parts may have different features, but which themselves stand in contrast to continuants in this respect. The character of each and their interrelations depends on their mereological structure of parts, the exploration of which is one of the prime purposes of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Cartwright, Helen Moris: 1970. ‘Quantities’, Philosophical Review 79, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Helen Moris: 1975. ‘Amounts and Measures of Amounts’, Noûs 9, 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denbigh, Kenneth: 1981. The Principles of Chemical Equilibrium, 4th. edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, Fred: 1967. ‘Can Events Move?’, Mind 76, 479–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, Pierre: 1892. ‘Notation atomique et hypothèses atomistiques’, Revue des questions scientifiques 31, 391–457. Translated by Paul Needham as ‘Atomic Notation and Atomistic Hypotheses’, Foundations of Chemistry 2 (2000), 127-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, Pierre: 1895. ‘Les Théories de la Chaleur: I. Les Précurseurs de la Thermodynamique’, Revue des deux mondes 129, 869–901. Translated in Mixture and Chemical Combination, and Related Essays, trans. and ed. by Paul Needham, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002; pp. 121-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W.E.: 1921. Logic, Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip: 1984. ‘1953 and All That. A Tale of Two Sciences’, Philosophical Review 93, 335–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, James: 2002. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, H. and Nelson Goodman: 1940. ‘The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Ernest: 1961. The Structure of Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Paul: 1981. ‘Temporal Intervals and Temporal Order’, Logique et Analyse 93, 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Paul: 1999. ‘Macroscopic Processes’, Philosophy of Science 66, 310–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Paul: 2000. ‘Hot Stuff’, in Jan Faye, Uwe Scheffler and Max Urchs (eds.), Facts, Things, Events, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Vol. 76. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 421–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Paul: 2003. ‘Chemical Substances and Intensive Properties’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 988, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Peter: 1983. ‘Semantics for Mass Terms With Quantifiers’, Noûs 17, 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: 1937. The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd. edn. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, Eric and Lee McIntyre: 1997. ‘The Case for the Philosophy of Chemistry’, Synthese 111, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, Johanna: 2000. ‘The Dynamic Constitution of Things’, in Jan Faye, Uwe Scheffler and Max Urchs (eds.), Facts, Things, Events, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Vol. 76. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 241–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, Johanna: 2001. ‘Formal Process Ontology’, in C. Welty and B. Smith (eds.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Collected Papers From the Second International Conference. Ogunquit: ACM Press, pp. 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Peter: 2000. ‘Continuants and Occurrents’, Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 74, 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, Alfred: 1983. ‘Foundations of the Geometry of Solids’, trans. of original 1926 article in Logic, Semantics and Metamathematics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing company.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Brakel, Jaap: 2000. Philosophy of Chemistry: Between the Manifest and the Scientific Image. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vemulapalli, G.K. and Henry Byerly: 1999. ‘Remnants of Reductionism’, Foundations of Chemistry 1, 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Needham, P. Continuants and Processes in Macroscopic Chemistry. Axiomathes 14, 237–265 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AXIO.0000006795.99588.93

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AXIO.0000006795.99588.93

Keywords

Navigation