Skip to main content
Log in

Irrelevant Alternatives and Frankfurt Counterfactuals

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In rejecting the Principle of AlternatePossibilities (PAP), Harry Frankfurt makes useof a special sort of counterfactual of thefollowing form: ``he wouldn't have doneotherwise even if he could have''. Recently,other philosophers (e.g., Susan Hurley (1999,2003) and Michael Zimmerman (2002)) haveappealed to a special class of counterfactualsof this same general form in defending thecompatibility of determinism andresponsibility. In particular, they claim thatit can be true of agents that even if they aredetermined, and so cannot do otherwise, theywouldn't have done otherwise even if they couldhave. Using as a central case an argument ofSusan Hurley's, I point out that thecounterfactuals in question are both``interlegal'' and ``indeterministic'', and I raisedoubts about whether this special class ofcounterfactuals have clear truth conditions. Finally I suggest that acknowledging thesepoints leads to an appreciation of the realstrength of Frankfurt-style examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, R.M. (1977): "Middle Knowledge and the Problem of Evil', American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R.M. (1985): "Plantinga on the Problem of Evil', Alvin Plantinga (pp. 225–255), Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J.M. (1994): The Metaphysics of Free Will, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J.M. (1999): "Recent Work on Moral Responsibility', Ethics 110, 93–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J.M. (2002): "Frankfurt-type Examples and Semi-compatibilism', in R. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will (pp. 281–308), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J.M. and Ravizza, M. (1998): Responsibility and Control, A Theory of Moral Responsibility, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1969/1988): "Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility', reprinted in The Importance of What We Care About, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1988): The Importance of What We Care About, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, S. (2003): Justice, Luck, and Knowledge, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, S. (1999): "Responsibility, Reasons, and Irrelevant Alternatives', Philosophy and Public Affairs 28, 205–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. (1985): Free Will and Values, Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. (1996): The Significance of Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1973): Counterfactuals, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1986): Philosophical Papers, Volume II, Oxford University Press.

  • Maudlin, T. (forthcoming): "A Modest Proposal Concerning Laws, Counterfac-tuals, and Explanations', in The Metaphysics Within Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • McKenna, M. (2003): "Robustness, Control, and the Demand for Morally Significant Alternatives: Frankfurt Examples with Oodles and Oodles of Alternatives', in D. Widerker and M. McKenna (2003).

  • Mele, A. and Robb, D. (1998): "Rescuing Frankfurt-style Cases', The Philosoph-ical Review 107, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A. and Robb, D. (2003): "Bbs, Magnets, and Seesaws: The Metaphysics of Frankfurt-style Cases', in D. Widerker and M. McKenna (2003).

  • Mermin, D. (1989): "Can You Help Your Team by Watching on TV? More Experi-mental Metaphysics from Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen', in J.T. Cushing and E. McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem, South Bend: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, M. (1984): "Frankfurt on the Principle of Alternate Possibilities', Philosophical Studies 46, 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. (in preparation): "How to Argue Against the Leeway Incompatibilist."

  • Otsuka, M. (1998): "Incompatibilism and the Avoidability of Blame', Ethics 108, 685–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereboom, D. (2001): Living Without Free Will, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. (1974): The Nature of Necessity, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. (1985): "Replies', Alvin Plantinga (pp. 225–255), Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, M. (1987): Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widerker, D. (1995): "Libertarianism and Frankfurt's Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities', The Philosophical Review 104, 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widerker, D. and McKenna, M. (eds.) (2003): Moral Responsibility and Alternate Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternate Possibilities, Burlington: Ashgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. (2002): "Taking Luck Seriously', The Journal of Philosophy 99, 553–576.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelkin, D.K. Irrelevant Alternatives and Frankfurt Counterfactuals. Philosophical Studies 121, 1–25 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000040372.79054.a2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000040372.79054.a2

Navigation