Skip to main content
Log in

The Two Pratyabhijñā Theories of Error

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this essay, it is argued that Abhinavagupta’s theory of error, the apūrṇakhyāti theory, synthesizes two distinguishable Pratyabhijñā treatments of error that were developed in three phases prior to him. The first theory was developed in two stages, initially by Somānanda in the Śivadṛṣṭi (ŚD) and subsequently by Utpaladeva in his Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikās (ĪPK) and his short autocommentary thereon, the Īśvarapratyabhijñāvṛtti (ĪPVṛ). This theory served to explain individual acts of misperception, and it was developed with the philosophy of the Buddhist epistemologists in mind. In a third phase, Utpaladeva developed in his Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti (ŚDVṛ) a second theory of error, one that involved the noncognition of non-duality (abhedākhyāti) and served to explain both the appearance and perception of multiplicity, despite the strict monism to which all Pratyabhijñā authors subscribe. Abhinavagupta’s treatment of error, then, is significant not only because it was meant to explain all the various theories of error offered by opposing philosophical schools, as Rastogi has shown, but more importantly because it synthesized the thinking of his predecessors on the matter in a single, elegant account of error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Manuscript Sources

  • Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda. (T) Trivandrum University, number 5854-H.

  • Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda. (C) Calcutta Sanskrit College, CS 3, 153.

  • Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda, along with the Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti of Utpaladeva. (G) Göttingen, Niedersächsische Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek, Cod.Ms.Sanscr.Vish 5 (11).

  • Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda, along with the Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti of Utpaladeva. (J) Raghunāth Mandir Library, Jammu.

  • Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda, along with the Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti of Utpaladeva. (P) Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Pune, number: 805 of 1891-95.

  • Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda, along with the Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti of Utpaladeva. (R) Rajasthan Oriental Research Institute, Jodhpur.

Primary Sources

  • Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā (ĪPK) of Utpaladeva. Ed. and Trans. by Raffaele Torella. 1994. The Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā of Utpaladeva with the Author’s Vṛtti: Critical Edition and Annotated Translation. Roma: IsMEO.

  • Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikāvṛtti (ĪPVṛ) of Utpaladeva. See Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā.

  • Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī (ĪPV) of Abhinavagupta. Ed. by Madhusudan Kaul Shāstrī. 1918–1921. The Īśvarapratyabhijñā of Utpaladeva with the Vimarśinī by Abhinavagupta. KSTS 22 and 23. Pune: Aryabhushan Press.

  • Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛtivimarśinī (ĪPVV) of Abhinavagupta. Ed. by Pt. Madhusūdan Kaul Shāstrī. 1938, 1941, and 1943. The Īśvarapratyabhijñā Vivṛtivimarśinī by Abhinavagupta. 3 Vols. KSTS 60, 62 and 65. Pune: Aryabhushan Press.

  • Nyāyabindu of Dharmakīrti. 1954. Nyāyabinduḥ Śrīdharmottarācāryakṛ taṭikāsametaḥ. Ed. by Śrī Candraśekhara Śāstri. Śrī Kāśī Saṃskṛtagranthamālā 22. Vāraṇasī: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Book-Depot.

  • Śivadṛṣṭi (ŚD = Ked.) of Somānanda. 1934. The Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānandanātha with the Vṛtti by Utpaladeva. Ed. by Madhusudan Kaul Shastri. KSTS 54. Pune: Aryabhushan Press.

  • Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti (ŚDVṛ) of Utpaladeva. See Śivadṛṣṭi.

Secondary Sources

  • Bandyopadhyay N. (1988) The concept of contradiction in Indian philosophy. Journal of Indian Philosophy 16(3): 225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus G. (1997) Recognizing reality: Dharmakīrti’s philosophy and its Tibetan interpretations. SUNY Press, Albany, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne J.D. (2004) Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s philosophy. Wisdom Publications, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne J.D. (2006) Realizing the unreal: Dharmakīrti’s theory of yogic perception. Journal of Indian Philosophy 34(5): 497–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco E. (1986) Once again on Dharmakīrti’s deviation from Dignāga on Pratyakṣābhāsa. Journal of Indian Philosophy 14: 79–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco E. (1993) Did Dignāga accept four types of perception?. Journal of Indian Philosophy 21(3): 295–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnoli R. (1957) Śivadṛṣṭi by Somānanda: Translation and commentary, chapter I. East and West 8: 16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattori, M. (1968). Dignāga: On perception, being the Pratyakṣapariccheda of Dignāga’s Pramāṇasamuccaya. Harvard Oriental Series 47. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Hayes R. (1997) Whose experience validates what for Dharmakīrti?. In: Bilimoria P., Mohanty J.N. (eds) Relativism, suffering, and beyond: Essays in memory of Bimal K. Matilal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsura S. (1984) Dharmakīrti’s theory of truth. Journal of Indian Philosophy 12: 215–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, B. (1997). Types of incompatibility (’Gal ba) and types of noncognition (Ma/Mi Dmigs) in early Tibetan Tshad Ma literature. In H. Krasser, M. T. Much, E. Steinkellner, & H. Tauscher (Eds.), Tibetan studies: Proceedings of the 7th seminar of the international association of Tibetan studies, Graz, 1995 (Vol. 1, pp. 495–510). Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Kyuma, T. (1997). Bheda and Virodha. In S. Katsura (Ed.), Dharmakīrti’s thought and its impact on Indian and Tibetan philosophy: Proceedings of the third international Dharmakīrti conference, Hiroshima, Nov 4–6, 1997 (pp. 225–232). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Mikogami E. (1979) Some remarks on the concept of Arthakriyā. Journal of Indian Philosophy 7: 79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagatomi, M. (1967–1968). Arthakriyā. The Adyar Library Bulletin, 31–32, 52–72.

  • Nemec, J. (forthcoming). The Ubiquitous Śiva: Somānanda’s Śivadṛṣṭi and his tanric interlocutors. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Pandey K.C. (1963/2000) Abhinavagupta: An historical and philosophical study (2nd ed). Varanasi, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi N. (1986) Theory of error according to Abhinavagupta. Journal of Indian Philosophy 14(1): 1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratié I. (2007) Otherness in the Pratyabhijñā philosophy. Journal of Indian Philosophy 35(4): 313–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson A. (1990) The visualization of the deities of the Trika. In: Padoux A. (eds) L’Image divine: Culte et meditation dans l’hinduisme. Éditions du CNRS, Paris, pp 31–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Stcherbatsky, T. (1932/1993). Buddhist logic, 2 Vols, 1st Indian edition. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Torella R. (1992) The Pratyabhijñā and the logical-epistemological school of Buddhism. In: Goudriaan T. (eds) Ritual and speculation in early tantrism: Studies in honor of André Padoux. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 327–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Torella, R. (2007a). Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛti. Part I. Apoha and anupalabdhi in a Shaiva Garb. In K. Preisendanz (Ed.), Expanding and merging horizons: Contributions to South Asian and cross-cultural studies in commemoration of Wilhelm Halbfass (pp. 473–490). Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.

  • Torella, R. (2007b). Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛti. Part II. What is memory. In B. Kellner, et al. (Eds.), Indica et Tibetica: Festschrift für Michael Hahn Zum 65. Geburtstag von Freunden und Schülern überreicht (pp. 539–563). Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.

  • Torella, R. (2007c). Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛti. Part III. Can a cognition become the object of another cognition? In D. Goodall & A. Padoux (Eds.), Mélanges tantriques à la mémoire d’Hélène Brunner (pp. 475–484). Pondicherry: Institut Française de Pondichéry / École Française d’Extrême-Orient.

  • Torella, R. (2007d). Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛti. Part IV. Light of the subject-light of the object. In B. Kellner, et al. (Eds.), Pramanakirtih. papers dedicated to Ernst Steinkellner on the occasion of his 70th birthday (Vol. 2, pp. 925–939). Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.

  • Torella, R. (2008). From an adversary to the Main Ally: The place of Bhartṛhari in the Kashmirian Shaiva Advaita. In M. Kaul & A. Aklujkar (Eds.), Linguistic traditions of Kashmir: Essays in memory of Pandit Dinanath Yaksh (pp. 508–524). New Delhi: D. K. Printworld.

  • Torella, R. (forthcoming). Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivṛti. Part V: Selfawareness and yogic perception.

  • Woo J. (2003) Dharmakīrti and his commentators on Yogipratyakṣa. Journal of Indian Philosophy 31(5): 439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Nemec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nemec, J. The Two Pratyabhijñā Theories of Error. J Indian Philos 40, 225–257 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-011-9130-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-011-9130-3

Keywords

Navigation