Skip to main content
Log in

Abstraction via generic modeling in concept formation in science

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cases where analogy has played a significant role in the formation of a new scientific concept are well-documented. Yet, how is it that genuinely new representations can be constructed from existing representations? It is argued that the process of ‘generic modeling’ enables abstraction of features common to both the domain of the source of the analogy and of the target phenomena. The analysis focuses on James Clerk Maxwell's construction of the electromagnetic field concept. The mathematical representation Maxwell constructed turned out to be a system of abstract laws that when applied to electromagnetic systems yield laws of a dynamical system that will not map back onto the mechanicals domains used in their construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Brown, H. (1986) Sellars, concepts, and conceptual change,Synthese, 68, pp. 275–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1989)Nature's capacities and their measurement (Oxford, Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. & Glaser, R. (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices,Cognitive Science, 5, pp. 121–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1989) Learning via model construction and criticism, in G. Glover, R. Ronning & C. Reynolds (Eds),Handbook of creativity: Assessment, theory, and research (New York, Plenum Publishers), pp. 341–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, L. & Cain, J.A. (1989) Selection type theories,Philosophy of Science, 56, pp. 106–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P. (1902)Les Théories électriques de J. Clerk Maxwell: Etude historique et critique (Paris, A. Hermann & Cie).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P. (1914)The aim and structure of physical theory; reprinted in 1962 (New York, Atheneum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraday, M. (1839–55)Experimental researches in electricity; reprinted in 1965 (New York, Dover).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N. (1988)Explaining science: A cognitive approach (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. (1974) Maxwell's logic of analogy, inThe structure of scientific inference (Berkeley, University of California Press), pp. 259–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A. (1978)Galileo studies (Atlantic Highlands NJ, Humanities Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.C. (1854) On the equilibrium of elastic solids, in W.D. Niven (Ed.),The scientific papers of J.C. Maxwell (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1890); reprinted in 1952 (New York, Dover), vol. 1, pp. 30–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.C. (1855–6) On Faraday's lines of force, inScientific papers, vol. 1, pp. 155–229.

  • Maxwell, J.C. (1861–2) On physical lines of force, inScientific papers, vol. 1, pp. 451–513.

  • Maxwell, J.C. (1864) A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field, inScientific papers, vol. 1, pp. 526–97.

  • Maxwell, J.C. (1873) Quarternions,Nature, 9, pp. 137–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.C. (1890) Thomson and Tait's natural philosophy, inScientific papers, vol. 2, pp. 776–85.

  • Maxwell, J.C. (1891)A treatise on electricity and magnetism, 3rd ed. (1st ed.: 1873) (Oxford, Clarendon Press): reprinted in 1954 (New York, Dover).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1984a)Faraday to Einstein: Constructing meaning in scientific theories (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1984b) Aether/or: The creation of scientific concepts,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 15, pp. 175–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1988) Reasoning from imagery and analogy in scientific concept formation, in A. Fine & J. Leplin (Eds),Psa 1988 (East Lansing MI,Psa), vol. 1, pp. 41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1992) How do scientists think?, in R. Giere (Ed.),Cognitive models of science (Minneapolis MN, University of Minnesota Press), pp. 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1995) Should physicists preach what they practice? Constructive modeling in doing and learning physics,Science and Education, 4, pp. 1203–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1954)Induction and analogy in mathematics, vol. 1 (Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1965) Scientific realism or irenic instrumentalism, in R. Cohen & M. Wartofsky (Eds),Boston studies in the philosophy of science 2 (Dordrecht, Reidel Publishing Company), pp. 171–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nersessian, N.J. Abstraction via generic modeling in concept formation in science. Mind & Society 3, 129–154 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511871

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511871

Keywords

Navigation