Abstract
Cases where analogy has played a significant role in the formation of a new scientific concept are well-documented. Yet, how is it that genuinely new representations can be constructed from existing representations? It is argued that the process of ‘generic modeling’ enables abstraction of features common to both the domain of the source of the analogy and of the target phenomena. The analysis focuses on James Clerk Maxwell's construction of the electromagnetic field concept. The mathematical representation Maxwell constructed turned out to be a system of abstract laws that when applied to electromagnetic systems yield laws of a dynamical system that will not map back onto the mechanicals domains used in their construction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Brown, H. (1986) Sellars, concepts, and conceptual change,Synthese, 68, pp. 275–307.
Cartwright, N. (1989)Nature's capacities and their measurement (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. & Glaser, R. (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices,Cognitive Science, 5, pp. 121–52.
Clement, J. (1989) Learning via model construction and criticism, in G. Glover, R. Ronning & C. Reynolds (Eds),Handbook of creativity: Assessment, theory, and research (New York, Plenum Publishers), pp. 341–81.
Darden, L. & Cain, J.A. (1989) Selection type theories,Philosophy of Science, 56, pp. 106–29.
Duhem, P. (1902)Les Théories électriques de J. Clerk Maxwell: Etude historique et critique (Paris, A. Hermann & Cie).
Duhem, P. (1914)The aim and structure of physical theory; reprinted in 1962 (New York, Atheneum).
Faraday, M. (1839–55)Experimental researches in electricity; reprinted in 1965 (New York, Dover).
Giere, R.N. (1988)Explaining science: A cognitive approach (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).
Hesse, M. (1974) Maxwell's logic of analogy, inThe structure of scientific inference (Berkeley, University of California Press), pp. 259–82.
Koyré, A. (1978)Galileo studies (Atlantic Highlands NJ, Humanities Press).
Maxwell, J.C. (1854) On the equilibrium of elastic solids, in W.D. Niven (Ed.),The scientific papers of J.C. Maxwell (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1890); reprinted in 1952 (New York, Dover), vol. 1, pp. 30–74.
Maxwell, J.C. (1855–6) On Faraday's lines of force, inScientific papers, vol. 1, pp. 155–229.
Maxwell, J.C. (1861–2) On physical lines of force, inScientific papers, vol. 1, pp. 451–513.
Maxwell, J.C. (1864) A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field, inScientific papers, vol. 1, pp. 526–97.
Maxwell, J.C. (1873) Quarternions,Nature, 9, pp. 137–8.
Maxwell, J.C. (1890) Thomson and Tait's natural philosophy, inScientific papers, vol. 2, pp. 776–85.
Maxwell, J.C. (1891)A treatise on electricity and magnetism, 3rd ed. (1st ed.: 1873) (Oxford, Clarendon Press): reprinted in 1954 (New York, Dover).
Nersessian, N.J. (1984a)Faraday to Einstein: Constructing meaning in scientific theories (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff).
Nersessian, N.J. (1984b) Aether/or: The creation of scientific concepts,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 15, pp. 175–218.
Nersessian, N.J. (1988) Reasoning from imagery and analogy in scientific concept formation, in A. Fine & J. Leplin (Eds),Psa 1988 (East Lansing MI,Psa), vol. 1, pp. 41–8.
Nersessian, N.J. (1992) How do scientists think?, in R. Giere (Ed.),Cognitive models of science (Minneapolis MN, University of Minnesota Press), pp. 3–44.
Nersessian, N.J. (1995) Should physicists preach what they practice? Constructive modeling in doing and learning physics,Science and Education, 4, pp. 1203–26.
Polya, G. (1954)Induction and analogy in mathematics, vol. 1 (Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press).
Sellars, W. (1965) Scientific realism or irenic instrumentalism, in R. Cohen & M. Wartofsky (Eds),Boston studies in the philosophy of science 2 (Dordrecht, Reidel Publishing Company), pp. 171–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nersessian, N.J. Abstraction via generic modeling in concept formation in science. Mind & Society 3, 129–154 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511871
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511871