Skip to main content
Log in

Epistemology Factualized: New Contractarian Foundations for Epistemology

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many epistemologists are interested in offering a positive account of how it is that many of our common sense beliefs enjoy one or another positive epistemological status (e.g., how they are warranted, justified, reasonable, or what have you). A number of philosophers, under the influence of Wittgenstein and/or J. L. Austin, have argued that this enterprise is misconceived. The most effective version of this argument is to be found in Mark Kaplan’s paper “Epistemology on Holiday”. After explaining what this criticism amounts to and why it is important, I then respond to it. My response is based upon, and is intended to display the explanatory power of, a contractarian account of our practice of epistemic appraisal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • William Alston (1985) ArticleTitle”Concepts of Epistemic Justification” The Monist 68 57–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, William: 1988, ”The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification” in Tomberlin 1988.

  • William. Alston (1993) ArticleTitle”Epistemic Desiderata” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 527–51 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2108079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Austin (1962) Sense and Sensibilia Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence BonJour (1985) The Structure of Empirical Justification Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Alex Byrne (2004) ArticleTitle‘How Hard Are Skeptical Paradoxes?’ Nous 38 299–325 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1468-0068.2004.00471.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley Cavell (1979) The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Roderick Chisholm (1976) Theory of Knowledge EditionNumber2 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson Clarke (1972) ArticleTitle‘The Legacy of Skepticism’ Journal of Philosophy 69 754–69 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2024672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Stewart: 1988, ‘How to be an Fallibilist’ in Tomberlin 1988.

  • Edward Craig (1990) Knowledge and the State of Nature Clarendon Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan Dancy (Eds) (1979) Papers on Language and Logic Keele University Library Keele

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1986. ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’ in LePore 1986.

  • Keith DeRose (1995) ArticleTitle‘Solving the Skeptical Problem’ Philosophical Review 104 1–51 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2186011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith DeRose (1996) ArticleTitle‘Knowledge, Assertion, and Lotteries’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 568–80 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00048409612347531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fred Dretske (1971) ArticleTitle‘Conclusive Reasons’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith DeRose (1981) Knowledge and the Flow of Information MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard Feldman Earl Conee (1985) ArticleTitle‘Evidentialism’ Philosophical Studies 48 15–34 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00372404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: 1980, The Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. J.L. Austin, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.

  • Peter French Theodore Uehling SuffixJr. Howard Wettstein (Eds) (1981) Midwest Studies in Philosophy VI: The Foundations of Analytic Epistemology University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1957, ‘Meaning’ in Grice 1989.

  • Grice (1989) Studies in the Way of Words Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvin Goldman (1986) Epistemology and Cognition Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • L. E. Hahn (Eds) (1998) The Philosophy of P.F. Strawson Open Court Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert Harman (1973) Thought Princeton University Press Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark Kaplan (1991) ArticleTitle‘Epistemology on Holiday’ Journal of Philosophy 88 132–54 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2026985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter Klein (1981) Certainty: A Refutation of Skepticism University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilary Kornblith (2002) Knowledge and its Place in Nature Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith Lehrer (1974) Knowledge Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith Lehrer (1990) Theory of Knowledge Westview Press Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • E. LePore (Eds) (1986) Truth and Interpretation Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • David Lewis (1979) ArticleTitle‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 339–59 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00258436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David Lewis (1995) ArticleTitle‘Elusive Knowledge’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 549–67 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00048409612347521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas Long (1992) ArticleTitle‘The Self-Defeating Character of Skepticism’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 67–84 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2107744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E.: 1959a, ‘Certainty’ in Moore 1959c.

  • Moore, G. E.: 1959b, ‘A Defence of Common Sense’ in Moore 1959c.

  • Moore, G. E.: 1959c, Philosophical Papers, George Allen and Unwin, London.

  • Nozick, Robert: 1981, Philosophical Explanations, Belknap, Cambridge, MA.

  • David Owens (2000) Reason without Freedom: The Problem of Epistemic Normativity Routledge London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvin Plantinga (1993a) Warrant: The Current Debate Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvin Plantinga (1993b) Warrant and Proper Function Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • John Pollock (1974) Knowledge and Justification Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilary Putnam (1981) Reason, Truth, and History Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven Rieber (1998) ArticleTitle‘Knowledge and Contrastive Explanation’ Nous 32 189–204 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0029-4624.00096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand Russell (1971) Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy Simon and Schuster New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, Michael: 1979, ‘Assertion and Belief’ in Dancy 1979.

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1998, ‘Reply to Ernest Sosa’ in Hahn 1998.

  • Barry Stroud (1984) The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry Stroud (2000) Understanding Human Knowledge Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • James Tomberlin (1988) Philosophical Perspectives, Volume 2: Epistemology Ridgeview Atascadero, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner Piers: Manuscript, ‘A Defense of Epistemic Deontology’, Master’s Thesis at the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill (2004).

  • Peter Unger (1975) Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan Vogel (1990) ArticleTitle‘Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation’ Journal of Philosophy 87 658–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard Williams (1978) Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry Hammondsworth London

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Williams (1977) Groundless Belief: An Essay on the Possibility of Epistemology Yale New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Williams (1991) Unnatural Doubts: Epistemololgical Realism and the Basis of Scepticism Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Timothy Williamson (2000) Knowledge and Its Limits Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig Wittgenstein (1969) On Certainty Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright Crispin: 1985, ‘Facts and Certainty’, Proceedings of the British Academy 429–72.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ram Neta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neta, R. Epistemology Factualized: New Contractarian Foundations for Epistemology. Synthese 150, 247–280 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6266-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6266-7

Keywords

Navigation