Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Investigation into Unethical Behavior Intentions Among Undergraduate Students: A Malaysian Study

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of the dimensions of the theory of planned behavior, gender and course majors on unethical behavior intentions among Generation Y undergraduates. The sample of this study comprises 245 undergraduates from a private higher education institution (PHEI) in Malaysia. The instrument of this study is developed based on concepts developed from extant literature. Reliability and validity is accessed using Cronbach’s Alpha and Exploratory Factor Analysis respectively. Social desirability bias was monitored utilizing concepts adapted from Phillips and Clancy (American Journal of Sociology, 77(5), 921–940, 1972). Multiple Linear Regression and Independent sample T-tests were used for hypotheses testing. As a whole, results indicate that egoism, utilitarianism and magnitude of consequences exerted significant influence on unethical behavior intentions. Peer influence was not significant. In terms of gender, unethical intentions among males were influenced by egoism and peer influenced while females by utilitarianism and magnitude of consequences. Business majors did not consider magnitude of consequences significant in unethical behavior intentions. Ethical values form the fundamentals of ethical culture within organizations and a business environment which is increasingly based on self-regulation. Ethics is an essential part of the holistic personal development of future business leaders. As such, by understanding ethical attitudes and perceptions, we can draw implications for the further enhancements of teaching and learning of Business Ethics in academia as well as the development of ethical culture in the Malaysian context. Educators, parents and society also need to realise their role in the ethical development of these future Malaysian leaders. The framework of this study could be extended to actual behaviors, adult samples and also account for religiosity and age. This study utilizes the established dimensions and framework of the Theory of Planned Behavior in bridging the gap of research in unethical behavior within the context of a PHEI in Malaysia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Rashid, M. Z., & Ho, J. A. (2003). Perception of business ethics in a multicultural community: the case of Malaysia. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, N. H., Ansari, N. A., & Aafaqi, R. (2005). Ethical reasoning: the impact of ethical dilemma, egoism and belief in just world. Asian Academy of Malaysian Journal, 10(2), 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, S. S., Ahmad, A., Ahmad, M. S., & Nik Hashim, N. M. H. (2011). An empirical study of an extended theory of planned behavior model for pirated software purchase. World Journal of Management, 3(1), 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, K. K., Salleh, R., & Sabdin, M. (2010). A study on the level of ethics at a Malaysian private higher learning institution: comparison between foundation and undergraduate technical-based students. International Journal of Basic and, Applied Statistics, 10(8), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned baheviour: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self–efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T. (2001). Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision making: an empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(5), 1038–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1994). Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(6), 469–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., Brown, G., & Bass, K. (1994). The ethical judgments of college students regarding business issues. The Journal of Education for Business, 69(6), 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, C. R., & Valentine, S. R. (2010). Investigating the effects of gender on consumers’ moral philosophies and ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltramini, R., Peterson, R., & Kozmetsky, G. (1984). Concerns of college students regarding business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 3, 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowes-Sperry, L., & Powell, G. N. (1999). Observers’ reactions to social-sexual behavior at work: an ethical decision making perspective. Journal of Management, 25(6), 779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, H. F. (2005). Ethical decision making in the public accounting profession: an extension of Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushe, S., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). Business ethics: where philosophy and ethics collide. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 3(2), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, K. D., Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organisations: influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7), 981–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carol, Y. Y. L. (1999). Business ethics in Taiwan: a comparison of company employees and university student. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 18(2), 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, S. E., Malmstorm, J. E., & West, J. E. (2007). Peer effects in academic cheating. Journal of Human Resource, 43(1), 173–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, L. T., Lung, C. K., & Ramly, Z. (2009). Exploring ethical orientation of future business leaders in Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Paper, 5(2), 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. Y. S., & Leung, P. (2006). The effects of accounting students’ ethical reasoning and personal factors on their sensitivity. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(4), 436–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M. K. (1998). Predicting unethical behavior: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1825–1834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Pan, C., & Pan, M. (2009). The joint moderating impact of moral intensity and moral judgment on consumer’s use intention of pirated software. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, C. K. (1999). Ethical judgment and ethical reasoning: a cross-lag model for university students in Hong Kong. College Studies Journal, 33(4), 515–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review of avenues for future research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. (2009). Business students cheat more often than others. The Badger Herald http://badgerherald.com/news/2009/02/11/study_business_stude.php. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Questioning the domain of the business ethics curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 10(1), 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, P. A., Gallicano, T., & Matthews, K. (2011). Millennials’ approaches to ethical decision making: a survey of young public relations agency employees. The Public Relations Journal, 5(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Astous, A., Colbert, F., & Montpetit, D. (2005). Music piracy on the web- how effective are anti-piracy arguments: evidence from the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debeljak, J., & Krkac, K. (2008). “Me, myself & I”: practical egoism, selfishness, self-interest and business ethics. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M. (2010). The consumer, politics and everyday life. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(3), 190–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dharan, B. G., & Bufkins, W. R. (2008). Red flags in Enron’s reporting of revenues & key financial measures, http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~bala/files/dharan-bufkins_enron_red_flags.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2012.

  • Dukerich, J. M., Waller, M. J., George, E., & Huber, G. P. (2000). Moral intensity and managerial problem solving. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(1), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M., & Schubert-Güler, P. (2006). Explaining counterfeit purchases: a review and preview. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2006, 1(1). http://search.proquest.com/docview/200799861?accountid=40355 Accessed 3 August 2012.

  • Elias, R. Z., & Faraj, M. (2010). The relationship between accounting students’ love for money and their ethical perception. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(3), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethics Resource Center (2010). 2009 National business ethics survey: Millennials, Gen X and Baby Boomers: who’s working at your company and what do they think about ethics? http://ethics.org/files/u5/Gen-Diff.pdf Accessed 15 April 2012.

  • Fieser, J. (2009). Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.iep.utm.edu/ethics/#SSH1b.i Accessed 8 May 2011.

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, B. L., & May, D. R. (2000). Environmental ethical decision making in the U.S. metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 642–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G. R., Crown, D. E., & Spake, D. E. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perception of business practices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. (2000). The impact of moral intensity on decision making in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K. (2002). Developing a framework for ethically questionable behavior in consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacomo, D. E., Brown, J., & Akers, M. D. (2011). Generational differences of personal values of business students. American Journal of Business Education, 4(9), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (2010). Is gender inclusivity an answer to ethical issue in business?: an Indian stance. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25(1), 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: the effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Journal of the Association of Psychological Science, 20(3), 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granitz, N., & Loewry, D. (2007). Applying ethical theories: interpreting and responding to student plagiarism. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J. L., & Sulaiman, M. (1996). Ethical orientations of managers in Malaysia. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 735–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). USA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S. (1997). A test of a person issue contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organisations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. E., & Kavanagh, M. J. (1996). An experimental examination of the effects of individual and situational factors on unethical behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 511–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, N. K., Kakabadse, A., & Kouzmin, A. (2002). Ethical considerations in management research: a ‘truth’ seeker’s guide. International Journal of Value–Based Management, 15(2), 105–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C. D. (1997). Varieties of egoism. http://webs.wofford.edu/kaycd/ethics/egoism.htm Accessed 8 May 2011.

  • Kevin, J. (2010). The scandal beneath the crisis: getting a view from a cultural-moral mental model. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 33(2), 735–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, J. (2002). A critique of “is business bluffing ethical?” Marketing Educators’ Association Conference, 21st April 2002, San Diego. http://www.csupomona.edu/~jkirkpatrick/Papers/CritBluff.pdf Accessed 11 August 2012.

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Trevino, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. A., Levenburg, N. M., & Mothersell, W. (2006). Cheating during the college years: how do business school students compare. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krowske, B. J., Rasch, R., & Wiley, J. (2010). Millennials’ (lack of) attitude problem: an empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. C. (1995). Ethics of business students: some marketing perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 571–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, T. C., Choe, K. L., & Ramly, Z. (2009). Exploring ethical orientations of future business leaders in Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(2), 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Mizerski, D., Lee, A., & Liu, F. (2009). The relationship between attitude and behavior: an empirical study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(2), 232–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, S. H., & Holmes, E. K. (2010). The psychology of making ethical decisions: what affects the decision? Psychology Services, 7(2), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. E., & Beck-Dudley, C. L. (1994). Are deontology and teleology mutually exclusive? Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 615–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud, S. N. D., & Osman, K. (2010). The determinants of recycling intention behavior among the Malaysian school students: an application of theory of planned behaviour. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification and endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mat Norwani, N., Mohamad, Z. Z., & Chek, I. T. (2011). Corporate governance failure and impact on financial reporting within selected companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(21), 205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: a review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation and intention. Business Society, 41(1), 84–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: a decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, P. A., & Jones, D. G. B. (1992). Machiavellianism and business education. Psychological Reports, 71, 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2006). An analysis of the factor structure of Jones’ moral intensity construct. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 381–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2007). Psychometric properties of the Reidenbach–Robin multidimensional ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modarres, A., & Rafiee, A. (2011). Influencing factors on the ethical decision making of Iranian accountants. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(6), 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtar, R., Othman, A., Zainuddin, Y. (2010). Psychological characteristics and entrepreneurial intention among Polytechnic students in Malaysia: a theory of planned behavior approach. In The first seminar on: entrepreneurship and societal development in Asean (ISE-SODA 2010) “Achieving Regional Growth through Entrepreneurship Education”, 27th February–1st March 2010, City Bayview Hotel Langkawi. ASEAN Universities Consortium of Entrepreneurship Education (AUCEE), 55–69.

  • Molnar, K. K., Kletke, M. G., & Chongwatpol, J. (2008). Ethics vs. IT ethics: do undergraduate perceive a difference. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 657–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S., & McDonald, R. (1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 715–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nantel, J., & Weeks, W. A. (1996). Marketing ethics: is there more to it than the utilitarian approach? European Journal of Marketing, 30(5), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, A. J. (2009). Generational perceptions: workers and consumers. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 7(10), 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noordin, M. F., & Sadi, A. H. M. S. (2010). The adoption of mobile commerce in Malaysia: an exploratory study on the extension of theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Analyst, 31(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, D. (1998). From the business ethics course to the sustainable curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1765–1777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 890–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, K. P., & May, D. R. (2002). Ethics and the digital dragnet: magnitude of consequences, accountability, and the ethical decision making of information systems professionals. Academy of Management Proceedings, http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/hrosenba/www/l574/pdf/pauli_ethics-it.pdf Accessed 11 June 2011.

  • Pearsall, M. J., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2011). Thick as thieves: the effects of ethical orientation and psychological safety on unethical team behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. L., & Clancy, K. J. (1972). Some effects of “social desirability” in survey studies. The American Journal of Sociology, 77(5), 921–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainbow, C. (2002). Descriptive of ethical theories and principles, http://www.biodavidson.edu/people/kaberndep/carainbow/Theories.html Accessed 1 June 2011.

  • Randall, D. M. (1994). Why students take elective business ethics courses: applying the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T. G., & Bisson, J. (2011). Can ethics be taught? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(12), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saat, M. M., Jamal, N. M., Othman, A. (2004). Lecturer’s and student’s perception on ethics in academic and lecturer’s-student interaction. Research Management Centre, http://eprints.utm.my/2745/1/71989.pdf Accessed 4 June 2011.

  • Saat, M. M., Porter, S., & Woodbine, G. (2010). An exploratory study of the impact of Malaysian ethics education on ethical sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 7, 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A., Ahmad, A., & Kumah, N. (2009). Human governance: a neglected mantra for continuous performance improvement. Performance Improvement, 48(9), 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sautter, J. A., Brown, T. A., Littvay, L., Sautter, A. C., & Bearness, B. (2008). Attitude and divergence in business students: an examination of personality differences in business and non-business students. EBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 13(2), 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Securities Commission (2012). Malaysian code on Corporate Governance 2012, http://www.sc.com.my/eng/html/cg/cg2012.pdf Accessed 11 August 2012.

  • Sedmak, S., & Nastav, B. (2010). Perception of ethical behavior among business studies student. 11th International Conference on Social Responsibility, Professional Ethics and Management, 24–27 November 2010, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Shaver, R. (2010). Egoism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/egoism/ Accessed 23 April 2012.

  • Shaw, W. H., & Barry, V. (2010). Moral issues in business (11th ed.). Canada: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikula, A., & Costa, A. (1994). Are women more ethical than men? Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 859–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., Mitchell, S., & Turner, J. (1998). Consideration of moral intensity in ethicality judgments: its relationship with whistle blowing and need-for-cognition. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(5), 527–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999). Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Karande, K., Rao, C. P., & Vitell, S. J. (2001). How important are ethics and social responsibility? a multinational study of marketing professionals. European Journal of Marketing, 5(1/2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (2010). Measuring the consequences of rules. Utitas, 22(4), 413–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. W., & Clark, G. (2010). New games, different roles- Millennials are in town. Journal of Diversity Management, 1(3), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. J., Davy, J. A., Rosenberg, D. L., & Haight, G. F. (2009). The role of motivation and attitude on cheating among business students (pp. 12–37). Ethics: Journal of Academic and Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, L. (2005). The theory of planned behavior and impact on past behavior. The International Business & Economics Research Journal, 10(1), 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2009). Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14(3), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1983). White collar crime: The uncut version. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, B., & Costello, F. (2009). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making: an empirical examination of undergraduate accounting and business students. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 18(1), 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J. (1986). Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. Developmental Review, 6(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. R., & Phua, F. T. T. (2005). Reliability among senior managers of the Marlowe-Crowne short-form social desirability scale. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(4), 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuraisingam, A. S., & Sivanathan, P. (2012). Gxeneration Y’s perception towards law and ethics. Journal of Advanced Social Research, 2, 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (2011). Surveys and indices: corruption perception index, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi Accessed 23 April 2012.

  • Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2004). Managing to be ethical: debunking five business ethics myth. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: a review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsalikis, J., & Ortiz-Buonafina, M. (1990). Ethical beliefs’ differences of males and females. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 509–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanasco, R. R. (1998). Fraud auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 13(1), 4–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (1996). Influences upon managerial moral decision making: nature of the harm and magnitude of consequences. Human Relation, 49(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J., & Gillespie, J. (1998). Differences in ethical beliefs, intentions and behaviors: the role of beliefs and intentions in ethics research revisited. Business and Society, 37(4), 447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. A. (2008). Predicting intended unethical behavior of business students. Journal of Education for Business, March/April, 187–194.

  • Woiceshyn, J. (2011). A model for ethical decision making in business, reasoning, intuition and rational moral principle. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyld, D. C., & Jones, C. A. (1997). Importance of context. The ethical work climate construct and models of ethical decision-making–an agenda for research. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabid, A. R. M., & Alsagoff, S. K. (1993). Perceived ethical values of Malaysian managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joyce K. H. Nga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nga, J.K.H., Lum, E.W.S. An Investigation into Unethical Behavior Intentions Among Undergraduate Students: A Malaysian Study. J Acad Ethics 11, 45–71 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9176-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9176-1

Keywords

Navigation